There is little information regarding the clinical performance of hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) in older patients. Eighty-seven patients (99 hips) aged 65 years or older received HRA while a control group of 52 patients (64 hips) received a primary THA. The average age was 69.2 years for the HRA group and 71.9 years for the THA group. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 13 years. UCLA walking, function and activity scores and SF-12 scores were higher in the HRA group. At 10 years, the Kaplan-Meier overall survivorship rates were 96.7% for the HRA group and 91.2% for the THA group (p = 0.3174). We suggest considering hip resurfacing for patients 65 or older in centres where there is expertise in performing this procedure.
AmstutzH.C., BallS.T., Le DuffM.J., DoreyF.J.Resurfacing THA for patients younger than 50 year. Results of 2- to 9-year followup.Clin Orthop Relat Res.2007; 460: 159–64.
2.
DanielJ., PynsentP.B., McMinnD.J.Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis.J Bone Joint Surg Br.2004; 86: 177–84.
3.
HartyJ.A., DevittB., HartyL.C., MolloyM., McGuinnessA.Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry analysis of peri-prosthetic stress shielding in the Birmingham resurfacing hip replacement.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg.2005; 125: 693–5.
4.
SmoldersJ.M., HolA., RijndersT., Van SusanteJ.L.Changes in bone mineral density in the proximal femur after hip resurfacing and uncemented total hip replacement: a prospective randomised controlled study.J Bone Joint Surg Br.2010; 92: 1509–14.
5.
HäkkinenA., BorgH., HakulinenM.Bone mineral density of the proximal femur after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: 1-year follow-up study.BMC Musculoskelet Disord.2011; 12: 100.
6.
KishidaY., SuganoN., NishiiT., MikiH., YamaguchiK., YoshikawaH.Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip.J Bone Joint Surg Br.2004; 86: 185–9.
7.
CordingleyR., KohanL., Ben-NissanB.What happens to femoral neck bone mineral density after hip resurfacing surgery?J Bone Joint Surg Br.2010; 92: 1648–53.
8.
EswaramoorthyV.K., BiantL.C., FieldR.E.Clinical and radiological outcome of stemmed hip replacement after revision from metal-on-metal resurfacing.J Bone Joint Surg Br.2009; 91: 1454–8.
9.
SandifordN.A., Muirhead-AllwoodS.K., SkinnerJ.A.Revision of failed hip resurfacing to total hip arthroplasty rapidly relieves pain and improves function in the early post operative period.J Orthop Surg Res.2010; 5: 88.
10.
WeraG.D., GillespieR.J., PettyC., PetersilgeW.J., KraayM.J., GoldbergV.M.Revision of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ).2010; 39: e78–83.
11.
BallS.T., Le DuffM.J., AmstutzH.C.Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2007; 89: 735–41.
NunleyR.M., Della ValleC.J., BarrackR.L.Is patient selection important for hip resurfacing?Clin Orthop Relat Res.2008; 467: 56–65.
17.
McGrathM.S., DesserD.R., UlrichS.D., SeylerT.M., MarkerD.R., MontM.A.Total hip resurfacing in patients who are sixty years of age or older.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2008; 90(Suppl 3): 27–31.
18.
CarrothersA.D., GilbertR.E., RichardsonJ.B.Birmingham hip resurfacing in patients who are seventy years of age or older.Hip Int.2011; 21: 217–24.
AmstutzH.C., Le DuffM.J.Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus.J Arthroplasty.2008; 23(Suppl 1): 36–43.
21.
AmstutzH.C., ThomasB.J., JinnahR., KimW., GroganT., YaleC.Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Am.1984; 66: 228–41.
22.
WareJ.Jr., KosinskiM., KellerS.D.A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity.Med Care.1996; 34: 220–33.
23.
BrookerA F., BowermanJ.W., RobinsonR.A., RileyL.H.Jr.. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification.J Bone Joint Surg Am.1973; 55: 1629–32.
24.
GruenT.A., McNeiceG.M., AmstutzH.C.“Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.Clin Orthop Relat Res.1979; 141: 17–27.
25.
AmstutzH.C., BeauléP.C., DoreyF.J., Le DuffM.J., CampbellP.A., GruenT.A.Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six year follow-up study.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2004; 86: 28–39.
26.
DeleeJ.G., CharnleyJ.Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement.Clin Orthop Relat Res.1976; 121: 20–32.
27.
GruenT.A., Le DuffM.J., WiskL.E., AmstutzH.C.Prevalence and clinical relevance of radiographic signs of impingement in metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2011; 93: 1519–26.
28.
BiedermannR., ToninA., KrismerM., RachbauerF., EiblG., StöcklB.Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component.J Bone Joint Surg Br.2005; 87: 762–9.
29.
LangtonD.J., SprowsonA P., MahadevaD., BhatnagarS., HollandJ.P., NargolA.V.Cup anteversion in hip resurfacing: validation of EBRA and the presentation of a simple clinical grading system.J Arthroplasty.2010; 25: 607–13.
30.
Le DuffM.J., AmstutzH.C.The relationship of sporting activity and implant survivorship after hip resurfacing.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2012; 94: 911–8.
31.
AmstutzH.C., CampbellP.A., Le DuffM.J.Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2004; 86: 1874–7.
32.
AmstutzH.C., Le DuffM.J., CampbellP.A., DoreyF.J.The effects of technique changes on aseptic loosening of the femoral component in hip resurfacing. Results of 600 Conserve Plus with a 3 to 9 year follow-up.J Arthroplasty.2007; 22: 481–9.
33.
MontM.A., SeylerT.M., UlrichS.D.Effect of changing indications and techniques on total hip resurfacing.Clin Orthop Relat Res.2007; 465: 63–70.
34.
WareJ.E., KosinskiM., KellerS.D.SF-12: how to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales.3rd ed.Lincoln RI: Quality Metric Inc., 1998.
35.
MancusoC.O., SalvatiE.A., JohansonN.A., PetersonM.G., CharlsonM.E.Patients' expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty.1997; 12: 387–96.
36.
Le DuffM.J., AmstutzH.C.Sporting activity after hip resurfacing: changes over time.Orthop Clin North Am.2011; 42: 161–7, vii-viii.
37.
SteffenR.T., FoguetP.R., KriklerS.J., GundleR., BeardD.J., MurrayD.W.Femoral neck fractures after hip resurfacing.J Arthroplasty.2009; 24: 614–19.
