ADLERE. (1992) ‘The Emergence of Cooperation: National Epistemic Communities and the International Evolution of the Idea of Nuclear Arms Control’, International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 101–145. [doi: 10.1017/S0020818300001466]
2.
ADLERE., and HAASP. M. (1992) ‘Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program’, International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 367–390. [doi: 10.1017/S0020818300001533]
3.
AMINA., and COHENDETP. (2004). Architectures of knowledge: Firms, capabilities, and communities, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
AMINA., and ROBERTSJ. (2008) ‘Knowing in action: Beyond communities of practice’, Research Policy, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 353–369. [doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.11.003]
5.
BORUPM., BROWNN., KONRADK., and VAN LENTEH. (2006) ‘The sociology of expectations in science and technology’, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 18, no. 3&4, pp. 285–298. [doi: 10.1080/09537320600777002]
6.
BROWNN. (2003) ‘Hope against hype: Accountability in biopasts, presents and futures’, Science Studies, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 3–21.
7.
BROWNN. (2006) ‘Shifting tenses-from ‘regimes of truth’ to ‘regimes of hope”, SATSU Working Paper No. 30, pp. 1–17.
8.
CAINJ. (2002) ‘Epistemic and community transition in American evolutionary studies: the ‘Committee on Common Problems of Genetics, Paleontology, and Systematics’ (1942-1949)’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 283–313. [doi: 10.1016/S0039-3681(02)00019-5]
9.
DUPREJ. (1993). The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
10.
ELZINGAA. (1993) ‘Science as the continuation of politics by other means’, in BranteT., FullerS., and LynchW. (editors) Controversial Science. From content to contention.State University New York Press, Albany, pp. 127–152.
11.
GALISONP. L., and STUMPD. J. (1996). The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
12.
GINGRASY. (1991). Physics and the rise of scientific research in Canada, Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
13.
HAASP.M. (1992) ‘Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’, International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 1–35. [doi: 10.1017/S0020818300001442]
14.
HAASP.M. (1989) ‘Do Regimes Matter? Epistemic Communities and Mediterranean Pollution’, International Organization, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 377–403. [doi: 10.1017/S0020818300032975]
15.
HODGSONS. (2006) ‘Narrating Community: history and absence in scientific texts’Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 175–188. [doi: 10.1179/030801806X103325]
16.
HOLZNERB. (1968) Reality construction in Society.Schenkman: Cambridge.
17.
HOLZNERB., and SALMON-COXL. (1977) ‘Conceptions of Research and Development for Education in the United States’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 434, pp. 88–100. [doi: 10.1177/000271627743400107]
18.
HOLZNERB., and MARXJ. (1979). Knowledge affiliation: the Knowledge system in society, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
19.
KNORR-CETINAK (1982) ‘Scientific Communities or Transepistemic Arenas of Research? A Critique of Quasi-Economic Models of Science’, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 101–130.
20.
KNORR-CETINAK. (1999). Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
21.
KUHNT. (1996 [1962]) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
22.
LAVEJ., and WENGERE. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
MOLYNEUX-HODGSONS, and MEYERM. (2009) ‘Tales of Emergence: synthetic biology as a scientific community in the making’, BioSocieties, Vol. 4, no. 2/3, pp. 129–145. [doi: 10.1017/S1745855209990019]
24.
NOWOTNYH., SCOTTP., and GIBBONSM. (2001). Re-Thinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Cambridge: Polity Press.
25.
SCOTTJ. (2005) ‘Sociology and Its Others: Reflections on Disciplinary Specialisation and Fragmentation’, Sociological Research Online, Vol. 10, No. 1, available online: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/1/scott.html. [doi: 10.5153/sro.1055]
26.
VAN HOUSEN. A. (2002) ‘Trust and epistemic communities in biodiversity data sharing’, Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, Portland, Oregon, USA.
27.
WENGERE. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
WENGERE. (2000) ‘Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems’, Organization, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 225–246. [doi: 10.1177/135050840072002]
29.
WHATMORES., and THORNEL. (1997) ‘Nourishing Networks. Alternative geographies of food’, in GoodmanD., and WattsM. J. (editors) Globalising food Agrarian Questions and Global Restructuring, London: Routledge, pp. 287–304.
30.
WHITLEYR.D. (1983) ‘From the sociology of scientific communities to the study of scientists’ negotiations and beyond’, Social Science Information, Vol. 22, no. 4-5, pp. 681–720. [doi: 10.1177/053901883022004004]