Abstract
Purpose
We retrospectively evaluated the surgical outcome of revising vascular access related aneurysms (VARAs) to salvage dialysis access.
Methods
Twenty-six consecutive hemodialysis patients (mean age 67.6 years, range: 32-89 years) who presented with true or false VARA and underwent surgery between January 2006 and February 2011 were enrolled in this study, and comprised 11 women and 15 men. Aneurysms were true in 21 patients and false in five; native arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) were reported in 23, including one infected native pseudoaneurysm, and arteriovenous prosthetic grafts (AVGs) in three. The mean aneurysm diameter was 29.8 ±8.0 mm, ranging from 18 to 50 mm. Indications of surgical intervention were local pain, rapid enlargement of the aneurysm, and AVF failure due to stenosis. Surgical revision was performed by resection of VARA and concomitant creation of a new proximal arteriovenous anastomosis in 18 patients.
Results
Two aneurysms were ruptured by blunt dissection; however, bleeding did not occur due to prior clamping of the inflow artery without hemodynamic compromise. VARA plication was performed in one case in which severe calcified VARA could not be incised. No significant complications were reported, except for delayed wound healing in three patients and minor peripheral neuropathy in five. The postoperative course was uneventful without hospital mortality in all patients with VARA.
Conclusions
Aggressive surgical management of VARAs is likely to become an acceptable procedure to salvage dialysis access and consistently maintain AVF or AVG function.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.