This article draws on data from a qualitative study of children living in
families with either low or high levels of household income and outlines the
intrafamilial dynamics that surround young children's relationships to
contemporary consumer culture. The motivation for parents to provide their
children with particular commodities, how parents prioritised children's
requests and the rationale they used to buy or not to buy certain items was much
more complex than parents simply ‘giving in’ to pester power. In the main,
parents were making very considered judgements based on a range of factors.
Wider social changes were seen as being contributory to new forms of consumption
and thus new experiences of childhood which meant parents having to deal with an
aspect of their children's lives that was much more problematic than they had
experienced in their own childhoods.
BelkR., and
COONGS
(1993) Giving as Agapic Love: An Alternative to
the Exchange Paradigm Based on Dating Experiences.
Journal of Consumer Research Vol. 20
December 1993 pp 393–417.
2.
BelkR.
(1995). Studies in the new consumer
behaviour. in Acknowledging consumption: a review of
new studies. D. Miller. London:
Routledge.
3.
BerhauP
(2000) ‘Class and the Experience of Consumers: A
Study of Practices of Acquisition’ unpublished dissertation, Temple
University in Pugh, Allison J (2004) ‘Windfall Child Rearing: Low Income
Care and Consumption.’Journal of Consumer Culture Vol.
4(2) pp.
229–249. London: Sage
4.
BrusdalR.
(2005). ‘Good and bad consumption: Parents and
children's consumption’ Paper presented Childhoods 2005:Children
and Youth in Emerging and Transforming Societies Conference. University of
Oslo
5.
CarvelJ.
(2000). TV Ads. ‘have little effect’ on
children. The Guardian Saturday November 11
p. 7.
ChinE.
(2001). Purchasing Power: Black Kids and American
Consumer CultureUniversity of Minnesota Press.
8.
CookD.
(2005) The Dichotomous Child in and of
Commercial Culture. Childhood Vol.
12(2) p
155–159
9.
CorsaroW.
(1998) The Sociology of Childhood.London: Pine Forge
Press.
10.
CromptonR.
(1996). ‘Consumption and Class Analysis’
inConsumption Matters.EdgellS.
(Eds.) Oxford: Blackwell
Publishers.
11.
CrossG.
(2004). Wondrous Innocence: Print Advertising
and the Origins of Permissive Child Rearing in the US.
Journal of Consumer Culture Vol. (4) pp
183–201.
London:
Sage
12.
EriksonE.
(1963) Childhood and society.New York: Norton &
Co.
13.
FurnhamA.
(2000). in TV Ads. ‘have little effect’ on children by John
Carvel The Guardian November 11 2000 p.
7
14.
GiddensA.
(1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in
the late modern age.Cambridge: Polity
Press.
15.
GunterB, and
FURNHAMA
(1998) Children as Consumers: A Psychological Analysis
of the Young People's Market.London:
Routledge.
16.
HillM., and
TISDALLK.
(1997) Children and Society.London:
Longman.
17.
Hood-WilliamsJ.
(1990). Patriarchy for Children: On the
stability of Power relations in Children's lives.
Childhood, Youth and Social Change. Chisolm et al.
London: Falmer
Press.
18.
IsaacsS.
(1935). “Symposium on property and
possessiveness.”Medical Psychology1569–78.
19.
JacksonS.,
SCOTTS, and
BACKETT-MILBURNK.
(2000). Remembering, rationalising and reflecting on
risk: how parents’ childhood memories features in accounts of risk to their
children. BSA ‘Making Time/Marking Time’,
University of York.
20.
JamesA.,
JENKSC, and
PROUTA.
(1998) Theorising Childhood.Oxford: Polity
Press
21.
KempsonE.,
BRYSONA, and
ROWLINGSONK.
(1994) Hard Times: How Poor Families Make Ends
Meet.London: Policy studies
Institute.
22.
LivingstoneS.
(1998). Mediated Childhoods: a comparative
approach to young people's changing media environment in
Europe. European Journal of Communication
(13) 4,
435–56.
23.
LuntP., and
LIVINGSTONES.
(1992) Mass consumption & personal
identity.London: OU
Press.
24.
MartensL.,
SOUTHERTOND.,
and SCOTTS.
(2004) Bringing Children (and Parents) into the
Sociology of Consumption. Journal of Consumer
Culture Vol. 4(2) pp.
155–182.
London:
Sage
25.
McnealJ.
(1998) “Tapping the three kids’
market.”American Demographics20(April): pp
37–41.
26.
MiddletonS.,
ASHWORTHK.,
WALKERR.
(1994) Family Fortunes: Pressures on parents and
children in the 1990s.London: Child Poverty Action
Group.
27.
NelderR.,
and MACHONACIEM.
(1997). Deprivation Scores at Neighbourhood Level
within Plymouth City.Public Health Team South & West Devon Health
Authority.
28.
PahlR.
(1984) Divisions of Labour.Oxford: Blackwell
Publishers.
29.
PowerE.
(2005) The Unfreedom of Being Other: Canadian
Lone Mothers’ Experiences of Poverty and Life on the Cheque.
Sociology Vol. 39(4) p
643–660
30.
ProutA.
(2000). Opening Address. Children: Making their
future? Research and Policy for the 21st Century. London (Final
Conference ESRC 5-16 research programme).
31.
PughA.
(2002). From “Compensation” to “Childhood Wonder”: Why
Parents Buy. Working Paper No 39. Centre for Working Families,
University of California
Berkeley
32.
PughA.
(2004) ‘Windfall Child Rearing: Low Income Care
and Consumption.’Journal of Consumer Culture Vol.
4(2) pp.
229–249. London: Sage
33.
RiceM.
(2000). What little girls are made
of. The Observer 3rd December p.
18–31 (Life magazine).
34.
SchorJ.
(2004) Born to Buy: The Commercialized Child and the
New Consumer Culture.New York:
Scribner
35.
SeiterE.
(1993) Sold separately: parents and children in
consumer culture.New Brunswick, New Jersey:
Rutgers University Press.
36.
SmithR.
(2000) “The contradictions of
childhood.”Children & Society14(1) p.
3–10.
37.
SOCIAL TRENDS,
(2005) Office for National Statistics.London:
HMSO.
38.
StewartF.
(1992). The adolescent as
Consumer. Youth Policy in the 1990s: the way
forward. J. Coleman and C. Warren-Adamson (Eds.)
London:
Routledge.
39.
ThomsonR.
(2000). Researching childhood: time, memory and
method. Paper presented BSA Annual Conference ‘Making
Time/ Marking Time. University of York.
