BellottiE. (2014). Qualitative Networks: Mixed Methods in Sociological Research.Routledge.
2.
BrandesU., FreemanL.C. & WagnerD. (2013). Social networks. In TamassiaR. (Ed.), Handbook of Graph Drawing and Visualization, CRC Press, p. 803–837.
3.
BrandesU., KenisP. & RaabJ. (2006). Explanation through network visualization. Methodology, 2(1): p 16–23. [doi:10.1027/1614-2241.2.1.16]
4.
CrossleyN. (2010). The social world of the network, Sociologica, 1, doi: 10.2383/32049.
5.
DominguezS. & HollsteinB. (Eds.). (2014). Mixed-Methods Social Network Research, New York: Cambridge University Press. [doi:10.1017/CBO9781139227193]
6.
EdwardsG. (2010). Mixed-Methods Approaches to Social Network Analysis.National Centre for Research Methods. Working paper 015. URL: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/842/.
HealyK. & MoodyJ.W. (2014). Data visualisation in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 40: p. 105–128. [doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145551]
9.
HeathS., FullerA. & JohnstonB. (2009). Chasing shadows: defining network boundaries in qualitative social network analysis. Qualitative Research, 9 (5): p. 645–661. [doi:10.1177/1468794109343631]
10.
HoganB., CarrascoJ.A. & WellmanB. (2007). Visualizing personal networks: working with participant-aided sociograms. Field Methods, 19: p. 116–144. [doi:10.1177/1525822X06298589]
11.
KrempelL. (2011). Network visualization. In ScottJ. & CarringtonP.J. (Eds.). The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis, London: Sage, p. 558–577. [doi:10.4135/9781446294413.n37]
12.
MorenoJ.L. (1953 [first edition 1934]). Who Shall Survive?Beacon, N.Y.: Beacon House Inc.
13.
RobinsG. (2015). Doing Social Networks Research: Network-based Research Design for Social Scientists, London: Sage.
14.
RyanL., MulhollandJ. & AgostonA. (2014). Talking ties: Reflecting on network visualisation and qualitative interviewing. Sociological Research Online, 19 (2) 16 http://www.socresonline.org.uk/19/2/16.html10.5153/sro.3404 [doi:10.5153/sro.3404]
15.
TubaroP., CasilliA.A. & MounierL. (2014). Eliciting personal network data in web surveys through participant-generated sociograms. Field Methods, 26 (2): p. 107–125.