The purpose of this paper is to present and demonstrate the usefulness of the dynamic shift-share method in examining the performance of the tourism industry using time-series employment data for the State of Texas and the USA, and to compare its results with those of the traditional accounting based shift-share analysis. The findings show that, compared to the US average, the change in employment in Texas was mainly due to the strong national economy and not to the region's competitiveness or sectoral make-up. According to the findings, the use of a dynamic shift-share model eliminated one theoretical problem inherent in the classical static method.
AndrikopolousA.BronxJ.CarvalhoE. (1990), ‘Shift-share analysis and the potential for predicting regional growth patterns: Some evidence for the region of Quebec, Canada’, Growth and Change, Vol 21, No 1, pp1–10.
2.
BarffR.A.KnightP.L.III (1988), ‘Dynamic shift share analysis’, Growth and Change, Vol 19, No 1, pp 1–11.
3.
BartikT.J. (1991), Who Benefits from State and Local Economic Development Policies?, W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, MI.
4.
BeckR. J.HerrWilliam McD. (1990), ‘Employment linkages from a modified shift-share analysis: An Illinois example’, Review of Regional Studies, Vol 20, No 3, pp 38–45.
5.
Bendavid-ValA. (1991), Regional and Local Economic Analysis for Practitioners, 4th edition, Praeger, New York.
6.
BrownJ.J. (1969), ‘Shift and share projections of regional economic growth: An empirical test’, Journal of Regional Science, Vol 9, No 1, pp 1–18.
7.
CaslerS.D. (1989), ‘A theoretical context for shift share analysis’, Regional Studies, Vol 23, No 1, pp 43–48.
8.
CurtisW.C. (1972), ‘Shift-share analysis as a technique in rural development research’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 54, No 2, pp 267–270.
9.
DoeringerP.B.TerklaD. G.TopakianG. C. (1987), Invisible Factors in Local Economic Development, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford.
10.
DunnE.S.Jr (1960), ‘A statistical and analytical technique for regional analysis’, Papers of the Regional Science Association, Vol 6, pp 97–112.
11.
FoterhgillS.GudginG. (1979), ‘In defense of shift-share’, Urban Studies, Vol 16, No 3, pp 309–19.
12.
GlickmanN.J.GlasmeierA. (1989), ‘The international economy and the American South’, in BodwinL.SazanamiH., eds, Deindustrialization and Regional Transformation: The Experience of the United States, Unwin Hyman, Boston, pp. 60–80.
13.
HooverE.M. (1984), An Introduction to Regional Economics, 3rd edition, Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
14.
HuffD.SherrL. (1967), ‘Measure for determining differential growth rates of markets’, Journal of Market Geography, Vol 4, pp 391–395.
15.
KnudsenD.C. (2000), ‘Shift-share analysis: Further examination of models for the description of economic change’, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol 34, No 3, pp 177–198.
16.
KurreJ.A.WellerB. R. (1989), ‘Forecasting the local economy: Using time series and shift-share techniques’, Environment and Planning, Vol 21, No 6, pp 753–770.
17.
LedeburL.C.RonaldL. M. (1983), ‘A shift-share analysis of regional labor productivity in manufacturing’, Growth and Change, Vol 14, No 1, pp 2–9.
18.
MeadA.C.RamsayG. A. (1982), ‘Analyzing differential responses of a region to business cycles’, Growth and Change, Vol 13, No 1, pp 38–42.
19.
MooreB.C.RhodesJ. (1973), ‘Evaluating the effects of British regional economic policy’, Economic Journal, Vol 83, No 1, pp 87–110.
20.
PattersonM.G. (1991), ‘A note on the formulation of a full-analogue regression model of the shift-share method’, Journal of Regional Science, Vol 31, No 2, pp 211–216.
21.
PerloffH.S.DunnE. S.JrLampardE. E.MuthR. M. (1960), Regions Resources and Economic Growth, University of Nebraska Press.
22.
PlaneD.A. (1987), ‘The geographic components of change in a migration system’, Geographical Analysis, Vol 19, No 4, pp 283–289.
23.
RichardsonH.W. (1978), ‘The state of regional economics: A survey article’, Southern Economic Journal, Vol 33, No 1, pp 1–48.
24.
SirakayaE.UysalM.ToepperL. (1995), ‘Measuring the performance of South Carolina's tourist industry from shift-share analysis: A case study’, Journal of Travel Research, Vol l, No 2, pp 55–62.
StevensB.H.MooreC.L. (1980), ‘A critical review of the shift-share as a forecasting technique’, Journal of Regional Science, Vol 20, No 4, pp 419–437.
27.
StilwellF. J. B. (1969), ‘Regional growth and structural adaptation’, Urban Studies, Vol 6, pp 162–178.
28.
TervoH.OkkoP. (1983), ‘A note of shift-share as a method of estimating the employment effects of regional economic policy’, Journal of Regional Science, Vol 23, No 1, pp 115–121.
29.
Texas Department of the Economic Development Tourism Division (2000), Economic Impact of Travel on Texas: 1990–1999 Summary Table & 1994–1999 Detailed Table, Texas Department of Economic Development and Dean Runyan Associates, Texas (http://research.travel.state.tx.us).
30.
US Department Of Commerce (1964, 1966, 1968, 1970, 1972, 1974, 1976, 1978, 1980, 1982, 1984, 1986, 1988, 1990, 1992, 1994 and 1996), County Business Patterns, US Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC.
