ALASUUTARIP.
(1995) Researching Cuture: Qualitative Method and
Cultural Studies.London:
Sage.
2.
BLUMERH.
(1969) ‘Social movements’ in
McLaughlinB.
(editor) Studies in Social Movements: A Social Psychological
Perspective.New York: Free
Press.
3.
COFFEYA.,
& ATKINSONP.
(1996) Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary
Research Strategies.Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
4.
COFFEYA.,
HOLBROOKB.,
& ATKINSONP.1996. ‘Qualitative data analysis: technologies and
representations’, Sociological Research
Online, vol. 1, no. 1,
<http://www.socresonline.org.uk/1/1/4.html>.
5.
CORDINGLEYE.
(1991) ‘The Upside and Downside of Hypertext
Tools: The KANT Example’ in
FieldingN.
G., & LeeR.
M. (editors) Using Computers in Qualitative
Research.London:
Sage.
6.
FIELDINGN.
G., & LEER.
M. (1991) Using Computers in
Qualitative Research.London:
Sage.
7.
FIELDINGN.
G., & LEER.
M. (forthcoming) Computer Analysis and
Qualitative Research.London:
Sage.
8.
GLASERB. G.
(1978) Theoretical Sensitivity.Mill Valley, CA: Sociology
Press.
9.
GLASERB. G.,
& STRAUSSA. L.
(1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory.Chicago:
Aldine.
10.
HEATHERN.,
& LEER.M.
(1995) ‘Expert Systems for the Social
Scientist’ in
LeeR.M.
(editor) Information Technology for the Social Scientist.London: UCL
Press.
11.
KELLEU.
(1995) Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis:
Theory: Methods and Practice.London:
Sage.
12.
KLINGR.,
& IACONOS.
(1988) ‘The Mobilization of Support for
Computerization: The Role of Computerization Movements’,
Social Problems, vol. 35, pp.
226–43.
13.
LAZARSFELDP.
F., &
BARTONA. H.
(1951) ‘Qualitative Measurement in the Social
Sciences: Classification, Typologies and Indices’ in
LernerD.,
& LasswellH.D.,
(editors) The Policy Sciences: Recent Developments in Scope and
Method.Stanford, CA: Stanford University
Press.
14.
LEER.
M., &
FIELDINGN. G.
(1995) ‘Users’ Experiences of Qualitative Data
Analysis Software’ in
KelleU.
(editor) Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis: Theory, Methods and
Practice.London:
Sage.
15.
LONKILAM.
(1995) ‘Grounded Theory as an Emerging Paradigm
for Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis’ in
KelleU.
(editor) Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis: Theory, Methods and
Practice.London:
Sage.
16.
MILESM. B.
(1983) ‘Qualitative Data as an Attractive
Nuisance: The Problem of Analysis’ in
MaanenJ.V.
(editor) Qualitative Methodology.Beverly Hills:
Sage.
17.
PLATTJ.
(1983) ‘The Development of the “Participant
Observation” Method in Sociology: Origin Myth and History’,
Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, vol.
19, pp.
379–93.
18.
PLATTJ.
(1995) ‘Research Methods and the Second Chicago
School’ in
FineG.
(editor) A Second Chicago School: the Development of a Postwar American
Sociology, London:
University of Chicago
Press.
19.
RAGINC. C.
(1995) ‘Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis
to Study Configurations’ in
KelleU.
(editor) Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis: Theory, Methods and
Practice.London:
Sage.
20.
SEIDELJ. V.
(1985) The Ethnograph Verson 2.0 User's
Manual.Littleton, CO: Qualis Research
Associates.
21.
SEIDELJ. V.
(1988) The Ethnograph Verson 3.0 User's
Manual.Littleton, CO: Qualis Research
Associates.
22.
SEIDELJ. V.,
& CLARKJ. A.
(1984) ‘THE ETHNOGRAPH: A Computer Program for
the Analysis of Qualitative Data’, Qualitative
Sociology, vol. 7, pp.
110–25.
23.
STRAUSSA. L.
(1987) Qualitative Analysis for Social
Scientists.Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
24.
STRAUSSA.
L., &
CORBINJ.
(1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory
Procedures and Techniques.Newbury Park, CA:
Sage.
25.
WEAVERA.,
& ATKINSONP.
(1995) Microcomputing and Qualitative Data
Analysis.Aldershot:
Avebury.
26.
WEITZMANE.
A., & MILESM.
B. (1995) Computer Programs
for Qualitative Data Analysis.Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
