ArchdeaconM.T., CannadaL.K., HerscoviciD.Jr., OstrumR.F., AnglenJ.O.. Prevention of complications after treatment of proximal femoral fractures.Instr Course Lect2009; 58: 13–9.
3.
MillerD.L., GoswamiT.. A review of locking compression plate biomechanics and their advantages as internal fixators in fracture healingClin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)2007; 22: 1049–62.
4.
AhmadM., NandaA.S., BajwaA.S., Candal-CoutoJ., GreenS., HuiA.C.. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: When does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?Injury2007; 38: 358–64.
5.
FulkersonE., EgolK.A., KubiakE.N., LiporaceF., KummerF.J., KovalK.J.. Fixation of diaphyseal fractures with a segmental defect: a biomechanical comparison of locked and conventional plating techniques.J Trauma2006; 60: 830–5.
6.
AlobaidA., HarveyE.J., ElderG.M., LanderP., GuyP., ReindlR.. Minimally invasive dynamic hip screw: prospective randomized trial of two techniques of insertion of a standard dynamic fixation device.J Orthop Trauma2004; 18: 207–12.
7.
EhlingerM., AdamP., SimonP., BonnometF.. Technical difficulties in hardware removal intitanium compression plates with locking screws.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2009; 95: 373–6.
