Wilderness is a unique environmental resource that provides a multitude of use and non-use benefits. The use and management of wilderness depend on the assessment of wilderness quality. Current wilderness assessment in Australia is based on two broad criteria, the remoteness and naturalness of the wilderness, determined using geographic information systems. This paper discusses a complementary assessment method using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The AHP can be used to incorporate additional criteria, such as social and cultural criteria, to improve the quality of wilderness assessment. It provides a flexible and compatible method for large-scale wilderness assessments with multiple criteria. The weighting factors for the different criteria can be obtained from expert panels and focus groups.
AldredJ.JacobsM. (2000), ‘Citizens and wetlands: Evaluating the Ely's citizens' jury’, Ecological Economics, Vol 34, pp 217–232.
2.
AlhoJ.M.KangasJ. (1997), ‘Analyzing uncertainties in experts’ opinions of forest plan performance', Forest Science, Vol 43, No 4, pp 521–528.
3.
AlhoJ.M.KangasJ.KolehmainenO. (1996), ‘Uncertainty in expert predictions of the ecological consequences of forest plans’, Applied Statistics, Vol 45, No 1, pp 1–14.
4.
BeinatE.NijkampP. (1998), ‘Land use management and the paths towards sustainability’, in BeinatNijkamp (1998).
5.
BeinatE.NijkampP., eds (1998), Multicriteria Analysis for Land-Use Management, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
6.
BradburyR. (1996), ‘Tracking progress: Linking environment and economy through indicators and accounting systems’, Proceedings of Australian Academy of Science Fenner Conference on the Environment, University of New South Wales, Institute of Environmental Studies, pp 1–8.
7.
BuckleyR.C. (1994), ‘A framework for ecotourism’, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol 1, pp 24–32.
8.
BuckleyR.C. (2000), ‘Tourism and wilderness: Dancing with the messy monster’, in McCool (2000a), pp 186–189.
9.
CallicottJ.B. (2000), ‘Contemporary criticisms of the received wilderness idea’, in Cole (2000a).
10.
CarboneF.De MontisA.De ToroP.StaglS. (2000), ‘MCDA methods comparison: Environmental policy evaluation applied to a case study in Italy’, paper presented at the Third International Conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics, Vienna, Austria, 3–6 May 2000.
11.
ColeD.N.McCoolS.F. (2000), ‘Introduction’, in Cole (2000b), pp 1–2.
12.
ColeD.N.McCoolS.F.FreimundW.O'LoughlinJ., eds (2000a), Wilderness Science in a Time of Change Conference – Volume 1: Changing Perspectives and Future Directions, 23–27 May 1999, Missoula, MT, Proceedings RMRS-P-15-VOL-3, US Dept of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
13.
ColeD.N.McCoolS.F.BonnieW.T.O'LoughlinJ., eds (2000b), Wilderness Science in a Time of Change Conference – Volume 4: Wilderness Visitors, Experiences, and Visitor Management, 23–27 May 1999, Missoula, MT, Proceedings RMRS-P-15-VOL-3, US Dept of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
14.
Commonwealth of Australia (1998), North East Victoria: Comprehensive Regional Assessment Report, Joint Commonwealth and Victorian Regional Forest Agreement Steering Committee, Canberra.
15.
CrosbyN. (1996), Correcting an Authentic Voice of the People: Deliberation on Democratic Theory and Practice, Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
16.
DavidsonR.J.GrayP.A.BoydS.CordinerG.S. (2000), ‘State-of-the-wilderness reporting in Ontario: Models, tools and techniques’, in McCool (2000a).
17.
DavisB. (1989), ‘Wilderness conservation in Australia: Eight governments in search of a policy’, Natural Resources Journal, Vol 29, pp 103–113.
18.
de MarchiB.RavetzJ.R. (2001), ‘Participatory approaches to environmental valuation’, Policy Research Brief No 10, Environmental Valuation in Europe (SpashC.L.CarterC., eds), Cambridge Research for the Environment, http://www.landecon.cam.ac.uk/eve/publ.html#PRB.
19.
EastmanR.J.JiangH.ToledanaJ. (1998), ‘Multi-criteria and multi-objective decision making for land allocation using GIS’, in BeinatNijkamp (1998).
20.
EastmanR.J.JiangH. (1996), ‘Fuzzy measures in multi-criteria evaluation’, Proceedings, Second International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, 21–23 May, Fort Collins, CO, pp 527–534.
21.
EhtamoH.KettunenE.HämäläinenR.P. (2001), ‘Searching for joint gains in multi-party negotiations’, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol 130, pp 54–69.
22.
FagreD.B.PetersonD.L. (2000), ‘Ecosystem dynamics and disturbance in mountain wilderness: Assessing vulnerability of natural resources to change’, in McCool (2000b).
23.
FellerM.HooleyD.DreherT.EastI.JungR. (1979), Wilderness in Victoria: An Inventory, Department of Geography, Monash University, Melbourne.
24.
FraserI.ChisholmT. (2000), ‘Conservation or cultural heritage? Cattle grazing in the Victoria Alpine National Park’, Ecological Economics, Vol 33, pp 63–75.
25.
FritzS.CarverS.SeeL. (2000), ‘New GIS approaches to wild land mapping in Europe’, in McCool (2000a).
26.
GregoryR.S. (2000), ‘Valuing environmental options: A case study comparison of multi-attribute and contingent valuation survey methods’, Land Economics, Vol 76, No 2, pp 151–173.
27.
HallC.M. (1992), Wasteland to World Heritage, Melbourne University Press, Melbourne.
28.
HelmanP.M.JonesA.D.PigramJ.J.SmithJ.M.B. (1976), Wilderness in Australia: Eastern New South Wales and Southern Eastern Queensland, Department of Geography, University of New England, Armidale.
29.
HerathG. (1997), ‘Ecotourism development in Australia’, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol 24, pp 442–445.
30.
HerathG. (2002), ‘The economics and politics of wilderness conservation in Australia’, Society and Nature Resources, Vol 15, pp 147–159.
31.
JankowskiP. (1995), ‘Integrating geographical information systems and multiple criteria decision-making methods’, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, Vol 9, pp 251–273.
32.
KangasJ. (1993), ‘A multi-attribute preference model for evaluating the reforestation chain alternatives of a forest stand’, Forest Ecology and Management, Vol 59, pp 271–288.
33.
KangasJ. (1994), ‘An approach to public participation in strategic forest management planning’, Forest Ecology and Management, Vol 70, pp 75–88.
34.
KeeneyR.L.WinterfeldtD.V.EppelT. (1990), ‘Eliciting public values for complex policy decisions’, Management Science, Vol 36, No 9, pp 1011–1030.
35.
KellowA. (1989), ‘The dispute over the Franklin River and south west wilderness area in Tasmania’, Natural Resources Journal, Vol 29, pp 129–146.
36.
KirkpatrickJ.B.HaneyR.A. (1980), ‘Quantification of developmental wilderness loss: The case of forestry in Tasmania’, Search, Vol 11, pp 331–335.
37.
KliskeyA.D.KearsleyG.W. (1993), ‘Mapping multiple perceptions of wilderness in Southern New Zealand’, Applied Geography, Vol 13, pp 203–223.
38.
KurttilaM.PesonenM.KangasJ.KajanusM. (2000), ‘Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis – a hybrid method and its applications to a forest certification case’, Forest Policy and Economics, Vol 1, pp 41–52.
39.
Land Conservation Council (1991), Wilderness: Special investigation, Proposed Recommendations, Land Conservation Council, Melbourne.
40.
LeskinenP.KangasJ. (1998), ‘Analysing uncertainties of interval judgement data in multiple-criteria evaluation of forest plans’, Silva Fennica, Vol 32, No 4, pp 363–372.
41.
LesslieR.MaslenM. (1995), National Wilderness Inventory Australia: Handbook of Procedures, Content and Usage, 2nd edition, Australian Heritage Commission.
42.
LesslieR.TaylorS.G. (1983), Wilderness in South Australia: An Inventory of the State's Relatively High Quality Wilderness Areas, Occasional Paper No 1, Centre for Environmental Studies, University of Adelaide.
43.
LesslieR.TaylorS.G. (1985), ‘The wilderness continuum concept and its implications for wilderness preservation policy’, Biological Conservation, Vol 32, pp 309–333.
44.
LiddleM.J. (1988), Recreation and the Environment: The Ecology of Recreation Impacts, Griffith University, Brisbane.
45.
Martinez-AlierJ.MundaG.O'NeillJ. (1999), ‘Commensurability and compensability in ecological economics’, in O'ConnorSpash (1999), pp 37–57.
46.
McCoolS.F.ColeD.N.BorrieW.T.O'LoughlinJ., eds (2000a), Wilderness Science in a Time of Change Conference – Volume 2: Wilderness in the Context of Larger Systems, 23–27 May 1999, Missoula, MT, Proceedings RMRS-P-15-VOL-3.US Dept of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, pp 186–189.
47.
McCoolS.F.ColeD.N.BorrieW.T.O'LoughlinJ., eds (2000b), Wilderness Science in a Time of Change Conference – Volume 3: Wilderness as a place for scientific inquiry, 23–27 May 1999, Missoula, MT, Proceedings RMRS-P-15-VOL-3. US Dept of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
48.
McDanielsT.L.RoesslerC. (1998), ‘Multiattribute elicitation of wilderness preservation benefits: A constructive approach’, Ecological Economics, Vol 27, pp 299–312.
49.
MendozaG. (1997), ‘Introduction to analytic hierarchy process: Theory and applications to natural resource management’, 1997 ACSM/ASPRS (American Congress on Surveying and Mapping/American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing) Annual Convention & Exposition, 7–10 April, Seattle, WA, Technical Papers, pp 130–139.
50.
MundaG. (2000), ‘Conceptualizing and responding to complexity’, Policy Research Brief No 2, Environmental Valuation in Europe Europe (SpashC.L.CarterC., eds), Cambridge Research for the Environment (CRE), Cambridge.
51.
NashR. (1982), Wilderness and the American Mind, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
52.
NijkampP.ScholtenH.J. (1993), ‘Spatial information systems: Design, modelling and use in planning’, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, Vol 7, pp 85–96.
53.
O'ConnorM.SpashC., eds, Valuation and the Environment: Theory and Practice, Advances in Ecological Economics, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
54.
OmannI. (2000), ‘How can multi-criteria decision analysis contribute to environmental policy making? A case study on macro-sustainability in Germany’, paper presented at the Third International Conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics, Vienna, Austria, 3–6 May.
55.
O'NeillJ. (2001), ‘Representing people, representing nature, representing the world’, paper presented at Frontiers 1 Conference: Fundamental Issues of Ecological Economics, European Society for Ecological Economics, 3–7 July, Cambridge.
56.
PatronoA. (1998), ‘Multi-criteria analysis and geographic information systems: Analysis of natural areas and ecological distributions’, in BeinatNijkamp (1998).
57.
ProctorW. (2000), ‘Towards sustainable forest management: An application of multi-criteria analysis to Australian forest policy’, paper presented at the Third International Conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics, Vienna, Austria, 3–6 May.
58.
PukkalaT.KangasJ. (1996), ‘A method for integrating risk and attitude toward risk into forest planning’, Forest Science, Vol 42, No 2, pp 198–205.
59.
RaoM.SastryS.V.C.YadarP.D.KharodK.PathanS.K.DhinwaP.S.MajumdarK.L.KumarD.S.PatkarV.N.PhatakV.K. (1991), A Weighted Index Model for Urban Suitability Assessment – A GIS Approach, Bombay Metropolitan Regional Development Authority, Bombay.
60.
ReynoldsK.M.HolstenE.H. (1994), ‘Relative importance of risk factors for spruce beetle outbreaks’, Can. J. For. Res., Vol 24, pp 2089–2095.
61.
RobertsonM.VangK.BrownA.J. (1992), Wilderness in Australia, Issues and Options, Discussion Paper, Australian Heritage Commission, Canberra.
62.
RussellJ.A.MatthewsJ.H.JonesR. (1979), Wilderness in Tasmania: A Report to the Australian Heritage Commission, Centre for Environmental Studies Occasional Paper 10, Board of Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart.
63.
SaatyT. L. (1977), ‘A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures’, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol 15, pp 234–281.
64.
SaatyT. L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
65.
StankeyG.H. (1977), ‘Some social aspects for outdoor recreation: Advantages in application of economics’, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-2.
66.
StantonJ.P.MorganM.G. (1977), The Rapid Selection and Appraisal of Key and Endangered Sites: The Queensland Study, Report No PR 4, School of Natural Resources, University of New England, Armidale.
67.
SteelmanT.A.AscherW. (1997), 'Public involvement methods in natural resource policy making: Advantages, disadvantages and trade-offs, Policy Sciences, Vol 30, pp 71–90.
68.
ThackwayR.BrunckhorstD.J. (1998), ‘Alternative futures for indigenous cultural and natural areas in Australia's rangelands’, Australian Journal of Environmental Management, Vol 5, pp 169–181.
WindY. (1987), ‘An analytic hierarchy process based approach to the design and evaluation of a marketing driven business and corporate strategy’, Mathematical Modelling, Vol 9, Nos 3–5, pp 285–291.
71.
YagerR. (1988), ‘On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making’, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol 8, No 1, pp 338–353.
