The European entrepreneurial university is based on the teaching mission of the university, whereas US academic entrepreneurship is typically an extension of the research mission. Recognizing that the European professoriate has traditionally been more removed from entrepreneurship than its US counterpart, some European universities have organized programmes to train students to develop start-up firms. Nevertheless, given similar goals of encouraging science-based regional development, and increasing the returns to the university from its research and other activities, it can be expected that European and US universities will adopt each other's entrepreneurial formats in coming years.
CampbellKatherine (2002), ‘Global investing: Moving beyond the Silicon Valley: Europe's high tech centres differ from their US cousins’, Financial Times, 17 January.
3.
CharlesDavidConwayCheryl (2001), Higher Education-Business Interaction Survey, report to the UK Office of Science and Technology (OSTP), Centre for Urban and Regional Studies (CURDS), University of Newcastle upon Tyne (www.ncl.ac.uk/curds).
4.
ClarkBurton (1998), Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation, Pergamon, New York.
5.
DavisCaroline (2002), ‘Sainsbury ups game in play for extra cash’, Times Higher Education Supplement, 11 January.
6.
EtzkowitzHenry (1983), ‘Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science’, Minerva, Autumn, Vol 21, pp 198–233.
7.
EtzkowitzHenry (1996), ‘Losing our bearings: The science policy crisis in post-Cold War Europe, former Soviet Union and USA’, Science and Public Policy February.
8.
EtzkowitzHenry (2002), MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science, Routledge, London.
9.
EtzkowitzHenryAsplundPatrikNordmanNiklas (2003), ‘Beyond Humboldt: The entrepreneurial university the third mission and the triple helix’, VEST Journal for Science and Technology Studies, Vol 16, No 1, pp 21–45.
10.
EtzkowitzHenryWebsterAndrewHealeyPeter, eds (1998), Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.
11.
GustinBernard (1975), The Emergence of the German Chemical Profession, 1790–1867, PhD thesis, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
12.
JencksChristopherReismanDavid (1968), The Academic Revolution, Doubleday, New York.
13.
MartinBenEtzkowitzHenry (2000), ‘The origin and evolution of the university species’, VEST Journal for Science and Technology Studies, Vol 13, No 3–4 pp 9–34.
14.
MerrienXavierFrancoisMousseliChristine (1999), ‘Are French universities finally emerging? Path dependency phenomena and innovative reforms in France’, in BraunDietmarMerrienFrançois-Xavier, eds, Towards a New Model of Governance for Universities? A Comparative View, JessicaKingsley London.
RashdallHastings (1895), The Universities of Europe in the Middle Ages, Clarendon, Oxford.
17.
RothblattSheldonWittrockBjorn, eds (1993), The European and American University Since 1800, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18.
SenkerJacquelineSenkerPeterHallAndrew (1993), Teaching Company Performance and Features of Successful Programmes, SPRU Special Report, Science Policy Research Unit, Brighton.
19.
SlaughterS.LeslieL., Academic Capitalism, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1997.
20.
TornqvistGunnar (2002), Science at the Cutting Edge: The Future of the Oresund Region, Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen.
21.
YlinenpääHåkan (2001), ‘Co-operation, trust and triple helixes in a Northern dimension’, paper presented at the Think-Tank Seminar on the Northern Dimension and the Future of the Barents: Euro-Arctic Co-operation, Swedish Lapland, 14–17 June.
