Abstract
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BHASKAR
R.
(1979 ) The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical
Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences ,
Brighton :
Harvester.
2.
BYRNE
D.
(1997 ) ‘Simulation - A Way
Forward’ , Sociological Research Online ,
vol. 2 , no. 2 , <http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/2/4.html>.
3.
CRUTCHFIELD
J.
P.
(1992 ) ‘Knowledge and
Meaning: Chaos and Complexity’ in
Lam
L.
, and
Naroditsky
V.
(editors) Modelling Complex Phenomena.
New York :
Springer-Verlag.
4.
GILBERT
N.
(1997 ) ‘A Simulation of the Structure of
Academic Science’ , Sociological Research
Online , vol. 2 , no. 2 ,
<http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/2/3.html>.
5.
HALFPENNY
P.
(1982 ) Positivism and Sociology: Explaining Social
Life.
London : George Allen and
Unwin.
6.
HARRE
R.
(1970 ) The Principles of Scientific Thinking.
London :
Macmillan.
7.
HEMPEL
C. G.
(1942 ) ‘The Function of General Laws in
History’ , Journal of Philosophy , vol.
39 , pp.
35 –48 .
8.
SKJERVHEIM
H.
(1974 ) ‘Objectivism and the Study of Manchester
(Part I)’ , Inquiry , vol.
17 , pp.
213 –239 .
9.
TURNER
S. P.
(1980 ) Sociological Explanation as
Translation.
Cambridge : Cambridge University
Press.
10.
WINCH
P.
(1958 ) The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to
Philosophy.
London : Routledge & Kegan
Paul.
11.
WOOLGAR
S.
(1988 ) Science: The Very Idea.
London :
Tavistock.