This paper argues for a critical reclaiming of family and highlights the risks associated with decentring such a powerful and pervasive concept. Influential critiques of family as an organising category are considered in the context of a contemporary trend towards reorienting it within broader studies foregrounding personal and intimate realms of human connectedness. It is suggested that while concepts of personal lives and intimacy have much to offer they can not capture the full range and nature of relations raised through the lens of family. In particular the political consequences of subsuming family within wider approaches are set out through reference to a new public politics of family in which emphasis is placed less on structure and function, and more on knowledge and competence. Through an exploration of the key changes characterising this shift a case is made for retaining family (alongside intimacy and personal life) as a flexible, enduring and necessary sociological framework.
BERNARDESJ. (1999) We must not define ‘the family’ in (eds) SettlesB.K., SteinmetzS. K., PetersonG. W., and SussmanM.B.Concepts and definitions of family for the 21st century, Haworth Press.
4.
BECKU., and Beck-GernsheimE. (1995). The Normal Chaos of Love, Cambridge: Polity Press.
5.
BECKU., and Beck-GernsheimE. (2002). Individualization, London: Sage.
6.
BECK-GERNSHEIME. (1998) ‘On the way to a post-familiar family: from a community of need to elective affinities’, Theory, Culture and Society, vol 15, no 3-4, pp 53–70. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276498015003004]
7.
BECKU, in conversation with WillmsJ. (2004). Conversations with Ulrich Beck, Cambridge: Polity.
8.
BUDGEONS., and RoseneilS. (2004). Editors’ Introduction: Beyond the Conventional Family.Current Sociology vol. 52 no. 2 pp 127–134[doi://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0011392104041797]
9.
BURMANE. (2009) Beyond emotional literacy in feminist and educational research, BritishEducational Research Journal, Vol. 35 no 1 pp 137–135. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01411920802041848]
GIDDENSA. (1991). Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge: Polity Press.
23.
GIDDENSA. (1992). The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies, Cambridge: Polity Press.
24.
GIDDENSA. (1998) The Third Way.Cambridge: Polity Press.
25.
GILBERTR., Spatz WidomC., BrowneK., FergussonD., WebbE., and Janson (2008) Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries, The Lancet, vol 373 no 9657 pp 68–81. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61706-7]
26.
GILDINGM. (2010) ‘Reflexivity over and above convention: the new orthodoxy in the sociology of personal life, formerly sociology of the family’, British Journal of Sociology, vol, no614: pp. 757–777.
27.
GILLIESV. (1997). A World of Their Own Making, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
GILLIESV. (2005a) ‘Meeting parents’ needs? Discourses of “support” and “inclusion” in family policy’, Critical Social Policy, Vol. 25 no. 1 pp 70–90. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261018305048968]
29.
GILLIESV. (2005b) Raising the meritocracy: parenting and the individualisation of social class, Sociology, vol.39 no.5 pp 835–853.
30.
GILLIESV. (2006) Working Class Mothers and School Life: Exploring the Role of Emotional Capital, Gender and Education vol. 18 no. 3, pp 81–295. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540250600667876]
31.
GILLIESV. (2007). Marginalised Mothers: Exploring Working Class Experiences of Parenting, Abingdon: Routledge.
32.
GILLIESV. (2008) Childrearing, class and the new politics of parenting, Sociology Compass, 2/3, pp 1079–1095.
33.
GILLIESV. (2011) Social and emotional pedagogies: critiquing the new orthodoxy of emotion in classroom behaviour management, British Journal of Sociology of Education. Vol 32, no. 2, 185–202. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2011.547305]
34.
GILLISJ. (1996) A World of Their Own Making: Myth, Ritual, and the Quest for Family Values, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
GOLDSONB., and JamiesonJ. (2002) ‘Youth crime, the ‘parenting deficit’ and state intervention: a contextual critique’, Youth Justice, vol 2, no 2, pp 82–99. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1177/147322540200200203]
36.
GUBRIUMJ. F., and HolsteinJ. A. (1990). What is Family, California: Mayfield.
37.
HARDYMENTC. (2007) Dream Babies: Childcare advice from John Locke to Gina Ford, Frances Lincoln Publishers
HOLTA (2009) (En)gendering responsibilities: experiences of parenting a ‘young offender;The Howard Journal, vol 48, no 4 pp 344–356.
40.
ILLOUZE (2008). Saving the Modern Soul: Therapy, Emotions and the Culture of Self-help, Berkeley: California Press.
41.
JAMESA., and CurtisP. (2010) Family displays and personal lives, Sociology, vol 44, no 6, pp 1163–1180. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038510381612]
42.
JAMIESONL. (1998). Intimacy: Personal Relationships in Modern Societies, Cambridge: Polity
43.
JAMIESONL., MorganD., CrowG., and AllanG. (2006) Friends, Neighbours and Distant Partners: Extending or Decentring Family Relationships?Sociological Research Online, vol 11, no 3. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.5153/sro.1421]
44.
LAREAUA (2003) Unequal childhoods, class, race and family life.Berkeley: University of California Press.
45.
LAWLERS. (2000) Mothering the Self: Mothers, Daughters, Subjects, London: Routledge.
46.
LAYARDR., and DunnJ. (2009). A Good Childhood: Searching for Values in a Competitive Age, London: Children's Society.
47.
LINDC., and KeatingH. (2008). Children, Family Relationships and the State, Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
48.
MCCARTHYJ. (forthcoming) The powerful relational language of ‘family’: togetherness, belonging, and personhood, Sociological Review.
49.
MORGAND. (1996). Family Connections, An Introduction to Family Studies, Cambridge: Polity.
50.
MORGAND. (2011). Rethinking Family Practices, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
51.
MOSKOWITZE. (2001) In Therapy We Trust: America's Obsession with Self-Fulfilment, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
52.
MUNCIEJ. (2009). Youth and Crime, London: Sage
53.
PAHLR. (2000). On Friendship, Cambridge: Polity Press
54.
PARKERI. (1992) Discourse Dynamics. Critical Analysis for Social and Individual Psychology.London: Routledge.
55.
PARKERR., and Pattenden (2009) Strengthening and repairing relationships: Addressing forgiveness and sacrifice in couples education and counselling Austrailian Family Relationships Clearinghouse Briefing 13 http://www.aifs.gov.au/afrc/pubs/briefing/b13pdf/b13.pdf.
56.
PARSONST. (1951) The Social System, Routledge, London
57.
PLUMMERK. (2003) Intimate Citizenship: Private Decisions and Public Dialogues, Washington Press.
58.
RIBBENS MCCARTHYJ., and EdwardsR. (2002) ‘The individual in public and private: the significance of mothers and children’, in CarlingA., DuncanS., and EdwardsR. (eds) Analysing Families: Morality and Rationality in Policy and Practice, London: Routledge.
59.
ROSEN. (2002). Powers of Freedom, Reframing Political Thought, Cambridge: Polity.
60.
ROSENEILS., and BudgeonS. (2004) Cultures of Intimacy and Care Beyond ‘the Family’: Personal Life and Social Change in the Early 21st Century, Current Sociology, Vol. 52, no 2, pp 135–159. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0011392104041798]
61.
SAYERA. (2005) The moral significance of class.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488863]
62.
SKEGGSB. (1997). Formations of Class and Gender, London: Sage.
STACEYJ. (1990). Brave New Families: Stories of Domestic Upheaval in Late Twentieth Century America, New York: Basic Books.
66.
STACEYJ. (1996). In the Name of the Family: Rethinking Family Values in the Postmodern Age, Boston: Beacon Press.
67.
STAINTON ROGERSR., and Stainton RogersW. (1992) Stories of Childhood: Shifting Agendas of Child ConcernHarvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
68.
STANLEYL. (1992). Changing households, Changing work. In AbercrombieN., & WardeA. (Eds.), Social Change in Contemporary Britain pp 85–102. Cambridge: Polity.
69.
TISDALLK. (2006) ‘Antisocial behaviour legislation meets children's services: challenging perspectives on children, parents and the state’, Critical Social Policy, vol 26, no 1, pp 101–20. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261018306059767]
70.
VAN EVERYJ. (1999) From modern nuclear households to postmodern diversity? The sociological construction of families. In JaggerG., and WrightC. (eds.), Changing Family Values.London & New York: Routledge.
VASCOVICSL. (1991) ‘Famile im Auflosungsprozess?’ in, Deutsches Jugendinstitut (ed.) Jahresbericht, pp. 186–98, Munich, cited in Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1998) On the way to a post-23 familiar family: from a community of need to elective affinities, Theory, Culture and Society, 15, 3-4, 53-70.
73.
WALKERDINEV. (2005) ‘Safety and danger: childhood, sexuality and space at the end of the millennium, in JenksC. (ed) Childhood: Critical Concepts in Sociology, London: Routledge.
74.
WEEKSJ. (2007) The World We Have Won, London: Routledge
75.
WEEKSJ., HeaphyB., and DonovanC. (2001). Same Sex Intimacies: Families of Choice and other Life Experiments, London: Routledge [doi://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203167168]
