Responding to John Scott's (2005) ‘Sociology and its others’, the idea of
hybridic sociologies is developed, Mills’ ideas about ‘the sociological
imagination’ are discussed, Scott's proposal for a core curriculum countered
with some suggestions for extended in-depth disciplinary debate about an
intellectually expansionist programme for UK sociology, and responses to these
suggestions as well as to the broad argument are welcomed.
AbbottPamela, WALLACEClaire, and TYLERMelissa (2005, 3rd
edition). Introduction to Sociology: Feminist
Perspectives.London:
Routledge.
2.
AronowitzStanley (ed, 2004).
C. Wright Mills.London: Sage
Publications.
3.
BergerPeter (2002).
‘Whatever Happened to Sociology?’First Things126 (October 2002):
27–29.
4.
BrewerJohn (2003). C.
Wright Mills and the Ending of Violence.Basingstoke: Palgrave
Macmillan.
5.
BrewerJohn (2004).
“Imagining The Sociological Imagination: the
biographical context of a sociological classic”British Journal of Sociology55, 3, pp.
317–33.
6.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF
SOCIOLOGY (2000). Special Issue on
“Sociology Facing the Next Millennium”British Journal of Sociology51, no 1.
7.
BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL
ASSOCIATION (2005). BSA Executive Committee
Minute /05/53.
8.
BurawoyMichael (2004).
“Public sociologies: contradictions, dilemmas and
possibilities”Social Forces82, pp. 1603–18.
9.
CastellsManuel (2000a, updated
edition). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture
(3 volumes). Oxford:
Blackwell.
10.
CastellsManuel (2000b).
“Materials for an exploratory theory of the network
society”British Journal of Sociology51, pp. 5–24.
11.
ColeStephen (2001, ed).
What's Wrong With Sociology?New York: Transaction
Publishers.
12.
CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY,
(2000). Special Issue on “Utopian Visions:
Engaged Sociologies for the 21st Century”Contemporary Sociology Vol. 29, No.
1.
13.
EldridgeJohn (1983). C.
Wright Mills.London: Tavistock
Publications/Ellis Horwood.
14.
Esping-AndersenGosta (2000).
“Two societies, one sociology, and no theory”British Journal of Sociology51, pp. 59–77.
HennessyRosemary (2000)
Profit and Pleasure: Sexual Identities in Late CapitalismNew York:
Routledge.
22.
HollandsRobert, and
STANLEYLiz (forthcoming) “Back to the
future? Gouldner, critical sociology and the myth of the continuing ‘Coming
Crisis’” Paper in progress.
23.
HowowitzIrving (1993). The
Decomposition of Sociology.New York: Oxford University
Press.
24.
JacksonStevi (1999).
“Feminist Sociology and Sociological Feminism: Recovering the
Social in Feminist Thought”Sociological Research Online, Vol. 4, No.
3, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/4/3/jackson.html
25.
JohnsonRichard (1983). “What
is cultural studies anyway” Stencilled paper no 74, Birmingham
Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies.
LawJohn, and URRYJohn (2004).
“Enacting the social”Economy and Society33, pp. 390–410.
28.
MclennanGregor (2003).
“Sociology's complexity”Sociology37, pp. 547–64.
29.
MatonCarl (2002).
“Popes, Kings and cultural studies: Placing the commitment to
non-disciplinarity in historical context”, in (ed)
HerbrechterS.Cultural Studies: Interdisciplinarity and TranslationAmsterdam:
Rodopi. Also at http://www.autodidactproject.org/other/PKCS.html (accessed 28
June 2005).
30.
MillmanMarcia, and
KANTERRosabeth Moss (eds, 1975).
Another Voice: Feminist Perspectives on Social Life and Social
Science.New York: Anchor
Books.
31.
MillsCharles Wright (1959).
The Sociological Imagination.New York: Oxford University
Press.
32.
MillsCharles Wright (2001).
C. Wright Mills: Letters and Autobiographical Writings.
(eds MillsPamela, and MillsKathryn) University of
California Press:
Berkeley.
33.
MyersKristen A.,
ANDERSONCynthia D.,
RISMANBarbara J. (eds, 1998).
Feminist Foundations: Toward Transforming SociologyLondon: Sage
Publications.
34.
PhillipsBernard, KINCAIDHarold, andSCHEFF, ThomasJ. (2002) Towards A
Sociological Imagination: Bridging Specialized Fields.Lanham, Md: University Press of
America.
35.
RismanBarbara J.,
TOMASKOVIC-DEVEYDonald, and DIMESMartha (2000).
“Editors’ note”Contemporary Sociology29, 1, p. v.
36.
RojeckChris, and TURNERBryan (2001)
“Decorative sociology: Towards a critique of the cultural
turn”Sociological Review48, pp. 629–648.
37.
SayerAndrew (2000).
“For postdisciplinary studies: sociology and the curse of
disciplinary parochialism and imperialism” in (eds)
EldridgeJohn, MacInnesJohn, ScottSue, WarhurstChris, and WitzAnneFor Sociology: Legacy and Prospects.Durham, UK:
sociologypress.
38.
ScottJohn (2005).
“Sociology and its others: reflections on disciplinary
specialisation and fragmentation”Sociological Research Online10, 1, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/1/scott.html
39.
SilverstoneRoger (1994)
“The power of the ordinary: on cultural studies and the
sociology of culture”Sociology28, pp.
991–1001.
40.
SmithDorothy (1974).
“Women's perspective as a radical critique of
sociology”, Sociological Quarterly44, pp. 7–13.
41.
SmithDorothy (1987). The
Everyday World As Problematic: A Feminist Sociology.Buckingham: Open University
Press.
42.
SmithDorothy (1990a). The
Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge.Boston: Northeastern University
Press.
43.
SmithDorothy (1990b).
Texts, Facts and Femininity: Exploring the Relations of
Ruling.London:
Routledge.
44.
SmithDorothy (1999).
Writing the Social: Critique, Theory, and Investigations.Toronto: University of Toronto
Press.
45.
SmithDorothy (2005).
Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People.California: AltaMira
Press.
46.
SOCIOLOGICAL FORUM,
(1994). Special issue on ‘What's wrong with
sociology?’Sociological Forum9, 2.
47.
SOCIOLOGICAL FORUM,
(1995a). Commentary on ‘What's wrong with
sociology?’Sociological Forum10, 2, pp.
309–323.
48.
SOCIOLOGICAL FORUM,
(1995b) Commentary on ‘What's wrong is
right’Sociological Forum10, 3, pp.
493–98.
49.
StanleyLiz (1990, ed).
Feminist Praxis: Research, Theory And Epistemology In Feminist
Sociology.London:
Routledge.
50.
StanleyLiz (2000).
“For sociology, Gouldner's and ours” in (eds)
EldridgeJohn, MacInnesJohn, ScottSue, WarhurstChris, and WitzAnneFor Sociology: Legacy and Prospects.Durham, UK:
sociologypress.
51.
StanleyLiz, and WISESue (1993). Breaking
Out Again: Feminist Ontology and Epistemology.London:
Routledge.
52.
StapletonJulia (2001).
Political Intellectuals and Public Identities in Britain Since
1850.Manchester: Manchester University
Press.
53.
TurnerStephen, and
TURNERJonathan (1990). The
Impossible Science: An Institutional Analysis of American
Sociology.Newbury Park, California: Sage
Publications.
54.
UrryJohn (1981).
“Sociology as a parasite: some vices and
virtues” in (eds) AbramsPhilip, DeemRosemary, FinchJanet, and RockPaulPractice and Progress: British Sociology, 1950-1980.London: George Allen &
Unwin.
55.
UrryJohn (2000a).
Sociology Beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-First
Century.London:
Routledge.
56.
UrryJohn (2000b).
“Mobile sociology”British Journal of Sociology51, pp. 185–203.
WallersteinImmanuel (1999). The
End of the World As We Know It: Social Science for the Twenty-First
Century.Minneapolis: University of
Minnesota Press.
