Custom 3D-printed triflange acetabular cages are a new option in the armamentarium of the revision hip surgeon. This review article defines this technology, its indications, surgical method, advantages, disadvantages, use, current published literature and future applications.
SchreursB.W., Te StroetM.A., RijnenW.H., GardeniersJ.W.Acetabular re-revision with impaction bone grafting and a cemented polyethylene cup; a biological option for successive reconstructions.Hip Int.2015; 25(1): 44–49.
2.
BerryD.J., SutherlandC.J., TrousdaleR.T.Bilobed oblong porous coated acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty.Clin Orthop Relat Res.2000; 371: 154–160.
3.
LingarajK., TeoY.H., BergmanN.The management of severe acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty using modular porous metal components.J Bone Joint Surg Br.2009; 91(12): 1555–1560.
4.
PaproskyW.G., PeronaP.G., LawrenceJ.M.Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty.1994; 9(1): 33–44.
5.
GrappioloG., LoppiniM., LongoU.G., TraversoF., MazziottaG., DenaroV.Trabecular Metal Augments for the Management of Paprosky Type III Defects Without Pelvic Discontinuity.J Arthroplasty.2015; 30(6): 1024–1029.
6.
SporerS.M., Della ValleC.Porous metal augments: big hopes for big holes.Orthopedics.2010; 33(9): 651.
7.
DaviesJ.H., LaflammeG.Y., DelisleJ., FernandesJ.Trabecular metal used for major bone loss in acetabular hip revision.J Arthroplasty.2011; 26(8): 1245–1250.
8.
BrownN.M., HellmanM., HaughomB.H., ShahR.P., SporerS.M., PaproskyW.G.Acetabular distraction: an alternative approach to pelvic discontinuity in failed total hip replacement.Bone Joint J.2014; 96(11)(Supple A): 73–77.
9.
BorlandW.S., BhattacharyaR., HollandJ.P., BrewsterN.T.Use of poroustrabecular metal augments with impaction bonegraftingin management of acetabular bone loss.Acta Orthop.2012; 83(4): 347–352.
10.
BrennanS.A., Ní FhoghlúC., DevittB.M., O'MahonyF.J., BrabazonD., WalshA.Silver nanoparticles and their orthopaedic applications.Bone Joint J.2015; 97(5): 582–589.
11.
WafaH., GrimerR.J., ReddyK.Retrospective evaluation of the incidence of early periprosthetic infection with silver-treated endoprostheses in high-risk patients: case-control study.Bone Joint J.2015; 97(2): 252–257.
12.
GelaudeF., DemolJ., ClijmansT., DelportH.CT-based quantification of bone loss for refined classification of acetabular deficiencies: comparison of 30 Paprosky type IIIA-B cases.Bone Joint J.2013; 95(Suppl 1): 1–1.
13.
GelaudeF., ClijmansT., DelportH.Quantitative computerized assessment of the degree of acetabular bone deficiency: total radial acetabular bone loss (TrABL).Adv Orthop.2011; 2011: 494382.
14.
HoltG.E., DennisD.A.Use of custom triflanged acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty.Clin Orthop Relat Res.2004; 429: 209–214.
15.
WindMAJr., SwankM.L., SorgerJ.I.Short-term results of a custom triflange acetabular component for massive acetabular bone loss in revision THA.Orthopedics.2013; 36(3): e260–e265.
16.
TauntonM.J., FehringT.K., EdwardsP., BernasekT., HoltG.E., ChristieM.J.Pelvic discontinuity treated with custom triflange component: a reliable option.Clin Orthop Relat Res.2012; 470(2): 428–434.
17.
BerasiCCIV, BerendK.R., AdamsJ.B., RuhE.L., LombardiA.V.Jr.. Are custom triflange acetabular components effective for reconstruction of catastrophic bone loss?Clin Orthop Relat Res.2015; 473(2): 528–535.
18.
DeBoerD.K., ChristieM.J., BrinsonM.F.Revision total hip arthroplasty for pelvic discontinuity.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2007; 89(4): 835–840.
19.
ChristieM.J., BarringtonS.A., BrinsonM.F., RuhlingM.E., De BoerD.K.Bridging massive acetabular defects with the triflange cup: 2- to 9-year results.Clin Orthop Relat Res.2001; 393: 216–227.
20.
ColenS., HarakeR., De HaanJ., MulierM.A modified custom-made triflanged acetabular reconstruction ring (MCTARR) for revision hip arthroplasty with severe acetabular defects.Acta Orthop Belg.2013; 79(1): 71–75.
