Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters in Critically Ill Premature Neonates

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the safety of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) and their complications in critically ill premature neonates.

Methods

A retrospective collection of data of infants with very low birth weight (VLBW) who underwent PICC placement over a 2-year period. Gestational age, birth weight (BW), sex, site of catheter placement, reason for catheter removal, duration of the catheter use, proven sepsis, type of the reported organism and the rate of complications were collected. The infants were classified into two groups according to BWs: Group 1–-VLBW infants (BW between 1,000 and 1,500 g) and Group 2–-BW <1,000 g (extremely low birth weight, ELBW group).

Results

During the study period, 90 VLBW infants were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. PICCs were attempted in 71 patients. A PICC was successfully inserted into 62 patients (87.3%). Totally, 68 PICCs were inserted into 62 infants. PICCs placed in either the upper or the lower extremity have no differences in complication rates. The median time of catheter insertion was 10 (1-22) days for Group 1 and 16 (1-47) days for Group 2 (p=0.001). The median duration of PICCs was 9 (2-18) and 12.0 (3-30) days, respectively (p=0.012). There were no significant differences between groups for the reasons for removal (p=0.859).

Conclusions

PICCs are convenient for the administration of long course antibiotics and parenteral nutrition for both VLBW and ELBW infants. The risk of catheter complications did not increase in ELBW infants. Although the technique of insertion is easy and using PICCs has many benefits, serious and fatal complications may occur in premature neonates in critical states.

Keywords

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Liossis

, Bardin

, Papageorgiou

Comparison of risks from percutaneous central venous catheters and peripheral lines in infants of extremely low birth weight: a cohort controlled study of infants <1000 g.

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003; 13(3): 171–174.

Neubauer

A.P.

Percutaneous central i.v. access in the neonate: experience with 535 silastic catheters.

Acta Paediatr. 1995; 84(7): 756–760.

Infusion Nurses Society.

Infusion nursing standards of practice.

J Infus Nurs. 2006; 29(1 Suppl): S1–S92.

Paulson

P.R.

, Miller

K.M.

Neonatal peripherally inserted central catheters: recommendations for prevention of insertion and postinsertion complications.

Neonatal Netw. 2008; 27(4): 245–257.

Ohki

, Yoshizawa

, Watanabe

, Kuwashima

, Morikawa

Complications of percutaneously inserted central venous catheters in Japanese neonates.

Pediatr Int. 2008; 50(5): 636–639.

Horan

T.C.

, Andrus

, Dudeck

M.A.

CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting.

Am J Infect Control. 2008; 36(5): 309–332.

Janes

, Kalyn

, Pinelli

, Hamilton

B.P.

A randomized trial comparing peripherally inserted central venous catheters and peripheral intravenous catheters in infants with very low birth weight.

J Pediatr Surg. 2000; 35(7): 1040–1044.

Bulbul

, Okan

, Nuhoglu

Percutaneously inserted central catheters in the newborns: a center's experience in Turkey.

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010; 23(6): 529–535.

Hsu

J.F.

, Tsai

M.H.

, Huang

H.R.

, Lien

, Chu

S.M.

, Huang

C.B.

Risk factors of catheter-related bloodstream infection with percutaneously inserted central venous catheters in very low birth weight infants: a center's experience in Taiwan.

Pediatr Neonatol. 2010; 51(6): 336–342.

10.

Darling

J.C.

, Newell

S.J.

, Mohamdee

, Uzun

, Cullinane

C.J.

, Dear

P.R.

Central venous catheter tip in the right atrium: a risk factor for neonatal cardiac tamponade.

J Perinatol. 2001; 21(7): 461–464.

11.

Stolfi

, Boccanera

, Chiara

Central venous lines and how to manage them.

Early Hum Dev. 2009; 85(10 Suppl): S83–S84.

12.

Franceschi

A.T.

, da Cunha

M.L.

Adverse events related to the use of central venous catheters in hospitalized newborns.

Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2010; 18(2): 196–202.

13.

Borghesi

, Stronati

Strategies for the prevention of hospital-acquired infections in the neonatal intensive care unit.

J Hosp Infect. 2008; 68(4): 293–300.

14.

Suresh

G.K.

, Edwards

W.H.

Central line-associated bloodstream infections in neonatal intensive care: changing the mental model from inevitability to preventability.

Am J Perinatol. 2012; 29(1): 57–64.

15.

Klein

J.F.

, Shahrivar

Use of percutaneous silastic central venous catheters in neonates and the management of infectious complications.

Am J Perinatol. 1992; 9(4): 261–264.

16.

Parellada

J.A.

, Moïse

A.A.

, Hegemier

, Gest

A.L.

Percutaneous central catheters and peripheral intravenous catheters have similar infection rates in very low birth weight infants.

J Perinatol. 1999; 19(4): 251–254.

17.

Cairns

P.A.

, Wilson

D.C.

, McClure

B.G.

, Halliday

H.L.

, McReid

Percutaneous central venous catheter use in the very low birth weight neonate.

Eur J Pediatr. 1995; 154(2): 145–147.

18.

Hoang

, Sills

, Chadler

, Busalani

, Clifton-Koeppel

, Modanlou

H.D.

Percutaneously inserted central catheter for total parenteral nutrition in neonates: complications rates related to upper versus lower extremity insertion.

Pediatrics. 2008; 121(5): 1152–1159.

19.

Mahieu

L.M.

, De Muynck

A.O.

, Ieven

M.M.

, De Dooy

J.J.

, Goossens

H.J.

, Van Reempts

P.J.

Risk factors for central vascular catheter-associated bloodstream infections among patients in a neonatal intensive care unit.

J Hosp Infect. 2001; 48(2): 108–116.

20.

Golombek

S.G.

, Rohan

A.J.

, Parvez

, Salice

A.L.

, LaGamma

E.F.

“Proactive” management of percutaneously inserted central catheters results in decreased incidence of infection in the ELBW population.

J Perinatol. 2002; 22(3): 209–213.

21.

Aly

, Herson

, Duncan

Is bloodstream infection preventable among premature infants? A tale of two cities.

Pediatrics. 2005; 115(6): 1513–1518.

22.

Schelonka

R.L.

, Scruggs

, Nichols

, Dimmitt

R.A.

, Carlo

W.A.

Sustained reductions in neonatal nosocomial infection rates following a comprehensive infection control intervention.

J Perinatol. 2006; 26(3): 176–179.

23.

Schulman

, Stricof

, Stevens

T.P.

New York State Regional Perinatal Care Centers. Statewide NICU central-line-associated bloodstream infection rates decline after bundles and checklists.

Pediatrics. 2011; 127(3): 436–444.