We describe a clinical case of a tunneled central venous catheter left in situ because of the presence of tenacious adhesions to the vein where it was housed.
HassanA., KhalifaM., Al-AkraaM., LordR., DavenportA.Six cases of retained central venous haemodialysis access catheters.Nephrol Dial Transplant.2006; 21(7): 2005–8.
5.
TheinH., RatanjeeS.K.Tethered hemodialysis catheter with retained portions in central vein and right atrium on attempted removal.Am J Kidney Dis.2005; 46(3): e35–9.
6.
VellankiV.S., WatsonD., RajanD.K., BholaC.B., LokC.E.The stuck catheter: a hazardous twist to the meaning of permanent catheters.J Vasc Access.2015; 16(4): 289–93.
7.
WilsonG.J.P., van NoeselM.M., HopW.C.J., van de VenC.The catheter is stuck: complications experienced during removal of a totally implantable venous access device. A single center study in 200 children.J Pediatr Surg.2006; 41(10): 1694–8.
8.
AkgunS., AkK., TugrularS., CivelekA., IsbirC., ArsanS.Median sternotomy for an unexpected complication of permanent hemodialysis catheters: “stuck catheter”.Vasa.2008; 37(3): 293–6.
9.
FornerisG., SavioD., QuarettiP.. Dealing with stuck hemodialysis catheter: state of the art and tips for the nephrologist.J Nephrol.2014; 27(6): 619–25.
10.
HongJ.H.A breakthrough technique for the removal of a hemodialysis catheter stuck in the central vein: endoluminal balloon dilatation of the stuck catheter.J Vasc Access.2011; 12(4): 381–4.
11.
QuarettiP., GalliF., FiorinaI.A refinement of Hong's technique for the removal of stuck dialysis catheters: an easy solution to a complex problem.J Vasc Access.2014; 15(3): 183–8.
12.
LodiM., EbrahimiR.F., PezzottiP., CarbonariL.The removal of a stuck catheter: an alternative to Hong's technique.J Vasc Access.2016; 17(6): 548–51.
13.
TeepleE.A., ShielsW.E., NwomehB.C., RocourtD.V., CanianoD.A.Difficult central venous access removal: case reports of the use of endovascular snare shearing of endothelialized tetherings.J Pediatr Surg.2011; 46(5): e13–5.
14.
PisoniR.L., ZepelL., PortF.K., RobinsonB.M.Trends in US Vascular Access Use, Patients Preferences, and Related Practices: an Update from the US DOPPS Practice Monitor with International Comparisons.AJKD.2015; 65(6): 905–15.
15.
BeathardG.A., UrbanesA.Infection associated with tunneled hemodialysis catheters.Semin Dial.2008; 21(6): 528–38.
16.
ForauerA.R., TheoharisC.Histological changes in the human vein wall adjacent to indwelling central venous catheters.J Vasc Intervent Radiol.2003; 14(9 Pt 1): 1163–8.
JonesS.A., GiacomantonioM.A complication associated with central line removal in the pediatric population: retained fixed catheter fragments.J Pediatr Surg.2003; 38(4): 594–6.
19.
JeanG., VanelT., ChazotC., CharraB., TerratJ.C., HurotJ.M.Prevalence of stenosis and thrombosis of central veins in haemodialysis after a tunnelled jugular catheter.Nephrologie.2001; 22(8): 501–4.
20.
MossA.H., VasilakisC., HolleyJ.L., FoulksC.J., PillaiK., McDowellD.E.Use of a silicone dual-lumen catheter with a Dacron cuff as a long-term vascular access for hemodialysis patients.Am J Kidney Dis.1990; 16(3): 211–5.
21.
LittleM.A., O'RiordanA., LuceyB.. A prospective study of complications associated with cuffed, tunnelled haemodialysis catheters.Nephrol Dial Transplant.2001; 16(11): 2194–200.
22.
KingdonE.J., HoltS.G., DavarJ.. Atrial thrombus and central venous dialysis catheters.Am J Kidney Dis.2001; 38(3): 631–9.
23.
HungAM, IkizlerTA. Hemodialysis central venous catheters as a source of inflammation and its implications.Semin Dial2008; 21: 401–4.
24.
DhingraR.K., YoungE.W., Hulbert-ShearonT.E., LeaveyS.F., PortF.K.Type of vascular access and mortality in U.S. in hemodialysis patients.Kidney Int.2001; 60(4): 1443–5.
25.
OcakG., HalbesmaN., Le CessieS.. Haemodialysis catheters increase mortality as compared to arteriovenous accesses especially in elderly patients.Nephrol Dial Transplant.2011; 26(8): 2611–7.
26.
MovilliE., BrunoriG., CameriniC.. The kind of vascular access influences the baseline inflammatory status and epoetin response in chronic hemodialysis patients.Blood Purif.2006; 24(4): 387–93.
