Equity, efficiency, security and liberty are the four main policy goals in a society. This paper examines the current trade-offs of these goals with agricultural trade liberalization for developing countries. Trade liberalization may cause contradictory results for developing countries. While trade liberalization may improve the welfare of a country, the distribution of income in that country may deteriorate. Efficiency, on the other hand, is another concept that depends not only on who defines it, but also on how it is defined. Liberalized trade may increase the efficient use of resources; however, it may also harm sustainability. Free trade may pave the way for liberty; however, new regional trading blocs may curtail the free choice of states, causing greater interdependence. Trade data over recent years show a decreasing share of total trade in developing countries despite an increase in the absolute value. Thus, liberalized trade in agriculture could help developing countries to achieve these universal goals if it were accompanied by decisive reforms and supported by international consciousness.
AhmedN. (2003), ‘Trade liberalization and endogenous growth of manufacturing industries in Bangladesh: An empirical investigation’, Applied Economics, Vol 35, No 3pp 305–314.
2.
AlamA. (1995), ‘New trade theory and developing countries’, World Economy, Vol 18, No 3pp 367–385.
3.
AticiC. (2002), ‘The impact of a complete trade liberalization on household groups in Turkish economy: A CGE approach’, paper presented at ERC/METU International Conference in Economics VI, 11–14 September, Ankara.
4.
BaffesJ.MeermanJ. (1998), ‘From prices to incomes: Agricultural subsidization without protection?’World Bank Research Observer, Vol 13, No 2pp 191–211.
5.
BallT.DaggerR. (1995), Political Ideologies and Democratic Ideal, HarperCollins College Publishers, New York, pp 14–144.
6.
BayarA.DiaoX.YeldanA. E. (2000), ‘An intertemporal multiregional general equilibrium model of agricultural trade liberalization in the south Mediterranean, NICs, Turkey, and European Union’, TMD Discussion Paper No 56: Trade and Macroeconomic Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
7.
BayarG. (2002), ‘Effects of foreign trade liberalization on the productivity of industrial sectors in Turkey’, Emerging Markets, Finance and Trade, Vol 38, No 5pp 46–71.
8.
Bokser-LiwerantJ. (2002), ‘Globalization and collective identities’, Social Compass, Vol 49, No 2pp 253–271.
9.
BromF. W. A. (2000), ‘Food, consumer concerns, and trust: Food ethics for a globalizing market’, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, Vol 12, pp 127–139.
10.
de MeloJ.RobinsonS. (1980), ‘The impact of trade policies on income distribution in a planning model for Colombia’, Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol 2, No 1pp 81–100.
11.
DeanJ. M. (2002), ‘Does trade liberalization harm the environment? A new test’, Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol 35, No 4pp 819–842.
12.
DixitA. K.NormanV. (1995), Theory of International Trade, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
FengY.ZakP. J. (1999), ‘The determinants of democratic transitions’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol 43, No 2pp 162–177.
15.
FlintM. (1993), ‘Biological diversity and developing countries’, in MarkandyaA.RichardsonJ. eds, Environmental Economics: A Reader, St. Martin's Press, New York, pp 437–468.
16.
GreigJ. M. (2002), ‘The end of geography? Globalization, communications, and culture in the international system’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol 46, No 2pp 225–243.
17.
HelliwellJ. F. (1994), ‘Empirical linkages between democracy and economic-growth’, British Journal of Political Science, Vol 24, No 2pp 225–248.
18.
HerriotR.Scott-JacksonW. (2002), ‘Globalization, social identities and employment’, British Journal of Management, Vol 13, No 3pp 249–257.
19.
KennedyP. L.AticiC. (1999), ‘A game theoretic analysis of Turkish accession to a European customs union’, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Vol 28, No 2pp 147–157.
20.
KrugmanP. R. (1987), ‘Is free trade passé?’Economic Perspectives, Vol 2, No 1pp 31–44.
21.
LindertP. H.WilliamsonJ. G. (2001), Does the Globalization Make the World More Unequal?Working Paper 8228, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.
22.
LofgrenH. (1999), ‘Trade reform and poor in Morocco. A rural– urban general equilibrium analysis of reduced protection’, TMD Discussion Paper No 38, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
23.
LondreganJ. B.PooleK. T. (1996), ‘Does high income promote democracy?’World Politics, Vol 49, No 1pp 1–30.
24.
MartinezL.TornellA.WestermannF. (2004), ‘Globalization, growth and financial crises – lessons from Mexico and the developing world’, Trimestre Economico, Vol 71, No 282pp 251–351.
25.
McCallaA. F. (2003), ‘Liberalizing agricultural trade: Will it ever be a reality?’Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Vol 28, No 3pp 419–434.
26.
McDonaldP. J. (2004), ‘Peace through trade or free trade’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol 48, No 4pp 547–572.
27.
McMurtryJ. (2002), ‘Why the protestors are against corporate globalization’, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol 40, No 3pp 201–205.
28.
MonteroJ. P. (2002), ‘Permits, standards, and technology innovation’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol 44, No 1pp 23–44.
29.
OskamA. J.KomenM. H. C.WobstP.YalewA. (2004), ‘Trade policies and development of less-favoured areas: Evidence from the literature’, Food Policy, Vol 9, No 4pp 445–466.
30.
PetrellaR. (1996), ‘Globalization and internationalization’, in BoyerR.DracheD. eds, States Against Markets, Routledge, London.
31.
PrettyJ. (2001), ‘The rapid emergence of genetic modification in world agriculture: Contested risks and benefits’, Environmental Conservation, Vol 28, No 3pp 248–262.
32.
RamakrishnanP. S. (2001), ‘Increasing population and declining biological resources in the context of global change and globalization’, Journal of Biosciences, Vol 26, No 4pp 465–479.
33.
RobinsonS.BurfisherM. E.HinojosaojedaR.ThierfelderK. E. (1993), ‘Agricultural policies and migration in a United States–Mexico free trade area: A computable general equilibrium analysis’, Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol 15, Nos 5–6pp 673–701.
34.
Raoult-WackA. L.BricasN. (2002), ‘Ethical issues related to food sector evolution in developing countries: About sustainability and equity’, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, Vol 5, pp 325–334.
35.
SalhoferK. (1996), ‘Efficient income redistribution for a small country using optimal combined instruments’, Agricultural Economics, Vol 13, No 3pp 191–199.
36.
Santos-PaulinoA. U. (2004), ‘Trade liberalization and the balance of payments in selected developing countries’, Manchester School, Vol 72, No 1pp 100–118.
37.
SeikF. T. (1996), ‘Urban environmental policy – the use of regulatory and economic instruments in Singapore’, Habitat International, Vol 20, No 1pp 5–22.
38.
StoneD. (1997), Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making, W. W. Norton, New York, pp 39–48.
39.
StonehouseD. P. (2000), ‘A review of WTO and environmental issues’, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, Vol 13, pp 121–144.
40.
StruttA.AndersonK. (2000), ‘Will trade liberalization harm the environment? The case of Indonesia to 2020’, Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol 17, No 3pp 203–232.
41.
ViatteG. (2001), ‘Global economy in the new millennium: A dynamic context for food and agricultural policies’, Outlook on Agriculture, Vol 30, No 1pp 21–25.
42.
VieriaL. (1999), ‘Global citizenship and the national state’, Dados-Revista de Ciencas Sociais, Vol 42, No 3pp 395–419.
43.
WobstP. (2002), ‘The impact of domestic and global trade liberalization on five southern African countries’, TMD Discussion Paper No 92, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
44.
WTO (2002), International Trade Statistics, Website: www.wto.org.
45.
YusufShadid, (2001), Globalization and the Challenge for Developing Countries, World Bank Working Paper No 2618, Washington, DC.
