This study examines the effects of community-level and individual-level factors on access to ambulatory care for lower-income adults in 54 urban metropolitan statistical areas in the United States. Drawing on a conceptual behavioral and structural framework of access, the authors developed multivariate models for insured and uninsured lower-income adults to assess the adjusted effects of community- and individual-level factors on two indicators of access: having a usual source of care, and having at least one physician visit in the past year. Several community factors influenced access, but they did so differently for insured and uninsured adults and for the two measures of access used. The findings of this study confirm that public policies and community environment have measurable and substantial impacts on access to care, and that expanded public resources, such as Medicaid payments and safety-net clinics, can lead to measurable improvements in access for vulnerable populations residing in large urban areas.
References
1.
AdamsE. K.1994. Effect of Increased Medicaid Fees on Physician Participation and Enrollee Service Utilization in Tennessee, 1985–1988. Inquiry. 31 (2): 173–187.
2.
AdayL. A.2001. At Risk in America, 2nd edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
3.
American Hospital Association (AHA). 1997. Annual Survey of Hospitals Data Base, Fiscal Year 1997 (Question 7, p. 13). Chicago: AHA.
4.
AndersenR. M.1968. A Behavioral Model of Families' Use of Health Services. Research Series No. 25. Chicago: Center for Health Administration Studies, University of Chicago.
5.
AndersenR. M.1995. Revisiting the Behavioral Model and Access to Medical Care: Does It Matter?Journal of Health and Social Behavior36: 1–10.
6.
AndersenR. M.DavidsonP. L., 2001. Improving Access to Care in America: Individual and Contextual Indicators. In Changing the U.S. Health Care System: Key Issues in Health Services, Policy, and Management, AndersenR.RiceT.KominskiJ., eds. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
7.
AndersenR.YuH.WynR.DavidsonP. L.BrownE. R.TelekiS., 2002. Access to Health Care: How Do Communities Make a Difference?Medical Care Research and Review59 (4): 384–411.
8.
Area Resource File. 1999. User Documentation for the Area Resource File. Rockville, Md.: Office of Research and Planning, Bureau of Health Professions, Health Resources and Services Administration, Department of Health and Human Services.
9.
BrownE. R.WynR.TelekiS., 2000. Disparities in Health Insurance and Access to Care for Residents Across American Cities. New York and Los Angeles: The Commonwealth Fund and the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research.
10.
Claritas/NPDC, Inc. 1997. Corporate Headquarters, San Diego, Calif. Available at: http://www.claritas.com.
11.
CoburnA. F.LongS. H.MarquisM. S., 1999. Effects of Changing Medicaid Fees on Physician Participation and Enrollee Access. Inquiry36 (3): 265–279.
12.
CunninghamP. J.1999. Pressures on Safety Net Access: The Level of Managed Care Penetration and Uninsurance Rate in a Community. Health Services Research34 (1): 255–269.
13.
CunninghamP. J.GrossmanJ. M.St. PeterR. F.LesserC. S., 1999. Managed Care and Physicians' Provision of Charity Care. Journal of the American Medical Association281 (12): 1087–1092.
14.
DavidsonP. L.AndersenR.WynR.BrownE. R., 2004. A Framework for Evaluating Effects of the Safety Net and Other Community-Level Factors on Access for Low-Income Populations. Inquiry41 (1): 21–38.
15.
FanningT.de AlteriisM., 1993. The Limits of Marginal Economic Incentives in the Medicaid Program: Concerns and Cautions. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law18 (1): 27–42.
16.
ForrestC. B.WhelanE. M., 2000. Primary Care Safety-Net Delivery Sites in the United States: A Comparison of Community Health Centers, Hospital Outpatient Departments, and Physician Offices. Journal of the American Medical Association284 (16): 2077–2083.
17.
GrumbachK.VranizanK.BindmanA. B., 1997. Physician Supply and Access to Care in Urban Communities. Health Affairs16 (1): 71–86.
18.
Institute of Medicine (IOM), Committee on the Changing Market, Managed Care, and the Future Viability of Safety Net Providers. 2000. America's Health Care Safety Net, Intact but Endangered. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
19.
Institute of Medicine (IOM), Committee on the Consequences of Uninsurance. 2003. A Shared Destiny: Community Effects of Uninsurance. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
KawachiI.KennedyB. P., 1997. The Relationship of Income Inequality to Mortality: Does the Choice of Indicator Matter?Social Science and Medicine45 (7): 1121–1127.
23.
LaveJ. R.KeaneC. R.LinC. J.RicciE. M.AmersbachG.LaValleeC. P., 1998. Impact of a Children's Health Insurance Program on Newly Enrolled Children. Journal of the American Medical Association279 (22): 1820–1825.
24.
LongS. H.MarquisM. S., 1999. Geographic Variation in Physician Visits for Uninsured Children: The Role of the Safety Net. Journal of the American Medical Association281 (21): 2035–2040.
25.
LurieN.WardN. B.ShapiroM. F.GallegoC.VaghaiwallaR.BrookR. H., 1986. Termination of Medi-Cal Benefits: A Follow-Up Study One Year Later. New England Journal of Medicine314 (19): 1266–1268.
26.
MeyerJ. A.LegniniM. W.FatulaE. K.StepnickL. S., 1999. The Role of Local Governments in Financing Safety Net Hospitals: Houston, Oakland, and Miami. Assessing the New Federalism Project, Occasional Paper Number 25. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.
27.
MitchellJ. B.1991. Physician Participation in Medicaid Revisited. Medical Care29 (7): 645–653.
28.
National Governors Association. 1997. MCH Update: State Medicaid Coverage of Pregnant Women and Children. (Sept. 30). Available at: www.nga.org/cda/files/MCHUPDATEO997.pdf.
29.
NortonS. A.LipsonD. J., 1998. Public Policy, Market Forces, and the Viability of the Safety Net Providers. Assessing the New Federalism Project, Occasional Paper Number 13. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.
30.
Vital Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1997. HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report. 9 (2): 8–9.
