Accurate measurement of central corneal thickness (CCT) is essential in refractive surgery and advanced glaucoma diagnostics. The gold standard for pachymetry is full-contact ultrasound-based pachymetry. As this method is associated with potential sources of error, noncontact methods have been introduced. The aim of this study was to compare CCT results measured using 4 different techniques.
Methods
In this analysis of 20 patients (40 eyes) at the University Eye Hospital Heidelberg, Germany, we compared a slit-lamp-mounted optical coherence tomography (OCT) system (SL-OCT, Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany), conventional ultrasound pachymetry (IOPac, Heidelberg Engineering), optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR, Haag-Streit, Germany), and scanning-slit pachymetry (Orbscan).
Results
Comparison among the 4 groups did not show significant differences, except the comparison of OLCR to Orbscan; the mean was significantly different (p=0.0247) and the Orbscan detected slightly thicker values than the other methods.
Conclusions
Orbscan, SL-OCT, and OLCR provide non-touch technology, without the need for local anesthesia, and limiting the risk of infection or artifacts. Extreme care must be used interpreting the results obtained from Orbscan, as this technique may overestimate the CCT significantly.
MedeirosF.A., SampleP.A., WeinrebR.N.Corneal thickness measurements and frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities in ocular hypertensive eyes. Ophthalmology2003; 110: 1903–8.
2.
BechmannM., ThielM.J., RoesenB.Central corneal thickness determined with optical coherence tomography in various types of glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol2000; 84: 1233–7.
3.
MedeirosF.A., SampleP.A., ZangwillL.M.Corneal thickness as a risk factor for visual field loss in patients with preperimetric glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Am J Ophthalmol2003; 136: 805–13.
4.
HerndonL.W., WeizerJ.S., StinnettS.S.Central corneal thickness as a risk factor for advanced glaucoma damage. Arch Ophthalmol2004; 122: 17–21.
5.
FlynnT.H., OhbayashiM., DawsonM.Use of ultrasonic pachymetry for measurement of changes in corneal thickness in mouse corneal transplant rejection. Br J Ophthalmol2010; 94: 368–71.
6.
MigliorS., AlbeE., GuareschiM.Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of ultrasonic pachymetry measurements of central corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol2004; 88: 174–7.
7.
KawanaK., MiyataK., TokunagaT.Central corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II scanning slit topography, noncontact specular microscopy, and ultrasonic pachymetry in eyes with keratoconus. Cornea2005; 24: 967–71.
WongA.C., WongC.C., YuenN.S., HuiS.P.Correlational study of central corneal thickness measurements on Hong Kong Chinese using optical coherence tomography, Orbscan and ultrasound pachymetry. Eye2002; 16: 715–21.
14.
MuscatS., McKayN., ParksS., KempE., KeatingD.Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal thickness measurements by optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2002; 43: 1791–5.
15.
FishmanG.R., PonsM.E., SeedorJ.A., LiebmannJ.M., RitchR.Assessment of central corneal thickness using optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg2005; 31: 707–11.
16.
BöhnkeM., ChavanneP., GianottiR., SalatheR.P.Continuous non-contact corneal pachymetry with a high speed reflectometer. J Refract Surg1998; 14: 140–6.
17.
GenthU., MrochenM., WaltiR., SalaheldineM.M., SeilerT.Optical low coherence reflectometry for noncontact measurements of flap thickness during laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology2002; 109: 973–8.
18.
AuffarthG.U., WangL., VolckerH.E.Keratoconus evaluation using the Orbscan topography system. J Cataract Refract Surg2000; 26: 222–8.
19.
BlandJ.M., AltmanD.G.Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet1986; 1: 307–10.
20.
WirbelauerC., ScholzC., HoeraufH.Noncontact corneal pachymetry with slit lamp-adapted optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol2002; 133: 444–50.
21.
RainerG., PetternelV., FindlO.Comparison of ultrasound pachymetry and partial coherence interferometry in the measurement of central corneal thickness. J Cataract Refract Surg2002; 28: 2142–5.
22.
MédisL.Jr., LangenbucherA., SeitzB.Scanning-slit and specular microscopic pachymetry in comparison with ultrasonic determination of corneal thickness. Cornea2001; 20: 711–4.
23.
ChakrabartiH.S., CraigJ.P., BrahmaA., MalikT.Y., McGheeC.N.Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound and Orbscan slit-scanning topography in normal and post-LASIK eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg2001; 27: 1823–8.
24.
MarsichM.W., BullimoreM.A.The repeatability of corneal thickness measures. Cornea2000; 19: 792–5.
25.
JavaloyJ., VidalM.T., VilladaJ.R., ArtolaA., AlioJ.L.Comparison of four corneal pachymetry technique; s in corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg2004; 20: 29–34.
26.
AsensioI., RahhalS.M., AlonsoL., Palanca-SanfranciscoJ.M., Sanchis-GimenoJ.A.Corneal thickness values before and after oxybuprocaine 0.4% eye drops. Cornea2003; 22: 527–32.
27.
HerseP., SiuA.Short-term effects of proparacaine on human corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol1992; 70: 740–4.
28.
EhlersN.The precorneal film: biomicroscopical, histological and chemical investigations. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl1965; Suppl 81: 81–134.
29.
MishimaS.Some physiological aspects of the precorneal tear film. Arch Ophthalmol1965; 73: 233–41.
30.
WangJ., FonnD., SimpsonT.L., JonesL.Precorneal and pre-and postlens tear film thickness measured indirectly with optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2003; 44: 2524–8.
31.
King-SmithP.E., FinkB.A., FogtN.The thickness of the human precorneal tear film: evidence from reflection spectra. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2000; 41: 3348–59.
32.
PallikarisI.G., KymionisG.D., GinisH.S., KounisG.A., TsilimbarisM.K.Ocular rigidity in living human eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2005; 46: 409–14.
