Abstract
Background
The role of the HeRO graft in central venous pathology has been defined in the literature and clinically. There have been two publications or abstracts that have compared the patency rates and outcomes of this graft to the lower extremity graft.
Aim
The outcomes of both publications leads to an algorithm suggested by the author in determining which procedure should be used for specific patients.
Methods
Both papers trend to show that lower extremity grafts have improved patency rates when compared to the HeRO device in the upper extremity.
Discussion
The author will use these data to demonstrate that in younger patients and in patients with low morbidity and mortality, salvaging the upper extremity area for access may show that the HeRO device provides benefit for these patients.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.