Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In this paper the authors present an analysis of UK cereal growers' use and perceptions of different methods of technology transfer, together with their preferences for methods of receiving technical information in the future. Data were collected through individual face-to-face interviews with 79 cereal growers. Using the variables, farm size, age and education, growers have been classified into eight homogeneous groups. Each group's preference for means of receiving information about new developments in crop husbandry in the near future is identified. Younger growers who have undertaken further or higher education and who have large farms would prefer to receive information from a variety of sources including independent advisers, Home-Grown Cereals Authority (HGCA) literature, conferences, roadshows and local agronomy groups. By contrast, older growers who have small farms and have not undertaken further or higher education have a preference for receiving information from the farming press, other growers and merchants' representatives.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Jones

, ‘The diffusion of agricultural innovations’, Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 15, 1963, pp 387–409.

Gasson

, Socio-Economic Determinants of the Level and Rate of on-Farm Innovation: Volume One, A Review of the Literature, MAFF OCS 945A, Wye College, Ashford, 1996.

Ibid.

Roling

, Extension Science. Wye Studies in Agricultural and Rural Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988.

Biscoe

P.V.

, HGCA: The Challenge of Technology Transfer: Management Through Understanding, Research into Practice, Proceedings of the Sixth HGCA R&D Conference on Cereals and Oilseeds, Robinson College, Cambridge, 8–9 January 1998, pp 8.1–8.12.

Griliches

, ‘Hybrid corn: An exploration in the economics of technological change’, Econometrica, Vol 25, 1957, pp 501–523.

Neagtu

Parikh

, ‘The impact of perception and other factors on the adoption of agricultural technology in the Moret and Jiru Woreda (district) of Ethiopia’, Agricultural Economics, Vol 21, 1999, pp 205–216.

Ghadim

A.K.A.

Pannell

D.J.

, ‘A conceptual framework of adoption of an agricultural innovation’, Agricultural Economics, Vol 21, 1999, pp 145–154.

Ibid.

10.

Polson

R.A.

Spencer

D.S.C.

, ‘The technology adoption process in subsistence agriculture: The case of cassava in southwestern Nigeria’, Agricultural Systems, Vol 36, 1991, pp 65–78.

11.

Burton

Rigby

Young

, ‘Analysis of the determinants of adoption of organic horticultural techniques in the UK’, Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 50, 1999, pp 48–63.

12.

All growers in the sample were male, hence the reference to the male gender only throughout the remainder of this paper.

13.

Gasson , op cit, Ref 2.

14.

Roling , op cit, Ref 4.

15.

Osgood

C.E.

Suci

G.J.

Tannernbaum

P.H.

, The Measurement of Meaning, University of Illinois Press, Champaign, IL, 1957.

16.

The full set of mean scores is available from the corresponding author upon request.

Identifying the Audience and the Media of Communication: Targeting Technology Transfer in the UK Cereals Industry

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References