In total hip replacement surgeons can choose from a various number of approaches, from posterior, lateral or direct anterior. Excellent results can be achieved with all approaches and there is no evidence for the use of a specific approach. Minimally invasive operating techniques might further contribute to that success. Early rehabilitation and functional outcome can be improved by the introduction of evidence based clinical pathways irrespective to the used approach.
BehrendHGiesingerKGiesingerJMKusterMSThe “forgotten joint” as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure.J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(3):430–436, e1.
2.
GibsonAPosterior exposure of the hip joint.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1950;32(2):183–186.
3.
BauerRKerschbaumerFPoiselSOberthalerWThe transgluteal approach to the hip joint.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1979;95(1-2):47–49.
4.
SoniRKAn anterolateral approach to the hip joint.Acta Orthop Scand. 1997;68(5):490–494.
5.
WealeAENewmanPFergusonITBannisterGCNerve injury after posterior and direct lateral approaches for hip replacement.A clinical and electrophysiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78(6):899–902.
6.
RameshMO'ByrneJMMcCarthyNJarvisAMahalinghamKCashmanWFDamage to the superior gluteal nerve after the Hardinge approach to the hip.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78(6):903–906.
7.
Smith-PetersenMNTHE CLASSIC: Evolution of Mould Arthroplasty of the Hip Joint.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:17–21.
8.
MattaJMShahrdarCFergusonTSingle-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441(441):115–124.
9.
HailerNPWeissRJStarkAKärrholmJThe risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis.An analysis of 78,098 operations in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2012;83(5):442–448.
10.
JamesonSSMasonJBakerPA Comparison of Surgical Approaches for Primary Hip Arthroplasty: A Cohort Study of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and Early Revision Using Linked National Databases.J Arthroplasty. 2013.
11.
BrooksPJDislocation following total hip replacement: causes and cures.Bone Joint J. 2013;95(11) (Suppl A):67–69.
12.
BremerAKKalbererFPfirrmannCWDoraCSoft-tissue changes in hip abductor muscles and tendons after total hip replacement: comparison between the direct anterior and the transgluteal approaches.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(7):886–889.
13.
DowningNDClarkDIHutchinsonJWColcloughKHowardPWHip abductor strength following total hip arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of the posterior and lateral approach in 100 patients.Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72(3):215–220.
14.
RoparsMMorandiXHutenDThomazeauHBertonEDarnaultPAnatomical study of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve with special reference to minimally invasive anterior approach for total hip replacement.Surg Radiol Anat. 2009;31(3):199–204.
15.
BerginPFDoppeltJDKephartCJComparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(15):1392–1398.
16.
MartinCTPugelyAJGaoYClarkCRA comparison of hospital length of stay and short-term morbidity between the anterior and the posterior approaches to total hip arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(5):849–854.
17.
NakataKNishikawaMYamamotoKHirotaSYoshikawaHA clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach: two consecutive series.J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(5):698–704.
18.
DorrLDMaheshwariAVLongWTWanZSirianniLEEarly pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty.A prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(6):1153–1160.
19.
GoosenJHKollenBJCasteleinRMKuipersBMVerheyenCCMinimally invasive versus classic procedures in total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(1):200–208.
20.
MolliRGLombardiAVJrBerendKRAdamsJBSnellerMAA short tapered stem reduces intraoperative complications in primary total hip arthroplasty.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(2):450–461.
21.
KehletHDahlJBAnaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery.Lancet. 2003;362(9399):1921–1928.
22.
SpaansAJvan den HoutJABolderSBHigh complication rate in the early experience of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty by the direct anterior approach.Acta Orthop. 2012;83(4):342–346.
