In this paper we make a methodological case for mixed method social network analysis (MMSNA). We begin by both challenging the idea, prevalent in some quarters, that mixing methods means combining incompatible epistemological or theoretical assumptions and by positing an ontological argument in favour of mixed methods. We then suggest a methodological framework for MMSNA and argue for the importance of ‘mechanisms’ in relational-sociological research. Finally, we discuss two examples of MMSNA from our own research, using them to illustrate arguments from the paper.
BachelardG. (2002) The Formation of the Scientific Spirit, Bolton, Clinamen.
5.
BarnesJ (1954) Class and Committees in a Norwegian Island Parish, Human Relations (7), p. 39–58 [doi:10.1177/001872675400700102]
6.
BarnesJ. (1969) Networks and Political Process. In MitchellJ. C. (ed.) (1969) Social Networks in Urban Situations, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
7.
BearmanP. (1993) Relations into Rhetorics, Rutgers University Press.
8.
BellottiE. (2014) Qualitative Networks: Mixing Methods in Social Research, London, Routledge.
BhaskerR. (1979) The Possibility of Naturalism, London, Routledge.
11.
BlumerH. (1956) Sociological Analysis and the Variable, American Sociological Review21, p. 683–90. [doi:10.2307/2088418]
12.
BorgattiS, EverettM, and FreemanL, (2002) Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis, Harvard, MA, Analytic Technologies.
13.
BorgattiS.P., EverettM.G. and JohnsonJ. (2013) Analysing Social Networks, London, Sage.
14.
BourdieuP. (1984) Distinction, London, Routledge.
15.
BourdieuP, ChamboredonJ-C and PasseronJ-C (1991) The Craft of Sociology, Berlin, de Gruyter.
16.
BurtR. (1987). Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 92, p. 1287–1335. [doi:10.1086/228667]
17.
CanguilhemG. (1994) A Vital Rationalist, New York, Zone.
18.
ColemanJ. S., KatzE., & MenzelH. (1966). Medical innovation: A diffusion study. New York, NY: Bobbs-Merill Co.
19.
ColemanJ. (1988) Free Riders and Zealots: the Role of Social Networks, Sociological Theory6(1), p. 52–7. [doi:10.2307/201913]
20.
ColemanJ. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory, Harvard, Belknap.
21.
CrossleyN. (2015) Networks of Sound, Style and Subversion: the Punk and Post-Punk Worlds of Manchester, London, Liverpool and Sheffield, 1975-1980, Manchester, Manchester University Press.
22.
CrossleyN. (2011) Towards Relational Sociology, London, Routledge.
23.
CrossleyN. (2010) The Social World of the Network: qualitative aspects of network analysis, Sociologica2010 (1), http://www.sociologica.mulino.it/main.
24.
CrossleyN. (2007) Social Networks and Extra-Parliamentary Politics, Sociology Compass1(1), 222–236. [doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00003.x]
25.
CrossleyN, BellottiE, EdwardsG, EverettM, KoskinenJ, and TranmerM. (2015) Social Network Analysis for Ego-Nets, London, Sage.
26.
CrossleyN, and KrinskyJ. (eds) (2015) Social Networks and Social Movements, London, Routledge. [doi:10.1177/0038038511425560]
27.
CrossleyN. and IbrahimJ. (2012) Critical Mass, Social Networks and Collective Action: the Case of Student Political Worlds, Sociology46(4), 596-612
28.
CrossleyN, McAndrewS, and WiddopP. (2015) Social Networks and Music Worlds, London, Routledge. [doi:10.1093/0199251789.001.0001]
29.
DianiM. and McAdamD.(eds) (2003) Social Movements and Networks, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
30.
EdwardsG. (2010) Mixed Methods Approaches to Social Network Analysis, National Centre for Research Methods (UK) Review Paper. [doi:10.1080/14742837.2013.834251]
31.
EdwardsG. (2014) Infectious Innovations? The Diffusion of Innovation in Social Movement Networks, the Case of Suffragette Militancy, Social Movement Studies13(1), p. 48–69. [doi:10.1177/205979910900400104]
32.
EdwardsG., & CrossleyN. (2009). Measures and meanings: Exploring the ego-net of Helen Kirkpatrick Watts, militant Suffragette. Methodological Innovations Online, 4, p. 37–61. [doi:10.1086/230450]
33.
EmirbayerM. and GoodwinJ. (1994) Network Analysis, Culture and the Problem of Agency, American Journal of Sociology99, p. 1411–54. [doi:10.1086/227352]
34.
FeldS. (1981) The Focused Organization of Social Ties, American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), p. 1015–1035. [doi:10.1017/CBO9780511761638]
35.
GivanR. K., SouleS. A., & RobertsK. M. (Eds.). (2010). The diffusion of social movements, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. [doi:10.1163/ej.9789004165694.i-450.48]
36.
GorskiP. (2009) Social “Mechanisms” and Comparative Historical Sociology: A Critical Realist proposal, in Hedstrom, P. and Wittrock, B. (2009)Frontiers of Sociology, Leiden, Brill, p. 147–97. [doi:10.1086/225469]
37.
GranovetterM. (1978). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, p. 1360–1380. [doi:10.1177/000312240907400302]
38.
GrossN. (2009) A Pragmatist Theory of Social Mechanisms, American Sociological Review74(3), p. 358–79. [doi:10.1086/303109]
39.
HedstromP. (2000). Meso-level networks and the diffusion of social movements: The case of the Swedish social democratic party. American Journal of Sociology, 106, p. 145–172. [doi:10.1017/CBO9780511488801]
40.
HedströMP. (2005) Dissecting the Social, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [doi:10.1177/1525822X06298589]
41.
HoganB., CarrascoJ.A., WellmanB. (2007). Visualizing personal networks: working with participant-aided sociograms. Field Methods, 19: p. 116–144.
42.
HollsteinB. and DominguezS. (eds.) (2014), Mixing Methods in Social Network Research, Cambridge University Press.
43.
IbrahimJ. and CrossleyN. (forthcoming) Network Formation in Student Political Worlds, in BrooksR. (forthcoming) Student Politics and Protest: International Perspectives, London, Routledge.
44.
KapfererB (1969) Norms and manipulation of relationships in a work context, in MitchellJ. C., (ed.) (1969), Social Networks in Urban Situations, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
45.
KeatR. and UrryJ. (1975) Social Theory as Science, London, Routledge. [doi:10.1057/9780230627628]
46.
KirkeD. (2006) Teenagers and Substance Abuse, London, Palgrave. [doi:10.1080/03085140500465899]
47.
KnoxH., SavageM. and HarveyP. (2006) Social networks and the study of relations: networks as method, metaphor and form, Economy and Society, 35(1), p. 113–140.
48.
LazarsfeldP. and MertonR. (1964) Friendship as Social Process, in BergerM, AbelT, and PageC. (1964) Freedom and Control in Modern Society, New York, Octagon Books, p. 18–66.
49.
LusherD, KoskinenJ. and RobinsG. (2013) Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [doi:10.1017/CBO9780511805431]
50.
McadamD., TarrowS. and TillyC. (2001) Dynamics of Contention.New York: Cambridge University Press.
51.
McadamD. and TarrowS. (2011) ‘Introduction: Dynamics of Contention 10 years on’, Mobilization, 16(1): p. 1–10. [doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415]
52.
McphersonM, Smith-LovinL and CookJ. (2001) Birds of Feather: Homophily in Social Networks, Annual Review of Sociology27, p. 415–44.
53.
Merleau-PontyM. (1962) The Phenomenology of Perception, London, Routledge.
54.
Merleau-PontyM. (1965) The Structure of Behaviour, London, Methuen. [doi:10.1093/0199251789.003.0011]
55.
MischeA. (2003) Cross-Talk in Movements, in DianiM. and McAdamD. (eds.) Social Movements and Networks, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
56.
MitchellJ.C. (1969) Social Networks in Urban Situations, Manchester, Manchester University Press.
57.
MoodyJ.W., HealyK. (2014), Data Visualisation in Sociology. Annual Review of SociologyVol. 40 (August)
58.
OliverP. and MarwellG. (1993) The Critical Mass in Collective Action, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
59.
OliverP., & MyersD. (1998). Diffusion models of cycles of protest as a theory of social movements. Paper prepared for presentation at the session on “Describing, analyzing and theorizing social movements” of Research committee 48, Social movements, collective action, and social change, at the Congress of the International Sociological Association, Montreal, July 30, 1998. [doi:10.1086/230190]
60.
PadgettJ and AnsellC (1993) Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400-1434, The American Journal of Sociology, 98 (6), p. 1259–1319. [doi:10.4324/9780203393338]
61.
PawsonR. (1989) A Measure for Measures, London, Routledge. [doi:10.5153/sro.3404]
62.
RyanL., MulhollandJ., AgostonA. (2014). Talking ties: Reflecting on network visualisation and qualitative interviewing. Sociological Research Online, 19(2): 16
63.
SampsonS. (1969) Crisis in a Cloister, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
64.
SchutzA. (1972) The Phenomenology of the Social World, Evanston, Northwestern University Press.
65.
ScottJ. (2000) Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, London, Sage.
66.
SnijdersT. A. B. (2010) Actor-Based Models for Network Dynamics. Working paper [doi:10.1111/0081-1750.00099]
67.
SnijdersT. A. B. (2001) The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics, pp. 361–395 in SobelM. E., BeckerM.P., (eds.) Sociological Methodology.Blackwell, London. [doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004]
68.
SnijdersT. A. B., van de BuntG.G., and SteglichC.E.G. (2010) Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics.Social Networks32(1), p. 44–60. [doi:10.1093/sf/75.3.855]
69.
SouleS. (1997). The student divestment movement in the United States and tactical diffusion: The Shantytown Protest. Social Forces, 75, p. 855–883. [doi:10.1177/0049124191019003003]
70.
StrangD. (1991). Adding social structure to diffusion models: An Event history framework. Sociological Methods Research, 19, p. 324–353. [doi:10.1177/1525822X13491861]
71.
TubaroP., CasilliA.A., MounierL. (2014). Eliciting personal network data in web surveys through participant-generated sociograms. Field Methods, 26 (2): p. 107–125.
72.
ValenteT. (1995) Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations, New Jersey, Hampton.
73.
WassermanS and FaustK. (1994) Social Network Analysis, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
