Starting from the vantage point of a ‘relational ontology’ this paper explores
the complex relationship networks of people who are single or are not living
with a sexual partner. The ways in which people make sense of the boundaries of
their connections is analysed. It is argued that the meaning of individual
social bonds emerge relationally and that by asking why and how friendship
matters to people, we begin to see what other kinds of interpersonal
relationships also mean and why they matter. This lends insights into the ways
relational networks operate within conditions of detraditionalisation and the
emergence of non-linear life courses. In particular consideration is given to
both the epistemic and ethical dimension through which friendship operate in
daily life.
AdamsR.G.,
and AllanG.
(editors). (1998) Placing Friendship in Context.Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
2.
BaumanZ.
(2003). Liquid Love.Cambridge:
Polity.
3.
Bawin-Legros (2004)
‘Intimacy and the New Sentimental Order’,
Current Sociology, Vol. 52, No.
2: 241–250.
4.
BeckU., and
Beck-GernscheimE.
(1995). The Normal Chaos of Love.Cambridge:
Polity.
5.
Beck-GernscheimE.
(1999) ‘On the Way to a Post-Familial Family:
From a Community of Need to Elective Affinities’,
Theory, Culture and Society. Vol. 15, No.
3-4: 53–70.
6.
BenhabibS.
(1992). ‘The Generalized and the Concrete Other’
pp. 265-300, in
FrazerElizabeth;
HornsbyJennifer,
and LovibondSabina
(editors), Ethics: A Feminist Reader.Oxford:
Blackwell.
7.
BerlantL.,
and WarnerM.
(2000). ‘Sex in Public’, in
BerlantL.
(editor), Intimacy.Chicago, IL: Chicago University
Press.
8.
DaviesJon;
BergerBrigitte,
and CarlsonAlan
(1993). The Family: Is It Just Another Lifestyle
Choice?London: IEA Health and Economic
Unit.
9.
DuncanS.,
and SmithD.
(2002). ‘Geographies of Family Formations:
Spatial Differences and Gender Cultures in Britain’,
Transactions, Vol. 27:
471–93.
10.
DuncombeJean,
and DennisMarsden
(1999). ‘Love and Intimacy: The Gender Division
of Emotion and ‘Emotion Work” in
AllanGraham
(editor). The Sociology of the Family: A Reader,
Oxford:
Blackwell.
11.
FriedmanM.
(1993). What Are Friends For? Feminist Perspectives on
Personal Relationships and Moral Theory.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University
Press.
12.
GiddensA.
(1991) Modernity and Self-Identity.Cambridge:
Polity
13.
GiddensA.
(1992. The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love
and Eroticism in Modern Society.Cambridge:
Polity.
14.
HeelasP.
(1996). ‘Introduction: Detraditionalization and
It's Rivals’ pp. 1–20 in
HeelasP.;
LashS.;, and
MorrisP
(editors), Detraditionalization.Cambridge:
Blackwell.
15.
HockeyJ.,
and JamesA.
(2003). Social Identities Across the Life
Course.Basingstoke: Palgrave
MacMillan.
16.
JamiesonL.
(1997) Intimacy: Personal Relationships in Modern
SocietiesCambridge:
Polity.
17.
MorganD.H.J.
(1996). Family Connections.Cambridge: Polity
Press.
18.
PahlR.
(1998). ‘Friendship: The Social Glue of
Contemporary Society?’ in
FranklinJ.
(editor). The Politics of Risk SocietyCambridge Polity.
19.
PahlR.
(2000). On Friendship.Cambridge:
Polity.
20.
RabinowP.
(1997). The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, Vol. 1,
Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth.London:
Penguin.
21.
RaymondJ.
(1986). A Passion for Friends: Toward a Philosophy of
Female Affection.London: Women's
Press.
RoseneilS.
(2000b). ‘Queer Frameworks and Queer Tendencies:
Towards an Understanding of Postmodern Transformations of
Sexuality’, Sociological Review Online,
5(3): at: http://www/socresonline.org.uk/5/3/roseneil.html.
24.
RoseneilSasha,
and BudgeonShelley
(2004). ‘Cultures of Intimacy and Care Beyond
‘The Family’: Personal Life and Social Change in the Early 21st
Century’, Current Sociology, Vol.
52, No. 2:
135–139.
25.
RustinM.
(2000). ‘Reflections on the biographical Turn in
Social Science’ in
ChamberlayneP.,
BornatJ., and
WengrafT.
(editors), The Turn to Biographical Methods in Social Science.London:
Routledge.
26.
SilvaE., and
SmartC.
(1999). ‘The ‘New’ Practices and Politics of
Family Life’ in
SilvaE., and
SmartC.
(editors), The New Family?London:
Sage.
27.
WestonKath1991. Families We Choose: Lesbian, Gays and
Kinship, New York:
Columbia University Press.
28.
WeeksJeffrey,
DonovanCatherine,
and HeaphyBrian
(1999). ‘Everyday Experiments: Narratives of
Non-heterosexual Relationships’, in
SmartC., and
SilvaE
(editors), The New Family?.London:
Sage.
29.
WeeksJeffrey,
DonovanCatherine,
and BrainHeaphy
(2001). Same Sex Intimacies: Families of Choice and
other Life Experiments, London:
Routledge.
30.
WrightCarolyn,
and GillJagger
(1999). ‘End of Century, End of Family? Shifting
Discourses of Family in ‘Crisis”, in
JaggerG., and
WrightC.
(editors). Changing Family Values.London:
Routledge.
