Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Purpose

International policy statements from the US and the UK recommend real-time ultrasound guidance (USG) for placement of central venous catheters (CVCs) to improve patient safety. The evidence to support USG for the internal jugular (IJ) route is unequivocal; however, there is conflicting data on the effectiveness of USG in visualization of the subclavian vein (SCV). This study sought to determine whether body mass index (BMI) or clavicle shape affected SCV visualization with USG.

Methods

Forty-one emergency department patients were enrolled. Subject height and weight were recorded for BMI calculation. The clavicle shape was recorded as either flat or protuberant. USG was performed to identify the SCV vein in both the transverse and sagittal views. The ability to visualize the vein was rated on a three point rubric scale.

Results

One subject had an underweight BMI, 18 a normal BMI, 12 an overweight BMI, and 10 an obese BMI. The improvement in the odds ratio (OR) of the ability to see the SCV in subjects with a normal compared to overweight/obese BMI was statistically significant (transverse view unadjusted OR=18.0 (95% CI 3.21 – 100.94), P=.001 and adjusted for a flat clavicle OR=10.54 (95% CI 1.41 – 78.37), P=.021).

Conclusions

Higher BMI and the presence of a flat clavicle limit the ability to visualize the SCV. These findings may help account for why USG for placement of SCV CVCs is less utilized. However, patients with a low/normal BMI and protuberant clavicle may benefit from USG when attempting SCV CVCs.

Keywords

Central venous catheter Obesity Subclavian vein Ultrasonography

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Botha

, van Schoor

A.N.

, Boon

J.M.

, Becker

J.H.R.

, Meiring

J.H.

Anatomical considerations of the anterior approach for central venous catheter placement. Clin Anat.

Mar 2006; 19(2): 101–105.

Barsuk

J.H.

, McGaghie

W.C.

, Cohen

E.R.

, O'Leary

K.J.

, Wayne

D.B.

Simulation-based mastery learning reduces complications during central venous catheter insertion in a medical intensive care unit.

Crit Care Med. 2009; 37(10): 2697–2701.

Gualtieri

, Deppe

S.A.

, Sipperly

M.E.

, Thompson

D.R.

Subclavian venous catheterization: greater success rate for less experienced operators using ultrasound guidance.

Crit Care Med. 1995; 23(4): 692–697.

Skolnick

M.L.

The role of sonography in the placement and management of jugular and subclavian central venous catheters.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994; 163(2): 291–295.

Karakitsos

, Labropoulos

, De Groot

. Real-time ultrasound-guided catheterisation of the internal jugular vein: a prospective comparison with the landmark technique in critical care patients. Crit Care 2006; 10(6): R162.

Bodenham

A.R.

Can you justify not using ultrasound guidance for central venous access?[comment].

Crit Care. 2006; 10(6): 1.

Guidance on the use of ultrasound locating devices for placing central venous catheters. London, UK: National Institutes for Excellence; 2002.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2001). Making Health Care Safer: A Critical Analysis of Patient Safety Practices. Chapter 21. Ultrasound Guidance of Central Vein Catheterization. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment: Number 43. AHRQ Publication No. 01-E058. Retrieved July 19, 2007 from http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/ptsafety/.

Griswold-Theodorson

, Hannan

, Handly

. Improving patient safety with ultrasonography guidance during internal jugular central venous catheter placement by novice practitioners. Simul Healthc. 2009; 4(4): 212–216.

10.

Caridi

J.G.

, Hawkins

I.F.

Jr. , Wiechmann

B.N.

, Pevarski

D.J.

, Tonkin

J.C.

Sonographic guidance when using the right internal jugular vein for central vein access.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998; 171(5): 5.

11.

Gann

Jr. , Sardi

Improved results using ultrasound guidance for central venous access.

Am Surg. 2003; 69(12): 1104–1107.

12.

Hind

, Calvert

, McWilliams

. Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003; 327(7411): 361.

13.

Randolph

A.G.

, Cook

D.J.

, Gonzales

C.A.

, Pribble

C.G.

Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of the literature.

Crit Care Med. 1996; 24(12): 2053–2058.

14.

Fragou

, Gravvanis

, Dimitriou

. Real-time ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation versus the landmark method in critical care patients: a prospective randomized study. Crit Care Med. 2011; 39(7): 1607–1612.

15.

Dashe

J.S.

, McIntire

D.D.

, Twickler

D.M.

Maternal obesity limits the ultrasound evaluation of fetal anatomy.

J Ultrasound Med. 2009; 28(8): 1025–1030.

16.

Stiffler

K.A.

, Jwayyed

, Wilber

S.T.

, Robinson

The use of ultrasound to identify pertinent landmarks for lumbar puncture.

Am J Emerg Med. 2007; 25(3): 331–334.

17.

Gordon

J.A.

, Alexander

E.K.

, Lockley

S.W.

. Does simulator-based clinical performance correlate with actual hospital behavior? The effect of extended work hours on patient care provided by medical interns. Acad Med 2010; 85: 1583–1588.

18.

Theodoro

, Krauss

, Kollef

, Evanoff

Risk factors for acute adverse events during ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation in the emergency department.

Acad Emerg Med. 2010; 17(10): 1055–1061.

19.

Flegal

K.M.

, Carroll

M.D.

, Ogden

C.L.

, Curtin

L.R.

Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008.

JAMA. 2010; 303(3): 235–241.

20.

Balls

, LoVecchio

, Kroeger

. Ultrasound guidance for central venous catheter placement: results from the Central Line Emergency Access Registry Database. Am J Emerg Med. 2010; 28(5): 561–567.

Obesity Hinders Ultrasound Visualization of the Subclavian Vein: Implications for Central Venous Access