The concepts of a learning cycle and a model teaching strategy described in a previous paper are connected here with problem solving and learning contexts. Then they are applied to the analysis of an introductory course in physics for engineering and basic science students. Finally, ‘creativity’ is considered as a learning methodology implying that students work as coauthors in the development of learning contexts and in the design and solution of problems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarojasJ., ‘Technology efficiency education’, Industry and Higher Education, Vol 13, No 4, August 1999, pp 257–266.
2.
BarojasJ.DehesaN., ‘Mathematics for social scientists: Learning cycles and teaching strategies’, Industry and Higher Education, Vol 15, No 4, August 2001, pp 269–277.
3.
SchoenfeldA.H., ‘Episodes and executive decisions in mathematical problem solving’, in LeshR.LandauM., eds, Acquisition of Mathematical Concepts and Processes, Academic Press, New York, 1982, pp 345–395.
4.
PolyaG., How to Solve It, Macmillan, New York, 1985.
5.
ReifF.HellerJ.I., ‘Knowledge structures and problem solving in physics’, Educational Psychologist, Vol 17, No 2, 1982, pp 102–107.
6.
PérezGil D.TorregrosaMartínez J., ‘A model for problem solving in accordance with scientific methodology’, European Journal of Science Education, Vol 5, No 4, 1983, pp 447–455.
7.
MaloneyD.P., ‘Research on problem solving: Physics’, in GabelD. L., ed, Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, Macmillan, New York, 1994, pp 327–354.
8.
KolbD. A., Experiential Learning: Experience as a Source of Learning and Development, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984.
9.
ZollmanD.‘Learning cycle physics’, in RedishE.RigdenJ., eds, The Changing Role of Physics Departments in Modern Universities, Proceedings of IUCPE, Vol II, American Institute of Physics, 1997, pp 1137–1149.
10.
BarojasDehesa, op cit, Ref 2.
11.
WhiteB.FrederiksenJ.‘Inquiry, modeling and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students’, Cognition and Instruction, Vol 16, No 1, 1998, pp 3–118.
12.
Barojas, op cit, Ref 1.
13.
BarojasJ., Física Moderna I: Materia y Radiación (Modern Physics I: Matter and Radiation), Limusa, México, 1981.
14.
RigdenJ.S., ‘Textbooks: A questionable means to an unknown end’, in BarojasJ., ed, Cooperative Networks in Physics Education, AIP Conference Proceedings No 173, American Institute of Physics, New York, 1988, pp 253–258.
15.
ColemanL.A.HolcombD.F.RigdenJ.S., ‘The Introductory University Physics Project 1987–1995’, American Journal of Physics, Vol 66, No 2, 1990, pp 124–137.
16.
RothenbergA.HausmanC.R., eds, The Creativity Question, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, 1976.
17.
BodenM. A., The Creative Mind – Myths and Mechanism, Abacus, London, 1992.
18.
WeisbergR.W.Creativity: Beyond the Myth of Genius, Freeman, New York, 1993.
19.
SharplesM., How We Write – Writing as a Creative Design, Routledge, London and New York, 1999.
20.
FinkeR.A.WardT.B.SmithS.M., Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.
21.
BailinS., ‘Creativity, discovery, and science education: Kuhn and Feyerabend revisited’, Int erchange, Vol 21, No 3, 1990, pp 34–44.
22.
BarojasJ.CárdenasF.GarcíaJ.RuizS.SotoC.VillaJ., Problemario de Mecánica (Problems in Mechanics), Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana – Iztapalapa, México, 1993.
