The Changers are seven British men who have experienced upward mobility in their lives. A vast body of quantitative insights into upward mobility exist. Yet the qualitative, experiential dimensions of upward mobility are understudied; especially in relation to the lives of upwardly mobile males. This article presents an empirically rigours corrective that qualitatively outlines the Changers’ upwardly mobile existences and views. In particular, this article examines how sections of the mass-media have produced a didactic notion of ‘middleclass’ masculinity which the Changers feel compelled to replicate in their everyday lives, largely via the men consuming specific, expensive commodities. Attention is drawn to the anxieties which the Changers endure because of their social mobility and associated attempts to qualitatively appear ‘middleclass’.
BanksM. (2001) Visual Methods in Social Research. London, Sage.
2.
BaumanZ. (2001) The Individualised Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
3.
BeasleyC. (2012) ‘Problematising contemporary Men/Masculinities theorising’, British Journal of Sociology63 (4): p. 747–765.
4.
BellC. (1968) Middleclass Families: Social and Geographical Mobility.London: Routledge. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203001462]
5.
BertauxD and ThompsonP. (Eds) (1997) Pathway to Social Class. A Qualitative Approach to Social Mobility.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
6.
BottE. (1957) Family and Social Network. London: Tavistock.
7.
BourdieuP. (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. London: Routledge.
8.
BreenR. (2004) Social Mobility in Europe.Oxford University Press. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199258457.001.0001]
9.
CromptonR. (2006) ‘Class and Family’, The Sociological Review, 54 (4): p. 658–677. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00665.x]
10.
CrossleyN. (2001) The social body: habit, identity and desire, London: Sage.
11.
EliasN and ScotsonJ. (1994) The established and the outsiders: a sociological enquiry into community problems.London: Sage.
12.
FriedmanS. (2013) ‘The Price of the Ticket: Rethinking the Experience of Social Mobility’, Sociology0 (0): 1–7.
13.
GiddensA. (1991) Modernity and Self Identity: Self and society in the late modern age, Oxford: Polity Press.
14.
GlassD. (1954) Social Mobility in Britain. London: Routledge.
15.
GoldthorpeJ, LlewellynC, and PayneC. (1980) Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
16.
HallS. (1973) “ENCODING/ DECODING” in: Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies. London: Hutchinson: p. 128–138.
17.
HopperE. (1981) Social Mobility: A Study of Social Control and Insatiability. New York: Praeger.
18.
IngramN. (2011) ‘Within school and beyond the gate: the complexities of being educationally successful and working class’, Sociology45 (2): p. 287–302. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038510394017]
19.
KimmelM. (2005) ‘Globalization and its Mal (e) contents: The Gendered Moral and Political Economy of Terrorism’ in: KimmelM (Ed) Handbook of Studies on Men & Masculinities, Sage: p. 414–431. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452233833.n24]
20.
LawlerS. (1999) ‘Getting out and getting away: women's narratives of class mobility’, Feminist Review, 63: p. 3–24. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1080/014177899339036]
21.
LenskiG. (1954) ‘Status Crystallization: a Non-vertical Dimension of Social Status’, American Sociological Review19 (4). [doi://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2087459]
22.
MarcuseH. (1964) One-dimensional man: studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. London: Routledge.
23.
MilesA, SavageM and BuhlmannF. (2011) ‘Telling a modest story: accounts of men's upward mobility from the National Child Development Study’, The British Journal of Sociology62 (4): p. 418–441. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2011.01372.x]
24.
MorganD. (2005) “Class and Masculinity” in KimmelM (Ed) Handbook of Studies on Men and Masculinities, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications: p. 165–77. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452233833.n10]
25.
NayakA. (2003) ‘’Ivory Lives’: Economic Restructuring and the Making of Whiteness in a Post-industrial Youth Community”, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 6 (3): p. 305–325. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13675494030063003]
26.
NayakA. (2006) ‘Displaced masculinities: chavs, youth and class in the post-industrial city’, Sociology, 40 (5): p. 813–831.
27.
PayneG. (2012) ‘A New Social Mobility? The political redefinition of a sociological problem’, Contemporary Social Science7 (1): p. 55–71. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2011.652360]
28.
PayneG and AbbottP. (1990) (Eds). The Social Mobility of Women. Beyond Male Mobility Models.The Falmer Press.
29.
ReayD, CrozierG and ClaytonJ. (2009) ‘Strangers in Paradise: Working class students in elite universities’, Sociology43 (6): p. 1103–1121. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038509345700]
30.
SavageK; DevineF; CunninghamN; TaylorM; Johs; HjellbrekkeL; Le RouxB; FriedmanS and MilesA. (2013) ‘A New Model of Social Class? Finding's from the BBC's Great British Class Survey Experiment’, Sociology47 (2): p. 1–32. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038513481128]
31.
SennettR and CobbJ. (1973) The Hidden Injuries of Class.Vintage Books.
32.
StraussA. (1971) The contexts of social mobility: Ideology and theory. Aldine.
33.
TaylorY. (2011) Fitting into place? Class and Gender Geographies and Temporalities. Ashgate.
34.
VeblenT. (1899) The Theory of the Leisure Class. Penguin.
