Social Capital and Farmers' Willingness to Adopt Countryside Stewardship Schemes

Abstract

The EU provides farmers with incentives to adopt Countryside Stewardship Schemes (CSS) using subsidies in the framework of the agri-environmental regulation of the EU (2078/92), now included in the more general regulation on rural development. In this paper, a case study of 36 farmers in the village of Bierbeek was carried out to investigate the determinants of the willingness to adopt a scheme involving taking care of arable field margins in particular. Bivariate and multivariate logit analysis confirmed not only the importance of personal, structural and financial factors, but also showed the importance of social capital. Farmers who are more open to both professional and non-professional contacts are more likely to adopt a CSS. Hence, government and extension agencies should undertake more efforts to involve farmers as much as possible in activities of a professional and/or non-professional nature to stimulate them to adopt sustainable farming practices.

Keywords

countryside stewardship social capital

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Battershill

M. R. J.

, and Gilg

A. W.

(1997), ‘Socio-economic constraints and environmentally friendly farming in the Southwest of England’, Journal of Rural Studies, Vol 13, No 2, pp 213–228.

Burton

Rigby

, and Young

(1999), ‘Analysis of the determinants of adoption of organic horticultural techniques in the UK’, Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 50, No 1, pp 48–63.

Coleman

J. S.

(1988), ‘Social capital in the creation of human capital’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol 94, Supplement, pp 95–120.

Drake

Bergström

, and Svedsäter

(1999), ‘Farmers' attitudes to and uptake of countryside stewardship policies’, Organized Session, IXth European Congress of Agricultural Economics, Warsaw, Poland.

Ervin

C. A.

, and Ervin

D. E.

(1982), ‘Factors affecting the use of soil conservation practices — hypotheses, evidence and policy implications’, Land Economics, Vol 58, No 3, pp 277–292.

Fafchamps

, and Minten

(2002), ‘Returns to social network capital among traders’, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol 54, No 2, pp 173–206.

Falconer

(2000), ‘Farm-level constraints on agri-environmental scheme participation: A transactional perspectiv e’, Journal of Rural Studies, Vol 16, No 3, pp 379–394.

Gow

H. R.

, and Swinnen

J. F. M.

(1998), ‘Up- and downstream restructuring, foreign direct investment, and hold-up problems in agricultural transition’, European Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol 23, No 5, pp 331–350.

Morris

Mills

, and Crawford

I. M.

(2000), ‘Promoting farmer uptake of agri-environment schemes: The Countryside Stewardship Arable Options Scheme’, Land Use Policy, Vol 17, No 3, pp 241–254.

10.

Morris

, and Potter

(1995), ‘Recruiting the new conservationists — farmers' adoption of agri-environmental schemes in the UK’, Journal of Rural Studies, Vol 11, No 1, pp 51–63.

11.

Nowak

P. J.

(1987), ‘The adoption of agricultural conservation technologies — economic and diffusion explanations’, Rural Sociology, Vol 52, No 2, pp 208–220.

12.

Van Huylenbroeck

, and Whitby

, eds (1999), Countryside Stewardship: Farmers, Policies and Markets, Pergamon, Oxford.

13.

Wall

Ferrazzi

, and Schryer

(1998), ‘Getting the goods on social capital’, Rural Sociology, Vol 63, No 2, pp 300–322.

14.

Willock

Deary

I. J.

Edwards-Jones

Gibson

G. J.

McGregor

M. J.

Sutherland

Dent

J. B.

Morgan

, and Grieve

(1999), ‘The role of attitudes and objectives in farmer decision making: Business and environmentally-oriented behaviour in Scotland’, Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 50, No 2, pp 286–303.

15.

Wilson

G. A.

(1997), ‘Factors influencing farmer participation in the environmentally sensitive areas scheme’, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol 50, No 1, pp 67–93.

16.

Wilson

G. A.

, and Hart

(2000), ‘Financial imperative or conservation concern? EU farmers' motivations for participation in voluntary agri-environmental schemes’, Environment Planning A, Vol 32, No 12, pp 2161–2185.