Abstract
The study findings will inform clinicians on efficacious driving interventions that mitigate the occurrence of real-world traffic violations and crashes for at-risk returning combat veterans.
Primary Author and Speaker: Isabelle Wandenkolk
Additional Authors and Speakers: Sherrilene Classen
Contributing Authors: Abraham Yarney, Mary Jeghers, Sandra Winter, Justin Mason
Motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) are a leading cause of death for returning combat Veterans. Driving simulators are an effective modality to assess fitness-to-drive; however, no studies exist on simulated driving interventions to improve Veterans’ real-world driving. This study assessed the effectiveness of an occupational therapy driving intervention (OT-DI) versus a traffic safety intervention (TSE) on driving simulator errors and real-world events (i.e., traffic violations and MVCs) among returning combat Veterans. Returning combat Veterans from Operations Enduring Freedom, Iraqi Freedom and/or New Dawn with deployed-related polytrauma conditions (≥2 combat injuries) who reported driving traffic offenses and/or driving anxiety were allocated to receive the OT-DI or TSE via a randomized controlled clinical trial. In the OT-DI arm (n = 23), an occupational therapist driver rehabilitation specialist identified driving errors in a high-fidelity driving simulator and provided tailored-strategies to mitigate these errors. The TSE arm (n = 19) consisted of a Florida Basic Driver Improvement Course covering vehicle safety, traffic laws, and crash prevention. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to quantify between-group differences in simulated driving errors at baseline and post-intervention, and compare Veterans’ real-world events before baseline and post-intervention. Veterans in the OT-DI group vs. TSE had fewer over-speeding errors (p <.001) and total number of driving errors (p = .002), post-intervention. Descriptively, both interventions reduced the frequency of violations (OT-DI 23%; TSE 46% decrease), speeding violations (OT-DI 9%; TSE 26% decrease), and crashes (OT-DI 25%; TSE 50% decrease). Both groups had a reduction in driving simulator errors and real-world driving events post-intervention. These findings help inform clinicians to identify driving interventions to reduce real-world driving violations and crashes for at-risk returning combat Veterans.
Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center. (2013). Motor vehicle-related deaths, active and reserve components, U.S. Armed Forces 1999-2012. Medical Surveillance Monthly Report, 20(11), 10.
Amick, M. M., Kraft, M., & McGlinchey, R. (2013). Driving simulator performance of Veterans from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 50(4), 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1682/jrrd.2012.06.0108
Classen, S., Winter, S., Monahan, M., Yarney, A., Link Lutz, A., Platek, K., & Levy, C. (2017). Driving intervention for returning combat Veterans: Interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial. OTJR: Occupation, Participation, and Health, 37(2), 62–71. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1177/1539449216675582
Bullman, T. A., Kang, H. K., Smolenski, D. J., Skopp, N. A., Gahm, G. A., & Reger, M. A. (2017). Risk of motor vehicle accident death among 1.3 million veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Traffic Injury Prevention, 18(4), 369–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2016.1206201