Abstract
Purpose
During retinal angiography a fluorescein-induced allergic reaction is rare but possible.
Methods
We report a single retrospective clinical case.
Results
During retinal angiography on a 75-year-old man, an unexpected allergic reaction to fluorescein (FL) dye occurred. At the beginning of the exam, we erroneously took some filtered shots of the patient's face. We noticed that the pictures of the patient's skin using the FL and indocyanine green filters revealed dye accumulation before the clinical appearance of hives.
Conclusions
Taking filtered shots of a patient's face could be an original method to promptly detect and easily document allergic hives, by simply using an angiographic device.
Introduction
In retinal angiography, two dyes are injected and a series of picture of the retina are taken using two different filters to isolate the fluorescence of fluorescein (FL) and indocyanine green (ICG) (1). An allergic reaction to FL is a rare adverse event (2).
Patient presentation
During retinal angiography on a 75-year-old man, an unexpected allergic reaction to FL dye occurred. At the beginning of the exam, we erroneously took some filtered shots of the patient's face. Interestingly, we noticed that pictures of the patient's skin using both the FL and ICG filters revealed dye accumulation before the clinical appearance of hives (Fig. 1). In the left image, the areas where the hives subsequently developed clearly appeared with the ICG filter. In the right image, the same shot with the FL filter revealed the corresponding areas as slightly whitish spots. After 3-4 minutes, the patient developed typical cutaneous hives and was diagnosed with an allergic reaction. With the appropriate treatment, a prompt resolution of the complication was obtained.

Face shots of a patient taken during an allergic skin reaction. In the left image, areas where clinically detectable hives subsequently developed appeared clearly with indocyanine green angiography filter (arrows). In the right image, the same shot with a fluorescein angiography filter revealed the corresponding areas as slightly whitish spots (arrows).
Conclusions
Hive lesions begin when cutaneous mast cells and basophils release histamine and other inflammatory mediators at the skin surface. The mast cells are stimulated to release these chemicals when immunoglobulin E antibodies bind to an allergen and effectively flag it up as a foreign body. Histamine triggers the dilation of the blood vessels across the skin, leading to its warm and reddish appearance (3). It is likely that the augmented blood levels in the hive areas generate a staining of both the ICG and FL dyes (4). Considering the relative transparence of keratin-rich epidermis layers, dye-staining spots were detected in our filtered images even before the clinical development of hives.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report describing the possibility of documenting the staining of dye responsible for the allergic reaction before the development of hives, by means of a standard angiographic device (Spectralis + Heidelberg Retina Angiograph, Heidelberg Engineering). We suggest that the simple procedure of taking face shots with dye filters during retinal angiography may help to detect an allergic reaction at the early stage of its development, thus allowing prompt treatment. Comparing some shots taken before and after the injection of dye could help to prevent the misdiagnosis of hives, when, in fact, there are some preexisting areas of skin vasodilation.
Footnotes
Financial support: None.
Conflict of interest: None.
