To evaluate ocular surface changes in long-term silicone hydrogel contact lens wearers.
Methods
Thirty patients were included in this study. Twenty patients (40 eyes) using contact lenses constituted group 1 and 10 (20 eyes) volunteers constituted group 2. The duration of average contact lens usage was 7.74±3.3 years. Ocular surface was evaluated by surface staining, tear film break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer I test, and conjunctival impression cytology with color-coded mapping technique and by the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI).
Results
The mean break-up time was lower and staining scores were higher in group 1 (p<0.001) but Schirmer values were not significantly different from group 2 (p>0.05). The mean OSDI score was 34.59±11.93 to 19.28±6.7 in group 1 and 2. Increased metaplastic predominant changes of grade II and III were observed in the interpalpebral and perilimbal areas in group 1. Significant correlations were observed in TBUT, cornea staining, and grade II to grade III metaplasia ratios between duration of the lens usage and contact lens wear time in a day.
Conclusions
Silicone hydrogel lenses produce significant changes on tear film and impression cytology of the ocular surface in long-term use.
KnopE., BrewittH.Induction of epithelial conjunctival epithelial alteration by contact lens wearing: a prospective study.Ger J Ophthalmol1992; 1: 125–34.
10.
KnopE., BrewittH.Conjunctival cytology in asymptomatic wearers of soft contact lenses.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol1992; 230: 340–7.
11.
GreneR.B., LankstonP.Cartography of impression cytology.Cornea1990; 9: 275–8.
12.
SengörT., GürdalC., KirimliogluH., IrkeçM., AydinS.Colour-coded mapping technique in impression cytology: findings in soft contact lens wearers and patients with other external eye diseases.Ophthalmologica2002; 216: 155–8.
13.
SallK., StevensonO.D., MundorfT.K., ReisB.L.Two multicenter, randomized studies of the efficacy and safety of cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion in moderate to severe dry eye disease: CsA Phase 3 Study Group.Ophthalmology2000; 107: 631–9.
14.
WaltJ.G., RoweM.M., SternK.L.Evaluating the functional impact of dry eye: the Ocular Surface Disease Index.Drug Inf J1997; 31: 1436.
15.
LempM.A.Report of the National Eye Institute /Industry Workshop on clinical trials in dry eyes.CLAO J1995; 21: 222–32.
16.
NicholsJ.J., ZieglerC., MitchellG.L., NicholsK.K.Self-reported dry eye disease across refractive modalities.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2005; 46: 1911–4.
17.
FarrisR.L.The dry eye: its mechanisms and therapy, with evidence that contact lens is a cause.CLAO J1986; 12: 234–46.
18.
EfronN., BrennanN.A.A survey of wearers of low water content hydrogel contact lenses.Clin Exp Optom1988; 71: 86–90.
19.
ThaiL.C., TomlinsonA., DoaneM.G.Effect of contact lens materials on tear physiology.Optom Vis Sci2004; 81: 194–204.
20.
LittleS.A., BruceA.S.Postlens tear film morphology, lens movement and symptoms in hydrogel lens wearers.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt1994: 14: 65–9.
21.
BrennanN.A., JaworskiA., ShuleyV.Studies of the post-lens tear film.Optom Vis Sci2001: 78: 51.
22.
YoungG., EfronN.Characteristics of the pre-lens tear film during hydrogel contact lens wear.Ophthal Physiol Opt1991: 11: 53–8.
23.
KorbD.R.Tear film-contact lens interactions.Adv Exp Med Biol1994; 350: 403–10.
24.
PritchardN., FonnD.Dehydration, lens movement and dryness ratings of hydrogel contact lenses.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt1995; 15: 281–6.
25.
AragonaP., FerreriG., MicaliA.Morphological changes of the conjunctival epithelium in contact lens wearers evaluated by impression cytology.Eye1998; 12: 461–6.
26.
ÇakmakS.S., ÜnlüK., KaracaC., NergizY., IpekS.Effects of soft contact lenses on conjunctival surface.Eye Contact Lens2003; 29: 230–3.
TomatirD.K., ErdaN., GürlüV.P.Effects of different contact lens materials and contact lens-wearing periods on conjunctival cytology in asymptomatic contact lens wearers.Eye Contact Lens2008; 34: 166–8.
KeayL., EdwardsK., StapletonF.An early assessment of silicone hydrogel safety: pearls and pitfalls, and current status.Eye Contact Lens2007; 33: 358–63.
31.
SchiffmanR.M., ChristiansonM.D., JacopsenG.Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index.Arch Ophthalmol2001; 119: 456.
32.
BegleyC.G., CafferyB., NicholsK.K., ChalmersR.Responses of contact lens wearers to a dry eye survey.Optom Vis Sci2000; 77: 40–6.
33.
NicholsJ.J., MitchellG.L., NicholsK.K., ChalmersR., BegleyC.The performance of the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire as a screening survey for contact lens-related dry eye.Cornea2002; 21: 469–75.
