School counselors write letters of recommendation for students pursuing postsecondary education and help teachers and staff prepare for this task. Although letters of recommendation may impact admission and scholarship opportunities, research about equity and bias in letters is minimal as compared to standardized tests, teacher expectations, and grading practices. In this study, researchers analyzed letters of recommendation for evidence of gender and racial bias. Results demonstrate small but significant differences by gender and race in the average length of letters as well as the types of language used to describe students. This article discusses implications for school counselors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkosP., LambieG., & MilsomA. (2007). Early adolescents' aspirations and academic tracking: An exploratory investigation. Professional School Counseling, 11, 57–64. doi:10.5330/PSC.n.2010–11.57
2.
American School Counselor Association. (2012). ASCA National Model: A framework for school counseling programs.Alexandria, VA: Author.
3.
AzenR., BronnerS., & GafniN. (2002). Examination of gender bias in university admissions. Applied Measurement in Education, 15(1), 75–94. doi:10.1207/S15324818AME1501_05
4.
BelascoA. (2013). Creating college opportunity: School counselors and their influence on postsecondary enrollment. Research in Higher Education, 54, 781–804. doi:10.10007/s111620013–9297–4.
5.
BergenD. J., & WilliamsJ. E. (1991). Sex stereotypes in the United States revisited: 1972–1988. Sex Roles, 24, 413–423.
6.
BoutonL. F. (1995). A cross-cultural analysis of the structure and content of letters of reference. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 211–244. doi:10.1017/S0272263100014169
7.
CejkaM. A., & EaglyA. H. (1999). Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 413–423. doi:10.1177/0146167299025004002
8.
ClinedinstM., HurleyS., & HawkinsD. (2011). State of college admission 2011.Washington, DC: National Association for College Admissions.
DevineP. G., & ElliotA. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 21(11), 1139–1150. doi:10.1177/01461672952111002
11.
DevineP. G., PlantE. A., & BuswellB. N. (2000). Breaking the prejudice habit: progress and obstacles. In OskampS. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 185–208). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
12.
EaglyA. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
EaglyA. H., WoodW., & DiekmanA. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In EckesT. & TrautnerH. M. (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
14.
FeingoldA. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429–456. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.116.3.429
15.
FergusonR. F. (1998). Teachers' perceptions and expectations and the black-white test score gap. In JencksC. and PhillipsM. (Eds.), The black-white test score gap (pp. 273–317). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
16.
FreedleR. (2003). Correcting the SAT's ethnic and social-class bias: A method for reestimating SAT scores. Harvard Educational Review, 73(1), 1–44. doi:10.17763/haer.73.1.8465k88616hn4757
17.
HarrisE. A. (2014, December 26). Little guidance: 500 students per counselor. New York Times, pp. A1-A3.
18.
JonesD. (1990). College letters of recommendation: A staff development opportunity. School Counselor, 90, 153–156.
19.
KiteM. E., DeauxK., & HainesE. L. (2007). Gender stereotypes. In DenmarkF. L. & PaludiM. A. (Eds.), Psychology of women: A handbook of issues and theories (pp. 205–236). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
20.
KnouseS. B. (1983). The letter of recommendation: Specificity and favorability of information. Personnel Psychology, 36, 331–341. doi:10.1111/j.17446570.1983.tb01441.x
21.
KuncelN., KochevarR., & OnesD. (2014). A meta-analysis of letters of recommendation in college and graduate admissions: Reasons for hope. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22(1), 101–108. doi:10.1111/ijsa.12060
22.
LaCroixP. (1985). Sex in recs: Gender bias in recommendation writing. Journal of College Admissions, 108, 24–26.
23.
LemmK. & BanajiM. R. (1999). Unconscious attitudes and beliefs about women and men. In PaseroU. & BraunF. (Eds.), Perceiving and performing gender (pp. 215–233). Opladen, Germany: Westdutscher Verlag.
24.
LueptowL. B., Garovich-SzaboL., & LueptowM. B. (2001). Social change and the persistence of sex typing: 1974–1997. Social Forces, 80, 1–36. doi:10.1353/sof.2001.0077
25.
MaderaJ. M., HeblM. R., & MartinR. C. (2009). Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1591–1599. doi:10.1037/a0016539
26.
McKownC., & WeinsteinR. S. (2008). Teacher expectations, classroom context, and the achievement gap. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 235–261. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2007.05.001
27.
National Association for College Admissions Counselors. (2012). Fundamentals of college admissions counseling (3rd ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.
28.
National Association for College Admissions Counselors. (2014). State of college admissions report.Arlington, VA: Author.
29.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2004). Trends in educational equity of girls and women. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/equity/Section4.asp doi:10.1177/0957926503014002277
30.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). Historical summary of faculty, students, degrees, and finances in degree-granting institutions: Selected years, 1869–70 through 2005–06. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d07/tables/dt07_178.asp
NosekB. A., BanajiM. R., & GreenwaldA. G. (2002). Math = Male, Me = Female, Therefore Math <> Me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 44–59.
33.
NosekB. A., SymthF. L., HansenJ. J., DevosT., LindnerN. M., RanganathK. A., … BanajiM.R. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 1–53. doi:10.1080/10463280701489053
34.
PennebakerJ. W., FrancisM. E., & BoothR. J. (2001). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC 2001): A computerized text analysis program.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35.
ReynaC. (2008). Ian is intelligent but Leshaun is lazy: Antecedents and consequences of attributional stereotypes in the classroom. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XXIII, 439–458. doi:10.1007/BF03172752
36.
RudmanL. A., & GlickP. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle-managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004–1010.
37.
RudmanL. A., & GlickP. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743–762.
38.
SchmaderT., WhiteheadJ., & WysockiV. H. (2007). A linguistic comparison of letters of recommendation for male and female chemistry and biochemistry job applicants. Sex Roles, 57, 509–514. doi:10.1007/s11199–007–9291–4
39.
SwimJ. K., & SannaL. J. (1996). He's skilled, she's lucky: A meta-analysis of observers' attributions for women's and men's successes and failures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 507–519.
40.
TrixF., & PsenkaC. (2003). Exploring the color of glass: Letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse and Society, 14, 191–220.
41.
ValianV. (1998). Why so slow? The advancement of women.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42.
Von BargenD. (2014). Tips for writing letters of recommendation. ASCA School Counselor, D5-D7.
43.
WoodW., & EaglyA. H. (2010). Gender. In FiskeS. T., GilbertD. T., & LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 629–667). New York, NY: Wiley.
