ReznickR.K., MacRaeH.Teaching surgical skills–changes in the wind.
N Engl J Med.2006; 355(25):
2664–2669.
2.
EcksteinH., SchmidliJ., SchumacherH.Rationale, scope, and 20-year experience of vascular surgical
training with lifelike pulsatile flow models. J Vasc
Surg.2013; 57:
1422–1428.
3.
Di IorioB.R., MondilloF., BortoneS.Fourteen years of hemodialysis with a central venous catheter:
mechanical long-term complications. J Vasc
Access.2006; 7:
60–5.
4.
III. NKF-K/DOQI Clinical
Practice Guidelines for Vascular Access: update 2000.
Am J Kidney Dis.2001; 37(1 Suppl 1):
S137–81.
HughesS.A., MendelssohnJ.G., TobeS.W., McFarlaneP.A., MendelssohnD.C.Factors associated with suboptimal initiation of dialysis despite
early nephrologist referral. Nephrol Dial
Transplant.2013; 28:
392–7.
7.
MendelssohnD.C., EthierJ., ElderS.J.Haemodialysis vascular access problems in Canada: Results from
the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS
II). Nephrol Dial Transplant.2005; 21:
721–8.
8.
MoistL.M., TrpeskiL., NaY., LokC.E.Increased hemodialysis catheter use in Canada and associated
mortality risk: data from the Canadian Organ Replacement Registry
2001-2004. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol.2008; 3(6):
1726–32.
9.
US Renal Data System.USRDS 2005 Annual Data Report: Atlas of Endstage Renal Disease in
the United States, in Incidence and Prevalence;
Patient Characteristics.Bethesda, MD: National Institutes
of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney
Diseases, 2005.
10.
WeinhandlE.D., FoleyR.N., GilbertsonD.T., ArnesonT.J., SnyderJ.J., CollinsA.J.Propensity-matched mortality comparison of incident hemodialysis
and peritoneal dialysis patients. J Am Soc
Nephrol.2010; 21:
499–506.
11.
GolperT.A., GuestS., GlickmanJ.D., TurkJ., PulliamJ.P.Home dialysis in the new USA bundled payment plan: implications
and impact. Perit Dial Int.2011; 31:
12–6.
12.
TumlinJ.A., ChawlaL., TolwaniA.J.The effect of the selective cytopheretic device on acute kidney
injury outcomes in the intensive care unit: a multicenter pilot
study. Semin Dial.2013; 26:
616–23.
13.
PonceD., BerbelM.N., Regina de
GoesC., AlmeidaC.T., BalbiA.L.High-volume peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury:
indications and limitations. Clin J Am Soc
Nephrol.2012; 7:
887–94.
KhanA., RigattoC., VerrelliM.High rates of mortality and technique failure in peritoneal
dialysis patients after critical illness. Perit Dial
Int.2012; 32:
29–36.
16.
HagenS.M., LafrancaJ.A., IJzermansJ.N., DorF.J.A systematic review and meta-analysis of the influence of
peritoneal dialysis catheter type on complication rate and catheter
survival. Kidney Int.2014; 85:
920–32.
17.
DaviesS.J.Peritoneal dialysis—current status and future
challenges. Nature Rev Nephrol2013; 9:
399–408.
18.
SinghN., DavidsonI., MinhajuddinA.Risk factors associated with peritoneal dialysis catheter
survival: a 9-year single-center study in 315 patients.
J Vasc Access.2010; 11:
316–322.
19.
Di PaoloN., CapotondoL., SansoniE.The self-locating catheter: Clinical experience and
follow-up. Perit Dial Int2004; 24:
359–364.
20.
StrippoliG.F., TongA., JohnsonD., SchenaF.P., CraigJ.C.Catheter type, placement and insertion techniques for preventing
peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.2004 Oct 18; (4):
CD004680.
21.
StrippoliG.F., TongA., JohnsonD., SchenaF.P., CraigJ.C.Catheter-related interventions to prevent peritonitis in
peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review of randomized, controlled
trials. J Am Soc Nephrol2004; 15:
2735–2746.
FigueiredoA., GohB.L., JenkinsS.Clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal
access. Perit Dial Int2010; 30:
424–429.
24.
FrostJ.H., BagulA.A brief recap of tips and surgical manoeuvres to enhance optimal
outcome of surgically placed peritoneal dialysis catheters.
Int J Nephrol2012, Article ID 251584.
25.
HagenS.M., LafrancaJ.A., IjzermansJ.N., DorF.J.A systematic review and meta-analysis of the influence of
peritoneal dialysis catheter type on complication rate and catheter
survival. Kidney Int.2014; 85:
920–932.
26.
RossJ., DolmatchB., GallichioM.Training and Certification in Dialysis Access.
J Vasc Access2014; 15(Suppl 8):
S3–S7. www.TacidaGroup.com
27.
ZimlichR.IOM recommends decade-long overhaul of Medicare GME funding
program. Medical Economics July 30,
2014.
28.
WilenskyG., BerwickD.Reforming the financing and governance of GME.
N Engl J Med.2014; 371(9):
792–3.
29.
CMS finalizes Policy and Payment
Rate Changes for End Stage Renal Disease Facilities in 2014.
CMS.gov 11/22/2013.
30.
Comprehensive ESRD Care Initiative CMS.gov
4/16/2014.
31.
SaranR., ElderS., GoodkinD., AkibaT., EthierJ., RaynerH., SaitoA., YoungE., GillespieB., MerionR., PisoniR.Enhanced training in vascular access creation predicts
arteriovenous fistula placement and patency in hemodialysis patients:
results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns
Study. Ann Surg.2008; 247(5):
885–91.
32.
CrabtreeJ.Who should place peritoneal dialysis catheters?Perit Dial Int2010; 30:
142–150.
33.
DavidsonI., LokC., DolmatchB.Virtual reality: emerging role of simulation training in vascular
access. Semin Nephrol.2012; 32:
572–581.
34.
SlakeyD.P., SimmsE.R., RennieK.W.Using simulation to improve root cause analysis of adverse
surgical outcomes. Int J Qual Health Care.2014; 26:
144–150.
35.
ReasonJ.The Human Contribution: Unsafe Acts, Accidents and Heroic
Recoveries.Farnham Surrey, UK:
Ashgate;
2008.
GolemanD., BoyatzisB.Social intelligence and the biology of
leadership. Harvard Bus Rev.2008; 86:
74–81.
38.
GolemanD.Social Intelligence: the New Science of Human Relationships.New York, NY: Bantam
Books; 2008.
39.
LucianL. Leape, MilesF. Shore, JulesL. Dienstag,
RobertJ., MayerSusan Edgman-Levitan,
GreggS. Meyer, GeraldB. Healy. Perspective: A
Culture of Respect, Part 2: Creating a Culture of Respect.
Academic Medicine, Vol. 87, No. 7 / July
2012.
40.
RossJ., DolmatchB., GallichioM.Training and Certification in Dialysis Access.
J Vasc Access2014; 15(Suppl 8):
S3–S7. www.TacidaGroup.com
41.
SaranR., ElderS.J., GoodkinD.A.Enhanced training in vascular access creation predicts
arteriovenous fistula placement and patency in hemodialysis patients:
results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns
Study. Ann Surg2008; 247: 885.
42.
BeathardG.A., LitchfieldT; Physician Operators Forum of RMS
Lifeline, Inc. Effectiveness and safety of dialysis vascular
access procedures performed by interventional nephrologists.
Kidney Int.2004; 66(4):
1622–32.
43.
BeathardG.A., UrbanesA., LitchfieldT., WeinsteinA.The risk of sedation/analgesia in hemodialysis patients
undergoing interventional procedures. Semin
Dial2011; 24: 97.
44.
BeathardG.A., UrbanesA., LitchfieldT.Radiation dose associated with dialysis vascular access
interventional procedures in the interventional nephrology
facility. Semin Dial2013; 26: 503.
45.
HeyeS., MaleuxG., OyenR.H.Occupational radiation dose: percutaneous interventional
procedures on hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and
grafts. Radiology2012; 264: 278.
46.
VanoE., SanchezR., FernandezJ.M.Patient dose reference levels for interventional radiology: a
national approach. Cardiovasc Intervent
Radiol2009; 32: 19.
47.
DobsonA., El-GamilA.M., ShimerM.T.Clinical and economic value of performing dialysis vascular
access procedures in a freestanding office-based center as compared with the
hospital outpatient department among Medicare ESRD
beneficiaries. Semin Dial2013; 26: 624.
48.
BresciaM.J., CiminoJ.E., AppelK., HurwichB.J.Chronic hemodialysis using venipuncture and a surgically created
arteriovenous fistula. N Engl J Med.1966; 275:
1089–1092.
49.
BharatA., JaenickeM., ShenoyS.A novel technique of vascular anastomosis to prevent
juxta-anastomotic stenosis following arteriovenous fistula
creation. J Vasc Surg.2012; 55:
274–280.
50.
SilvaM.B., HobsonR.W., PappasP.J., PadbergF.T.Vein transposition in the forearm for autogenous hemodialysis
access. J Vasc Surg.1997; 26:
981–988.
51.
KDOQI clinical practice
guidelines and clinical practice recommendations for vascular access
2006.Am J Kidney Dis2006; 48(Suppl 1):
S176–S322.
52.
LynchJ.R., WasseH., ArmisteadN.C., McClellanW.M.Achieving the goal of the Fistula First Breakthrough Initiative
for prevalent maintenance hemodialysis patients. Am
J Kidney Dis2011; 57:
78–89.
53.
PetersonW.J., BarkerJ., AllonM.Disparities in fistula maturation persist despite pre-operative
vascular mapping. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol2008; 3:
437–41.
54.
LokC.E., AllonM., MoistL.M., OliverM.J., ShahH., ZimmermanD.REDUCE FTM I (Risk equation determining unsuccessful cannulation
events and failure to maturation in arteriovenous fistulas).
J Am Soc Nephrol2006; 17:
3204–12.
55.
SinghP., RobbinM.L., LockhartM.E., AllonM.Clinically immature arteriovenous hemodialysis fistulas: effect
of US on salvage. Radiology2008; 246:
299–305.
56.
AsifA., Roy-ChaudhuryP., BeathardG.A.Early arteriovenous fistula failure: A logical proposal for when
and how to intervene. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol2006; 1:
332–339.
57.
LeeT., UllahA., AllonM., SuccopP., El-KhatibM., MundaR.Decreased cumulative access survival in arteriovenous fistulas
requiring interventions to promote maturation. Clin
J Am Soc Nephrol2011; 6:
575–81.
58.
AllonM., LokC.E.Dialysis fistula or graft: The role for randomized clinical
trials. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol2010; 5:
2348–54.
59.
TrerotolaS.O.Accessory Veins: The Crisis Upon Us. J
Vasc Access2013; 14: S38.
60.
Debate: Con: Transcatheter
Embolotherapy of Collaterals in Immature AVFs.J Vasc Access2007; 8:
138–139.
61.
TrerotolaS.O.Fiction: There's no proof that accessory veins cause
immaturity. J Vasc Access2010; 11:
218–219.
BeathardG.A., SettleS.M., ShieldsM.W.Salvage of the nonfunctioning arteriovenous
fistula. Am J Kidney Dis1999; 33:
910–916.
64.
FaiyazR., AbreoK., ZamanF., PervezA., ZibariG., WorkJ.Salvage of poorly developed arteriovenous fistulae with
percutaneous ligation of accessory veins. Am J
Kidney Dis2002; 39:
824–827.
65.
BeathardG.A., ArnoldP., JacksonJ., LitchfieldT.Aggressive treatment of early fistula failure.
Kidney Int2003; 64:
1487–1494.
66.
Turmel-RodriguesL., MoutonA., BirmeleB.Salvage of immature forearm fistulas for haemodialysis by
interventional radiology. Nephrol Dial
Transplant2001; 16:
2365–2371.
67.
ShinS.W., DoY.S., ChooS.W., LieuW.C., ChooI.W.Salvage of immature arteriovenous fistulas with percutaneous
transluminal angioplasty. Cardiovasc Intervent
Radiol2005; 28:
434–438.
68.
ClarkT.W., CohenR.A., KwakA.Salvage of nonmaturing native fistulas by using
angioplasty. Radiology2007; 242:
286–292.
69.
NasserG., NguyenB., RheeE., AchkarK.Endovascular treatment of the “failing to mature” arteriovenous
fistula. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol2006; 1:
275–280.
70.
BeathardG.A., LitchfieldT.Effectiveness and safety of dialysis vascular access procedures
performed by interventional nephrologists. Kidney
Int.2004; 66(4):
1622–32.
71.
Schon. Comparison of
Procedure Cost for Thrombectomy of Arteriovenous Fistulas and
Grafts. Seminars in Dialysis2013; 26:
344–348.
72.
Clark. Outcome and
Prognostic Factors of Restenosis after Percutaneous Treatment of Native
Hemodialysis Fistulas. J Vasc Interv Radiol2002; 13:
51–59.
73.
Chih-ChengWu. Radial artery
approach for endovascular salvage of occluded autogenous radial-cephalic
fistulae. Nephrol Dial Transplant2009; 24:
2497–2502.
NassarG.Endovascular Management of the ‘Failing to Mature’ Arteriovenous
Fistula. Tech Vasc Interventional Rad2008; 11:
175–180.
80.
National Kidney Foundation: KDOQI
Clinical Practice Guidelines and Clinic Practice Recommendations for 2006
updates: hemodialysis adequacy, peritoneal dialysis adequacy and vascular
access.Am J Kidney Dis2006; 48:
S1–S322.
81.
ClarkT.W.I., HirschD.A., JindalK.J., VeugelersP.J., LeBlancJ.Outcome and prognostic factors of restenosis following
percutaneous treatment of native hemodialysis fistulae.
J Vasc Interv Radiol2002; 13:
51–59.
82.
RajanD.K., ClarkT.W., SimonsM.E., KachuraJ.R., SnidermanK.Procedural success and patency after percutaneous treatment of
thrombosed autogenous arteriovenous dialysis fistulas.
J Vasc Interv Radiol2002; 13:
1211–1218.
83.
HingoraniA., AscherE., KallakuriS., GreenbergS., KhanimovY.Impact of reintervention for failing upper extremity
arteriovenous autogenous access for hemodialysis. J
Vasc Surg2001; 34:
1004–1009.
84.
ShatskyJ.B., BernsJ.S., ClarkT.W.I., KwakA.Single-center Experience with the Arrow-Trerotola percutaneous
thrombectomy device in the management of thrombosed native dialysis
fistulas. J Vasc Interv Radiol.2005; 16(12):
1605–1611.
85.
TordoirJ.H.M., BodeA.S.,
PeppelenboschN., van der SandeF.M., de HaanM.W.Surgical or endovascular repair of thrombosed dialysis vascular
access: Is there any evidence?J Vasc Surg2009; 50:
953–956.
86.
DoughertyM.J., CalligaroK.D., SchindlerN., RaviolaC.A., NtosoA.Endovascular versus surgical treatment for thrombosed
hemodialysis grafts: A prospective, randomized study.
J Vasc Surg1999; 30:
1016–1023.
87.
LokC.E., SontropJ.M., TomlinsonT.Cumulative Patency of Contemporary Fistulas versus Grafts
(2000-2010). Clin J Am Soc Nephrol2013; 8:
810–818.
88.
MillerG.A., HwangW., PreddieD., KharitonA., SavranskyY.Percutaneous Salvage of Thrombosed Immature Arteriovenous
Fistulas. Seminars in Dialysis2011; 24:
107–114.
89.
OkadaS., ShenoyS.Arteriovenous access for hemodialysis: pre-operative assessment
and planning. J Vasc Access.2014; 15 Suppl 7:
S1–5.
90.
JainG., MayaI.D., AllonM.Outcomes of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy of arteriovenous
fistula in hemodialysis patients. Semin
Dial.2008; 21:
581–583.
91.
OakesD., SherckJ.P., CobbL.F.Surgical salvage of failed radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulae:
techniques and results in 29 patients. Kidney
Int1998; 53:
480–487.
92.
PonikvarR.Surgical Salvage of thrombosed native arteriovenous fistulas for
hemodialysis by Interventional Nephrologists. Ther
Apher Dial2009; 13:
340–344.
93.
ChanM.R., YoungH.N., YevzlinA.S.The effect of in-stent restenosis on hemodialysis access
patency. Hemodial Int.2009; 13:
250–256.
94.
MayaI.D., SaddekniS., AllonM.Treatment of refractory central vein stenosis in hemodialysis
patients with stents. Semin Dial.2007; 20:
78–82.
95.
HaskalZ.J., TrerotolaS., DolmatchB.Stent graft versus balloon angioplasty for failing
dialysis-access grafts. N Engl J Med.2010; 362:
494–503.
96.
HaskalJ.Twelve month results of the RENOVA trial: a prospective
multicenter randomized, concurrently-controlled comparison of the Flair
endovascular stent graft vs. balloon angioplasty in dialysis access
grafts. J Vasc Interv Radiol.2013; 24: S5.
ShemeshD., GoldinI., ZaghalI.Angioplasty with stent graft versus bare stent for recurrent
cephalic arch stenosis in autogenous arteriovenous access for hemodialysis:
a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Vasc
Surg.2008; 48:
1524–1531.
FontaineR., KimM., KienyR.Surgical treatment of peripheral circulation disorders. [Die
chirugische Behandlung der peripheren Durchblutungsstörungen]. [Article in
German]. Helvetica Chirurgica Acta1954; 21(5/6):
499–533.
101.
RutherfordR.B., BakerJ.D., ErnstC.Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity
ischemia: revised version. J Vasc Surg1997; 26: 517.
102.
NorgrenL., HiattW.R., DormandyJ.A., TASC II Working Group.
Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral
Arterial Disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg.2007; 45(Suppl S):
S5–67.
103.
KothariS., TrerotolaS.O.Central venous stenosis is more often symptomatic in hemodialysis
patients with grafts compared to fistulae (abstract).
J Vasc Interv Radiol.2014; 25:
S181–182.
104.
SurrattR.S., PicusD., HicksM.E., KleinhofferM., JendrisiakM.The importance of pre-operative evaluation of the subclavian vein
in dialysis access planning. AJR Am J
Roentgenol.1991; 156(3):
623–625.
105.
RajanD.K.,
ChennepragadaS.M., LokC.E.Patency of endovascular treatment for central venous stenosis: Is
there a difference between dialysis fistulas and grafts?J Vasc Interv Radiol.2007; 18:
353–359.
106.
LevitR.D., CohenR.M., KwakA.Asymptomatic central venous stenosis in hemodialysis
patients. Radiology.2007; 238:
1051–1056.
107.
RenaudC.J., FrancoisM., NonyA., Fodil-CherifM.,
Turmel-RodriguesL.Comparative outcomes of treated symptomatic versus non-treated
asymptomatic high-grade central vein stenoses in the outflow of
predominantly dialysis fistulas. Nephrol Dial
Transplant.2012; 27:
1631–1638.
108.
YanY., SudheendraD., DagliM.Effect of central venous angioplasty on hemodialysis access
circuit flow (abstract). J Vasc Interv
Radiol.2014; 25:
S19–20.
109.
TrerotolaS.O.Central Venous Stenosis: Best avoided; if found, best ignored; if
treated, best ballooned; if stented, best covered?J Vasc Access.2011; 12:
S41–43.
110.
LinY., YangC., ChuC.The role of postintervention pullback pressure gradient in
percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for central vein stenosis in
hemodialysis patients. Cardiovasc Intervent
Radiol.2013; 36:
1296–1305.
111.
MuennigP.A., GliedS.A.What changes in survival rates tell us about US health
care. Health Affairs.2010; 29(11):
2105–2113.
112.
CMS Office of the Actuary.National Health Expenditure Projections
2010-2020.
113.
VincentG.K., VelkoffV.A.The Next Four Decades: The Older Population in the United States: 2010
to 2050. Census Bureau, May, 2010.
DobsonA., El-GamilA.M., ShimerM.T., DaVanzoJ.E., UrbanesA.Q., BeathardG.A., LitchfieldT.F.Clinical and economic value of performing dialysis vascular
access procedures in a freestanding office-based center as compared with the
hospital outpatient department among Medicare ESRD
beneficiaries. Semin Dial.2013; 26:
624–632.
117.
BeathardG.A., LitchfieldT.; Physician Operators
Forum of RMS Lifeline, Inc. Effectiveness safety of dialysis vascular access
procedures performed by interventional nephrologists.
Kidney Int.2004; 66:
1622–1632.
KutscherB.Out of their comfort zone. Dialysis provider DaVita needs to
integrate big physician practice to move toward integrated
care. Mod Healthc.2013; 43(37): 6,
12-4, 1.
120.
GhaffariA.,
Kalantar-ZadehK., LeeJ., MadduxF., MoranJ., NissensonA.PD First: Peritoneal dialysis as the default transition to
dialysis therapy. Semin Dial2013; 26:
706–713.
121.
SaxenaR.Peritoneal dialysis: misperceptions and reality.
Am J Med Sci.2014; 348:
250–261.
122.
LokC.E., DavidsonI.Optimal choice of dialysis access for chronic kidney disease
patients: developing a life plan for dialysis access.
Semin Nephrol.2012; 32:
530–537.
123.
DavidsonI., GallichioM., RossJ.Who decides between peritoneal and hemo-dialysis? Surgeons should
make most of these decisions. J Vasc Access2014; 15(Suppl 8):
S38.
ZorzanelloM., FlemingW., ProwantB.Use of tissue plasminogen activator in peritoneal dialysis
catheters: a literature review and one center's experience.
Nephrol Nurs J.2004; 31:
534–537.
131.
LokC.E., DavidsonI.Optimal Choice of Dialysis Access for Chronic Kidney Disease
Patients: Developing a Life Plan for Dialysis Access.
Semin Nephrol.2012; 32:
530–537.
132.
SinghN., DavidsonI., MinhajuddinA.Risk factors associated with peritoneal dialysis catheter
survival: a 9-year single-center study in 315 patients.
J Vasc Access.2010; 11(4):
316–322.
133.
RossJ., DolmatchB., GallichioM.Training and Certification in Dialysis Access.
J Vasc Access2014; 15(Suppl 8):
S3–S7. www.TacidaGroup.com
134.
GhaffariA.,
Kalantar-ZadehK., LeeJ.PD First: peritoneal dialysis as the default transition to
dialysis therapy. Semin Dial.2013; 26(6):
706–13.
135.
BlakeP.G., QuinnR.R., OliverM.J.Peritoneal dialysis and the process of modality
selection. Perit Dial Int.2013; 33(3):
233–41.
136.
WuI.W., WangS.Y., HsuK.H.Multidisciplinary predialysis education decreases the incidence
of dialysis and reduces mortality–a controlled cohort study based on the
NKF/DOQI guidelines. Nephrol Dial
Transplant2009; 24(11):
3426–33.
137.
LiebmanS.E., BushinskyD.A., DolanJ.G., VeazieP.Differences between dialysis modality selection and
initiation. Am J Kidney Dis2012; 59(4):
550–7.
138.
WuerthD.B., FinkelsteinS.H., SchwetzO.Patients' descriptions of specific factors leading to modality
selection of chronic peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis.
Perit Dial Int2002; 22(2):
184–90.
139.
AsifA., PfledererT.A., VieiraC.F.Does catheter insertion by nephrologists improve peritoneal
dialysis utilization? A multicenter analysis. Semin
Dial2005; 18(2):
157–60.
140.
MehrotroR., MarshD., VoneshE., PetersV., NissensonA.Patient education and access of ESRD patients to renal
replacement therapies beyond in-center hemodialysis.
Kidney Int.2005; 68:
378–390.
141.
Federal Register Vol.
73, No. 73, Tuesday April 15,
2008: Rules and Regulations S494.70, S494.100.
142.
MendelssohnD.Coping with the CKD epidemic: the promise of multidisciplinary
team-based care. Nephrol Dial Transplant.2005; 20:
10–12.
FademS., WalkerD., AbbottG.Satisfaction with renal replacement therapy and education: the
American Association of Kidney Patients Survey. Clin
J Am Soc Nephrol2011; 6:
605–612.