Science Parks from a University Perspective

Abstract

In the context of the changing role of universities and the increasing emphasis on their function in the regional economy, the author assesses the establishment and development of the UK's science parks from the universities' perspective. Identifying the science park as a key instrument for the successful engagement of a university with its local community, he looks at the impact of parks on the processes of invention, innovation, technology transfer, commercialization and enterprise. He then outlines the three strategies available to a university for involvement in science park development – from high to low cost and high to low control. Finally, the author considers the influences on successful park development of the social, business and technological environments. He concludes that the mission of universities, together with their changing role, requires them to be the cohesive force in the learning region. The science park is a means of turning this concept into reality.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Excellence and Opportunity – a Science and Innovation Policy for the 21st Century, CM 4814, The Stationery Office, London, 2000.

The National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education, Higher Education in the Learning Society (The Dearing Report), Main Report, HMSO, London, July 1997, at p 7, para 1.1.

Investing in Universities and Colleges for Global Success: A Climate for Renewal, Committee of Vice Chancellors and Principals for the Universities of the United Kingdom (CVCP) – UK-Wide Submission to the Spending Review 2000, London, December 1999, at p 5, para 1.

Parry

M.J.

, ‘Strategic issues and partnerships’, in Parry

M.J.

Russell

, eds, The Planning, Development and Operation of Science Parks, UKSPA, London, October 2000, chapter 2.

op cit, Ref 2.

Stability and Steady Growth for Britain, Pre-Budget Report, HM Treasury, London, November 1999, at p 5, para 1.29.

Op cit, Ref 2, at p 4, Bullet 7, HMSO, London, July 1997.

Higher Education for the 21st Century – Response to the Dearing Report, Department for Education and Employment, London, 1998.

The Learning Age – a Renaissance for a New Britain, Department for Education and Employment, London, 1998.

10.

Modernising Higher Education – Facing the Global Challenge, speech by the Rt Hon David Blunkett, MP, Secretary of State for Education and Employment, 15 February 2000.

11.

Building a World Class Region – An Economic Strategy for the South East of England, SEEDA (South East England Development Agency), Guildford, October 1999, Section B.

12.

Building Partnerships for Prosperity: Sustainable Growth, Competitiveness and Employment in the English Regions, White Paper, Department of Transport and the Regions, London, December 1997, at chapter 4, 4.5.

13.

Planning for Clusters, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London, 2000.

14.

Draft Regional Planning Guidance for the South East (RPG 9), Government for the South East, Government Office of the East of England, Government Office for London, The Stationery Office, December 2000.

15.

Rowe

Webster

, ‘Interface with the university or centre of technology’, in Parry

M.J.

Russell

, eds, The Planning, Development and Operation of Science Parks, UKSPA, London, October 2000, chapter 7, p 119.

16.

Our Competitive Future: Building the Knowledge Driven Economy, the Government's Competitiveness White Paper, Department of Trade and Industry, London, December 1998.

17.

See, for example, Parry

M.J.

Russell

, eds, The Planning, Development and Operation of Science Parks, UKSPA, London, October 2000.

18.

Cambridge Phenomenon Revisited, Segal Quince Wicksteed, Cambridge, 2000.

19.

Cambridge Phenomenon – the Growth of High Technology Industry in a University Town, Segal Quince Wicksteed, Cambridge, 1985.

20.

op cit, Ref 18.

21.

The KONVER programme of the European Union provides support for economic diversification in areas that are heavily dependent on the defence sector and that are consequently suffering from reductions in defence expenditure. The programme focuses on the conversion of economic activities associated with the sector to make the region less dependent on it, and on the encouragement of commercially viable activities in all industrial sectors, excepting activities that may have military applications.

22.

Spin-offs and Start-ups in UK Universities, CVCP, London, August 2000, at p 5, para 4.