Calls to provincialise sociology have been criticised as relativistic and self-contradictory. Utilising the arguments of Boaventura de Sousa Santos and Peter Winch, the present paper defends a provincialised sociology against these criticisms and argues that only a provincialised sociology can meet the challenge of global social inquiry.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderJeffery. C.1982. Theoretical Logic in Sociology, Volume I, Positivism, Presuppositions and Current Controversies.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
2.
ArcherMargaret1988Culture and Agency, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BarnesBarry1977. Interests and the Growth of Knowledge.London: Routledge
4.
BhambraGurminder K.2007. Rethinking Modernity: Postcolonialism and the Sociological Imagination.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
5.
BurawoyMichael2005a. ‘ For public sociology.’American Sociological Review70: 2–28.
6.
BurawoyMichael2005b. ‘Conclusion: Provincializing the Social Sciences.’ in SteinmetGeorge (ed)The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences.London: Duke University Press, 508–25
7.
ChakrabartyDipesh2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
8.
ConnellRaewyn2007. Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science.Cambridge: Polity Press
9.
GiddensAnthony1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis.London: Macmillan.
10.
GiddensAnthony1984. The Constitution of Society, Cambridge: Polity.
11.
GouldnerAlvin1962. ‘Anti-minotaur: the myth of a value-free sociology.’Social Problems9: 192–213.
12.
HabermasJurgen1976. Legitimation Crisis.Translated by Thomas McCarthy. London: Heinemann.
13.
HabermasJurgen1981. ‘Talcott Parsons: problems of theory construction’Sociological Inquiry51(3).
14.
HabermasJurgen1984The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume I: Reason and the Rationalisation of Society. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. London: Heinemann.
15.
HabermasJurgen1987. The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume II: Lifeworld and System.Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Cambridge: Polity.
16.
HollisMartin1970. ‘The limits of irrationality.’ in WilsoB. R. (ed) RationalityNew York: Harper and Row.
17.
HolmwoodJohn2001. ‘Gender and critical realism: a critique of Sayer.’Sociology37: 947–65.
18.
KuhnThomas S.1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
LakatosImre1970. ‘Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes’ in LakatosI., MusgravA. eds. Criticism and the Growth of KnowledgeCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
LukesSteven1970. ‘Some problems about rationality.’ in WilsoB. R. (ed) Rationality, New York: Harper and Row.
21.
MooreBarringtonJr.1984. Privacy: Studies in Social and Cultural History, Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
22.
NelsonLynn Hankinson1990. Who Knows: From Quine to a Feminist Empiricism.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
23.
PollockSheldon, BhabhaHomi K., BreckenridgeCarol A., and ChakrabartyDipesh2000. ‘Cosmopolitanisms.’Public Culture12: 577–89.
24.
PopperKarl (1963) Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
25.
RortyRichard (1980) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature.Oxford: Blackwell
26.
RortyRichard1997. Achieving Our Country Leftist Thought in Twentieth Century America.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
RortyRichard1998. ‘Hilary Putnam and the relativist menace’ in Truth and Progress: Philosophical Papers.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
SantosBoaventura de Sousa (ed.). 2007. Another Knowledge is Possible: Beyond Northern Epistemologies.London: Verso.
29.
SayerAndrew2000. ‘System, Lifeworld and gender: associational versus counterfactual thinking.’Sociology34: 707–25.
30.
WinchPeter1970. ‘Understanding a primitive culture’ in WilsoBryan R. (ed) RationalityNew York: Harper and Row.
