This paper is concerned with the degree to which the graduate skills required by industry are developed in Australian universities. Despite acknowledgement of the need to increase the graduate skills of students, it would seem that the stated intentions of Australian universities in this respect do not yet meet the expectations of industry. The establishment of an enterprise programme at the University of Tasmania provides, by way of example, support for the contention that the development of skills wanted by industry is possible alongside the desirable knowledge outcomes of a university. It is argued that lecturers and students must give and accept more responsibility for learning to enable the development of desirable graduate skills.
AmitR.GlostenL.MullerE. (1990), ‘Entrepreneurial ability, venture investing, and risk sharing’, Management Science, Vol 36, No 10, pp 1232–1245.
3.
BatesonJ.E.G. (1985), ‘Perceived control and the service encounter’, in CzepielJ.A.SolomonM.R.SurprenantC.F., eds, The Service Encounter, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
4.
CampbellD.T. (1965), ‘Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution’, in BarringerH.R.BlankstenG.I.MackR.W., eds, Social Change in Developing Areas: A Reinterpretation of Evolutionary Theory, Schenkman, Cambridge.
5.
ChaharbaghiK.WillisR. (1998), ‘Beyond entrepreneurship: New market values’, paper presented at the 6th Annual High Technology Small Firms Conference, Enschede, 4–5 June.
6.
ClanchyJ.BallardB. (1995), ‘Generic skills in the context of higher education’, Higher Education Research & Development, Vol 14, No 2, pp 155–166.
7.
CooperS.BottomleyC.GordonJ. (2004). ‘Stepping out of the classroom and up the ladder of learning: An experiential learning approach to entrepreneurship education’, Industry & Higher Education, Vol 18, No 1, pp 11–22.
8.
CrebertG.BatesM.BellB.PatrickC.CragnoliniV. (2004), ‘Developing generic skills at university, during work placement and in employment: Graduate perceptions’, Higher Education Research & Development, Vol 23, No 2, pp 147–166.
9.
DavidssonP.WiklundJ. (2001), ‘Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current research practice and suggestions for the future’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol 25, No 4, pp 81–99.
10.
DeweyJ. (1922), Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology, Henry Holt and Company, New York.
GaravanT.N.O'CinneideB.FlemingP. (1997), Entrepreneurship and Business Start-Ups in Ireland, Vol 1, Oak Tree Press, Dublin.
13.
GibbA.A. (1993), ‘The enterprise culture and education’, International Small Business Journal, Vol 11, pp 11–34.
14.
GibbA.A. (2002), ‘In pursuit of a new “enterprise” and “entrepreneurship” paradigm for learning: Creative destruction, new values, new ways of doing things and new combinations of knowledge’, International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol 4, No 3, pp 233–269.
15.
GrantV. (1985), The Evolutionary Process: A Critical Review of Evolutionary Theory, Cambridge University Press, New York.
16.
HartshornC. (2002), ‘Understanding notions of enterprise in the higher education sector’, Industry & Higher Education, Vol 16, No 3, pp 149–158.
17.
HodgsonG.M. (2001), ‘Is social evolution Lamarckian or Darwinian’, in NightingaleJ. J.LaurentJ., eds, Darwinism and Evolutionary Economics, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
18.
HodgsonG.M. (2003), ‘The mystery of the routine: The Darwinian destiny of an evolutionary theory of economic change’, Revue Economique, Vol 54, No 2, pp 355–384.
19.
HullD.L. (1988), Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
20.
JonesC. (2005), ‘Firm transformation: Advancing a Darwinian perspective’, Management Decision, Vol 43, No 1, forthcoming.
21.
JonesC.EnglishJ. (2004), ‘A contemporary approach to entrepreneurship education’, Education + Training, Vol 46, No 8/9 pp 416–423.
22.
KnudsenT. (2002), ‘Economic selection theory’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol 12, No 4, pp 443–470.
23.
MatlayH.MitraJ. (2002), ‘Entrepreneurship and learning: The double act in the triple helix’, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Vol 3, No 1, pp 7–16.
24.
MitraJ. (2002), ‘Consider Velasquez: Reflections on the development of entrepreneurship programmes’, Industry & Higher Education, Vol 16, No 3, 191–202.
25.
StuartH. (1997), ‘Exploring the corporate identity/corporate image interface: An empirical study of accountancy firms’, Journal of Communication Management, Vol 2, No 4, pp 357–372.
26.
VeblenT. (1925), The Theory of the Leisure Class, George Allen & Unwin, London.
27.
YoungM.R.KlemzB.R.MurphyJ.W. (2003), ‘Enhancing learning outcomes: The effects of instructional technology, learning styles, instructional methods, and student behaviour’, Journal of Marketing Education, Vol 25, No 2, pp 130–142.
