The utility of a new questionnaire, the Personal Problems Questionnaire (PPQ), designed to assess cognitive, emotional and physical complaints after traumatic brain injuries, pain, and other acquired conditions, was evaluated. The PPQ comprises twelve Clinical subscales designed to assess common complaints associated with acquired conditions and three Validity scales to evaluate over-reporting of cognitive, emotional, and physical symptoms. The Clinical subscales were found to be useful in differentiating between patients with acquired brain injuries, controls, and simulators. The Validity scales were also found to have good sensitivity and specificity in detecting simulated complaints. The PPQ shows promise in assessing disabilities and over-reporting.
Ben-PorathY.S. (2012). Interpreting the MMPI-2-RF.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
2.
ChafetzM. D., PrentkowskiE., & RaoA. (2011). To work or not to work: Motivation (not low IQ) determines symptom validity test findings. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26, 306-313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acr030
3.
CragarD. E., BerryD. T. R., FakhouryT. A., CibulkaJ. A., & SchmidtF. A. (2007). Performance of patients with epilepsy or psychogenic nonepileptic seizures on four measures of effort. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 552-566. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13854040590947380
4.
DelisD. C., & WetterS. R. (2007). Cogniform disorder and cogniform condition: Proposed diagnoses for excessive cognitive symptoms. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22, 589-604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2007.04.001
5.
FlaroL., GreenP., & RobertsonE. (2007). Word Memory Test failure 23 times higher in mild brain injury than in parents seeking custody: the power of external incentives. Brain Injury, 21, 373-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699050701311133
6.
GabbeB. J., CameronP. A., WilliamsonO. D., EdwardsE. R., GravesS. E., & RichardsonM. D. (2007). The relationship between the compensable status and long-term patient outcomes following orthopaedic trauma. Medical Journal of Australia, 187, 14-17.
7.
GervaisR. O., RohlingM. L., GreenP., & FordW. (2004). A comparison of WMT, CARB, and TOMM failure rates in non-head injury disability claimants. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 475-487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2003.05.001
8.
GreenP. (2005). Green's Word Memory Test for Microsoft Windows: Users manual.Seattle: Greens Publishing.
9.
GreiffensteinM., BakerW. J., & GolaT. (1994). Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 6, 218-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.3.218
10.
HawesS. W., & BoccacciniM. T. (2009). Detection of over-reporting of psychopathology on the Personality Assessment Inventory: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Assessment, 21, 112-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015036
11.
KellyP. J., BakerG. A., van den BroekM. D., JacksonH., & HumphriesG. (2005). The detection of malingering in memory performance: The sensitivity and specificity of four measures in a UK population. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 333-341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466505X35687
12.
KempS., CoughlanA. K., RowbottomC., WilkinsonK., TeggartV., & BakerG. (2008). The base rate of effort test failure in patients with medically unexplained symptoms. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 65, 319-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.02.010
13.
LarrabeeG. J. (2003). Detection of malingering using a typical performance patterns on standard neuropsychological tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17, 410-425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1076/clin.17.3.410.18089
14.
LarrabeeG. J. (2007). Malingering, research designs and base rates. In LarrabeeG. J. (Ed.), Assessment of malingered neuropsychological deficits (pp. 3-13). New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
MittenbergW., PattonC., CanjockE. M., & ConditD. C. (2002). Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 1094-1102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1076/jcen.24.8.1094.8379
16.
MoreyL. C. (1991). Professional manual for the Personality Assessment Inventory.Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
17.
NeudeckerJ. J., & SkeelR. L. (2009). Development of a novel malingering detection method involving multiple detection strategies. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24, 59-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acp008
18.
RogersR. (2008a). Detection strategies for malingering and defensiveness. In RogersR. (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd ed., pp. 14-32). New York: Guilford Press.
19.
RogersR. (2008b). Researching response styles. In RogersR. (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception. (3rd ed., pp. 411-434). New York: Guilford Press.
20.
RogersR. (2008c). Structured interviews and dissimulation. In RogersR. (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception. (3rd ed., pp. 301-322). New York: Guilford Press.
21.
RogersR., BagbyR. M., & DickensS. E. (1992). Structured interview of reported symptoms (SIRS) and professional manual.Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
22.
SellbomM., & BagbyR. M. (2010). Detection of overreported psychopathology with the MMPI-2-RF validity scales. Psychological Assessment, 22, 757-767. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020825
23.
TellegenA., & Ben-PorathY. S. (2008). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF): Technical manual.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
24.
TombaughT. N. (1996). Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM).New York: Multi-Health Systems.
25.
van den BroekM.D., & MonaciL. (2011). Effectiveness of the Personal Problems Questionnaire in detecting non-credible symptoms in acquired neurological disorders. Second European Symposium on Symptom Validity Testing, May 20–21, 2011.Conference Proceedings & Poster, London: University College London.
26.
WolfeP. L., MillisS. R., HanksR., FichtenbergN., LarrabeeG. J., & SweetJ. J. (2010). Effort indicators within the California Verbal Learning Test-II (CVLT-II). The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 24, 153-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13854040903107791
27.
WygantD. B., Ben-PorathY. S., ArbisiP. A., BerryD. T. R., FreemanD. B., & HeilbronnerR. L. (2009). Examination of the MMPI-2 restructured form (MMPI-2-RF) validity scales in civil frantic settings: Findings from simulation and known group samples. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27, 671-680. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acp073
