In this article I consider issues of knowledge, reflexivity and representation in
feminist research. Using my feminist sociological doctoral research as an
example I add to debate by feminist researchers and others concerned with
epistemological authority. After setting the research scene and outlining what I
feel I did and did not achieve both substantively and epistemologically I
consider some of the contradictions and tensions in feminist research through a
consideration of reflexivity and representation. Throughout I consider issues of
auto/biography.
ABBOTTP.,
and WALLACEC.
(1997) Introducing Sociology: feminist
perspectivesLondon:
Routledge.
2.
ACKERJ.,
BARRYK., and
ESSEVERDJ
(1991 originally 1995) ‘Objectivity and Truth:
problems in doing feminist research’ in
FonowM. M.,
CookJ. A.
(editors) Beyond Methodology: feminist scholarship as lived
experienceBloomington: Indiana
University.
3.
ALDRIDGEJ.
(1993) ‘The Textual Disembodiment of Knowledge
in Research Account Writing’Sociology vol. 27 No 1 pp
53–66.
4.
ANNANDALEE.,
& CLARKJ
(1996) ‘What is gender? Feminist theory and the
sociology of human reproduction’Sociology of Health and Illness vol. 18 No
1 pp 17–44.
5.
ATTARD.
(1987) ‘The Controversial
Feminist’ in
ChesterG.,
NeilsonS.
(editors) In Other Words: writing as a feministLondon:
Hutchinson.
CONNELLR.W.
(1987) Gender and power: society and the person and
sexual politicsCambridge:
Polity.
8.
COTTERILLP,
and LETHERBYG
(1993) ‘Weaving Stories: personal
auto/biographies in feminist research’Sociology Vol 27 No 14 pp
227–37.
9.
DI
STEPHANOC.
(1990) ‘Dilemmas of Difference: feminism,
modernity and postmodernism’ in
NicholsonL.
J. (editor) Feminism/PostmodernismLondon:
Routledge.
10.
EXLEYC., and
LETHERBYG.
(2001) ‘Managing a Disrupted Lifecourse: issues
of identity and emotion work’Health vol. 5 No 1 pp
112–132.
11.
FINEM.
(1994) ‘Dis-tance and Other Stances:
negotiations of power inside feminist research’ in
GitlinA.
(editor) Power and Method: political activism and educational
researchLondon:
Routledge.
12.
FONOWM. M.,
and COOKJ.
(1991) (editors) Beyond Methodology: Feminist
Scholarship as Lived ExperienceLondon:
Routledge.
13.
FRANKLINS.
(1997) Embodied Progress: a cultural account of
assisted conceptionLondon:
Routledge.
14.
FRANKLINS.
(1992) ‘Making Sense of Missed Conceptions:
anthropological perspectives on unexplained infertility’ in
StaceyM.
(editor) Changing Human Reproduction: social science
perspectivesLondon:
Sage.
15.
GIDDENSA.
(1984) New Rules of Sociological MethodLondon:
Macmillan.
16.
GILLESPIER.
(2000) ‘When No Means No: disbelief, disregard
and deviance as discourses of voluntary childlessness’Women's Studies International Forum vol. 23 No
2 pp 223–34.
17.
GLUKSMANNM.
(1994) ‘The Work of Knowledge and the Knowledge
of Women's Work’MaynardM.,
PurvisJ.
(editors) Researching Women's Lives from a Feminist PerspectiveLondon: Taylor and
Francis.
18.
GOULDNERA.
(1970) The Coming Crisis of Western SociologyLondon:
Heinemann.
19.
GRIELA.
(1997) ‘Infertility and Psychological Distress:
a critical review of the literature’Social Science and Medicine vol. 45 No
11 pp
1679–1704.
20.
HARAWAYS.
(editor) (1988) ‘Situated Knowledges: the science
question in feminism and the privilege of the practical
perspectiveFeminist Studies vol. 14 No 3
pp 573–599.
21.
HARDINGS.
(editor) (1987) Feminism and MethodologyMilton Keynes: Open
University.
22.
HARDINGS.
(1993) ‘Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology:
“what is strong objectivity?”’ in
AlcoffL.,
PorterE.
(editors) Feminist EpistemologiesLondon:
Routledge.
23.
HEYV.
(1989) ‘A Feminist Exploration’
in HeyV.,
ItzinC.,
SaundersL.,
SpeakmanM. A.
(editors) Hidden Loss: miscarriage and ectopic pregnancyLondon: The Women's
Press.
24.
JONESS.J.
(1997) ‘Reflexivity and Feminist Practice:
ethical dilemmas in negotiating meaning’Feminism and Psychology vol. 7 No
3 pp 348–351.
25.
KELLYL.,
BURTONS., and
REGANL.
(1994) ‘Researching women's lives or studying
women's oppression? Reflections on what constitutes feminist
research’ in
MaynardM.,
PurvisJ.
(editors) Researching Women's Lives from a Feminist PerspectiveLondon: Taylor and
Francis.
26.
LETHERBYG.
(1994) ‘Mother or Not, Mother or What?: problems
of definition and identity’Women's Studies International Forum vol. 15,
No 5 pp 525–532.
27.
LETHERBYG
(1997) “Infertility’ and ‘Involuntary Childlessness’:
definition and self-identity’ (unpublished PhD thesis:
Staffordshire University).
28.
LETHERBYG
(1999) ‘Other than Mother and Mothers as Others:
the experience of motherhood and non-motherhood in relation to ‘infertility’
and ‘involuntary childlessness”Women's Studies International Forum vol. 22 No
3 pp 359–372.
29.
LETHERBYG.
(2000) ‘Dangerous Liaisons: auto/biography in
research and research writing’ in
Lee-TreweekG.,
and LinkogleS.
(editors) Danger in the Field: risk and ethics in social
researchLondon:
Routledge.
30.
LETHERBYG.
(2000a) ‘Working and Wishing: an auto/biography
of managing home and work’Auto/Biography Vol VIII Nos 1 &
2 pp 89–98.
31.
LETHERBYG.
(2002) ‘Childless and Bereft?: stereotypes and
realities in relation to ‘voluntary’ and ‘involuntary childlessness’ and
‘womanhood’Sociological Inquiry72.
32.
LETHERBYG.
(forthcoming) ‘Challenging Dominant Discourses: identity and
change of the experience of ‘infertility’ and ‘involuntary
childlessness’Journal of Gender Studies
33.
LETHERBYG.,
and RAMSAYK.
(1999) ‘So Why are You Doing This Project?:
issues of friendship, research and autobiography’Auto/Biography Vol VII Nos 1 and
2 pp 35–42.
34.
LETHERBYG.,
and ZDRODOWSKID.
(1995) ‘“Dear Researcher”: the use of
correspondence as a method with feminist qualitative
research’Gender and Society vol. 9 No 5
pp 576–93.
35.
MAYNARDM.
(1994) ‘Methods, Practice and Epistemology: the
debate about feminism and research’ in
MaynardM.,
PurvisJ.
(editors) Researching Women's Lives for a Feminist PerspectiveLondon: Taylor and
Francis
36.
MAYNARDM.,
and PURVISJ.
(1994) (editors) Researching Women's Lives for a
Feminist PerspectiveLondon: Taylor and
Francis.
37.
MCMAHONM.
(1998) ‘Between Exile and Home’
in AbbeyS., and
O'ReillyA.
(editors) Redefining Motherhood: changing identities and
patternsToronto: Second
Story.
38.
MCROBBIEA.
(1982) ‘The Politics of Feminist Research:
between talk, text and action’Feminist Review vol. 12 pp
46–57.
39.
MEERABEAUL.
(1989) Parents in Waiting: the experience of subfertile
couples (unpublished PhD thesis: University of
London)
40.
MILLEND.
(1997) ‘Some methodological and epistemological
epistemological issues raised by doing feminist research on non- feminist
women’Sociological Research Online vol. 2 No
3 <http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/3/3.html>
41.
MONACHJ.H.
(1993) Childless no Choice: the experience of
involuntary childlessnessLondon:
Routledge.
42.
MORLEYL.
(1997) ‘Interrogating Patriarchy: the challenges
of feminist research’ in
MorleyL.,
WalshV.
(editors) Breaking Boundaries: women in higher educationLondon: Taylor and
Francis.
43.
MYKHALOVSKIYE.
(1996) ‘Reconsidering table talk: critical
thoughts on the relationship between sociology, autobiography and
self-indulgence’Qualitative Sociology vol. 19 No
1 pp 131–51.
44.
NEEDLEMANS.K.
(1987) ‘Infertility and In Vitro Fertilisation:
the social workers’ role’Health and Social Work vol. 12 No
2 pp 135–143.
45.
OAKLEYA.
(1998) ‘Gender, methodology and people's ways of
knowing: some problems with feminism and the paradigm debate in social
science’Sociology vol. 32 No 4 pp
707–732.
46.
OKELYJ.
(1992) ‘Anthropology and autobiography:
participatory experience and embodied knowledge’ in
OkelyJ.,
CallawayH.
(editors) Anthropology and AutobiographyLondon:
Routledge.
47.
PFEFFERN,
and WOOLLETTA
(1983) The Experience of InfertilityLondon:
Virago.
48.
RAMAZANOGLUC.
(1989) ‘Improving on sociology: the problems of
taking a feminist standpoint’Sociology Vol 13 No 3 pp
429–42
49.
REINHARZS.
(1992) Feminist Methods in Social ResearchNew York and Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
50.
RIBBENSJ.
(1989) ‘Interviewing: an unnatural
situation’Women's Studies International Forum Vol 12 No
6 pp 579–92.
51.
RIBBENSJ.
(1993) ‘Facts or Fiction?: aspects of the use of
autobiographical writing in undergraduate sociology’Sociology vol. 27 No 1 pp
323–342.
52.
RIBBENSJ.,
and EDWARDSR.
(1998) Feminist Dilemmas in Qualitative Research:
public knowledge and private livesLondon:
Sage.
53.
SANDELOWSKIM
(1990) ‘Failure of Volition: female agency and
infertility in historical perspective’Signs vol. 15 No 3 pp
474–499.
54.
SCOTTS.
(1998) ‘Here be Dragons; researching the
unbelievable, learning the unthinkable. A feminist sociologist in
unchartered territory’Sociological Research Online vol. 3 no
3 <http://www.socresonline.org.uk/3/3/3.html>
55.
SKEGGSB.
(1994) ‘Situating the production of feminist
ethnography’ in
MaynardM.,
PurvisJ.
(editors) Researching Women's Lives for a Feminist PerspectiveLondon: Taylor and
Francis.
56.
STANLEYL.
(editor) (1990) Feminist Praxis: research, theory and
epistemology in feminist sociologyLondon:
Routledge.
57.
STANLEYL.
(1991) ‘Feminist Auto/biography and Feminist
Epistemology’ in
AaronJ.,
WalbyS.
(editors) Out of the Margins: Women's Studies in the NinetiesLondon:
Routledge.
58.
STANLEYL.
(1993) ‘Auto/biography in
sociology’Sociology vol. 27 no 1 pp
41–42.
59.
STANLEYL
(1996) ‘The Mother of Invention: necessity,
writing and representation’ in
WilkinsonS.,
KitzingerC.
(editors) Representing the Other: a feminism and psychology
readerLondon:
Sage.
STANLEYL
(1999) ‘Children of Our Time: politics, ethics and
feminist research processes’ Web-based article.
62.
STANLEYL.,
and WISES.
(1993) Breaking Out Again: feminist ontology and
epistemologyLondon:
Routledge.
63.
TEMPLEB.
(1997) ‘“Collegial Accountability” and Bias: the
solution or the problem?Sociological Research Online vol. 2 No
4 <http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/4/8.html>
64.
WILKINSONS.,
and KITZINGERC.
(editors) (1996) Representing the Other: a feminism and
psychology readerLondon:
Sage.
65.
WOLFD.L.
(1996) Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork Boulder,
Colorado: The Free
Press.
