Previous findings of large absolute mobility to service I class (the “upper” part
of the “salariat”) can be seen as a sign of the implausibility of class
cultures. However, it is argued that these findings might be due to
inappropriate divisions of class. Using Swedish data, and following a Weberian
definition of class, a social class schema is derived empirically from marriage
tendencies. Social homogeneity (immobility and in-marriage) is found to be
relatively large in the working classes and in certain subgroups of service I.
One interpretation of this, and the fact that there are few inter- marriages and
a low level of mobility between the working class and these subgroups of service
I, is that class structure might be bipolar such that the extremes are upholders
of certain norms and cultures. The possible upper classes of service I need to
be better operationalised in future research. Thus, since class cultures are
plausible, and since individualistic rational action theory appears to be
insufficient for explaining all possible class differentials (as earlier
research has indicated), future class analysis might better rely on both
rational action theory and class cultural explanations.
AXELSSONC.1992. Hemmafrun som försvann: Övergången till lönearbete
bland gifta kvinnor i Sverige 1968-1981. Institutets för social
forskning avhandlingsserie 21. Stockholm:
Institute for Social
Research.
2.
BIHAGENE.1999. ‘How Do Classes Make Use of their
Incomes?’ Social Indicators Research,
47(2)
119–151.
3.
BIHAGENE.,
and KATZ-GERROB.2000. ‘Culture Consumption in
Sweden’.Poetics, 27327–349.
4.
BIHAGENE.,
and HALLERODB.2000. ‘The Crucial Aspects of
Class’.Work, Employment & Society,
14(2)
307–330.
5.
BOURDIEUP.1984. Distinction: A Social Critique on the Judgement of
Taste.Cambridge: Harvard University
Press.
6.
BREENR., and
GOLDTHORPEJ.
H.1997. ‘Explaining educational differentials: Towards
a formal rational action theory’.Rationality & Society, 9(3)
275–306.
7.
BREENR., and
ROTTMAND. B.1995. Class Stratification: A comparative
Perspective.Hemel Hempstead: Harvester
Wheatsheaf.
8.
CIGÉHNG.1999. ‘Klassidentitet vid seklets
slut’. Sociologisk Forskning
(1): 121–139.
9.
CLARKTerry
N., &
LIPSETSeymour
M.1991. ‘Are Social Classes Dying?’
International Sociology.6(4),
397–410.
10.
CROMPTONR.1993. Class and stratification: an introduction to current
debates.Cambridge: Polity
Press.
11.
DEVINEF.1997. ‘Towards a classless society?’
In: JonesH. (ed).
Towards a classless society? Pp
201–224.
London:
Routledge.
12.
DEVINEF.1998. ‘Class Analysis and the Stability of Class
Relations’.Sociology, 32(1)
23–42.
13.
ERICKSONB.H.1996. ‘Culture, Class, and
Connections’.American Journal of Sociology,
102(1)
217–251.
14.
ERIKSONR.1984. ‘Social Class of Men, Women and
Families’.Sociology, 18(4)
501–514.
15.
ERIKSONR.,
and GOLDTHORPEJ.H.1992a. The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in
Industrial Societies.Oxford: Clarendon
Press.
16.
ERIKSONR.,
and GOLDTHORPEJ.H.1992b. ‘The CASMIN project and the American
dream’.European Sociological Review,
8(3)
283–305.
17.
ERIKSONR.,
and GOLDTHORPEJ.H.1992c. ‘Individual or Family? Results from two
approaches to class assignment’.Acta Sociologica, 35(2)
95–105.
18.
ERIKSONR.,
and JONSSONJ. (eds)
1996. Can Education Be Equalized? The Swedish Case in
Comparative Perspective.Oxford: Westview
Press.
19.
ESPING-ANDERSENG.1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism.New Jersey: Princeton University
Press.
20.
EVANSG.1992. ‘Testing the validity of the Goldthorpe class
schema’.European Sociological Review,
8(3).
211–232.
21.
EVANSG.1993. ‘Class, Prospects and the
Life-cycle’.Acta Sociologica, 36(3)
263–276.
22.
FEATHERMAND.L.,
SPENNERK.I.,
& TSUNEMATSUN1988. ‘Class and the socialization of
children’. In:
HetheringtonM.E.,
LernerR.M.,
& PerlmutterM.
(eds) Child Development in Life-Span Perspective. Pp
67–90.
Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, Inc.
23.
FRANKFORT-NACHMIASC.,
and NACHMIASD.1996. Research Methods in the Social Sciences (5th
ed.).London:
Arnold.
24.
GIDDENSA1981. The Class structure of the Advanced
Societies (2nd ed.).
London:
Hutchinson.
25.
GOLDTHORPEJ.H.1987. Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern
Britain (2nd ed.).
Oxford: Clarendon
Press.
26.
GOLDTHORPEJ.H.1995. ‘The Service class revisited’.
In: Butler, and
Savage (eds) Social Change and the
Middle Classes. Pp 313–329.
London: UCL
Press.
27.
GOLDTHORPEJ.H.1996. ‘Class Analysis and the Reorientation of Class
Theory: The Case of Persisting Differentials in Educational
Attainment’.British Journal of Sociology,
47(3),
481–505.
28.
GRUSKYD. B.,
and SORENSENJ. B.1998. ‘Can Class Analysis be
Salvaged?’ American Journal of Sociology,
103(5)
1187–1234.
29.
HANSENM.N.1995. Class and Inequality in Norway.Oslo: Institute for Social
Research.
30.
HATCHERR.1998. ‘Class Differentiation in Education: Rational
Choices?’ British Journal of Sociology of
Education, 19(1)
5–20.
31.
HOUTM.1983. Mobility Tables.Series: Quantitative Applications
in the Social Sciences. Newbury Park:
SAGE.
32.
HÄLLL., and
VOGELJ.1997. Välfärd och ojämlikhet i 20-års perspektiv
1975-1995.Stockholm: Statistics
Sweden.
33.
JONSSONJ.,
and ERIKSONR.1997. ‘Klasstruktur och social rörlighet i Sverige
under 1900-talet’. In:
HällL., and
VogelJ.
(eds). Välfärd och ojämlikhet i 20-årsperspektiv 1975-1995. Pp
491–512.
Stockholm: Statistics
Sweden.
34.
LAMONTM.1992. Money, Morals, and Manners.Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.
35.
LE
GRANDC.1994. ‘Löneskillnaderna i Sverige’.
In: FritzellJ., and
LundbergO.
(eds.) Vardagens villkor.Stockholm: Brombergs
Bokförlag.
36.
LEIULFSRUDH.1991. Det familjära klassamhället.Lund:
Arkiv.
37.
LOCKWOODD.1989. The Blackcoated Worker (2nd
ed.). London: Allen
& Unwin Ltd.
38.
MARSHALLG.,
RoseD.,
NewbyH.,
& VoglerC.1988. Social Class in Modern Britain.London:
Routledge.
39.
MARSHALLG,
SWIFTA., and
ROBERTSS.1997. Against the Odds: Social Class and Social Justice in
Industrial Countries.Oxford: Clarendon
Press.
40.
MERTONR.K.1941. ‘Intermarriage and the social
structure’.Psychiatry, 4,
361–374.
41.
MERTONR.K.1968. Social Theory and Social Structure
(5th ed.). New York:
The Free Press.
42.
MÜLLERW.1996. ‘Class inequalities in educational
outcomes’ in Erikson, and
Jonsson (eds) Can Education be
Equalized?Oxford: Westview
Press.
43.
NISBETR.A.1959. ‘The decline and fall of social
class’.Pacific Sociological review,
2(1):
11–28.
44.
OSKARSSONM.1994. Klassröstning i Sverige.Nerenius & Santerus Förlag
AB.
45.
PAKULSKIJ.,
and WATERSM.1996. The Death of Class.London:
Sage.
46.
PAYNEG.1987. Mobility and Change in Modern Society.London: The Mac Millan Press
LTD.
47.
PRANDYK.1998. ‘Class and Continuity in Social Reproduction:
an Empirical Investigation’.The Sociological Review46(2)
340–364.
48.
SAVAGEM.,
BARLOWJ.,
DICKENSP.,
and FIELDINGT.1992. Property, Bureaucracy and Culture.London:
Routlege.
49.
SCOTTJ.1996a. ‘Comment on Goldthorpe’.British Journal of Sociology47(3)
507–512.
50.
SCOTT,
J.1996b. Stratification and Power; Structures of Class,
Status and Command.Cambridge: Polity
Press.
51.
SØRENSENA.1991. ‘On the Usefulness of Class Analysis in
Research on Social Mobility and Socioeconomic Inequality’.Acta Sociologica.34(2),
71–87.
52.
STATISTICS SWEDEN,1995Yrkesklassificeringar i FoB 85 enligt Nordisk yrkesklassificering (NYK)
och Socioekonomisk indelning (SEI),
Stockholm: Statistics
Sweden.
53.
SVALLFORSS.1995. ‘The End of Class Politics? - Structural
Cleavages and Attitudes to Swedish Welfare Policies’.Acta Sociologica, 38,
53–74.
54.
THALINM.1993. ‘Class Inequality and Post-industrial
Employment in Sweden’. In:
Esping-AndersenG.
(ed.) Changing Classes. Pp
80–108. London:
Sage.
55.
UUNKW.1996. Who Marries Whom: The role of Social origin,
Education and high culture in Mate selection of industrial societies during
the twentieth century?Nijmegen University,
Dissertation.
56.
WEBERM.1968. Economy and Society - An Outline of Interpretative
Sociology
(RothG.,
WittichC.
(ed)), volume 2, New York:
Bedminster Press.
57.
WESTERGAARDJohn1995. Who Gets What: The Hardening of Class Inequality in
the Late Twentieth Century.Cambridge:
Polity.
