MurphySLXuJQKochanekKD.
Deaths: Final data for 2010. National vital statistics
reports; Vol. 61, No. 4.
Hyattsville, MD: National
Center for Health Statistics; 2013. Available
at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr61/nvsr61_04.pdf. Accessed
October 11, 2015.
2.
O'DonnellMP.
Publisher's notes. Am J Health
Promot.
1989;3:4.
NelsonCFVeroffD.
Chapter 8: Value on investment framework. In:
Program Measurement and Evaluation Guide: Core Metrics for Employee
Health Management. Health Enhancement Research
Organization (HERO) and Population Health Alliance (PHA);
2015. Available at: http://hero-health.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/HERO-PHA-Metrics-Guide-FINAL.pdf.
Accessed April 10, 2015.
5.
O'DonnellMP.
What is the ROAR factor for your health promotion program:
(hint: We used to call it ROI). Am J Health
Promot.
2015;30:v–vii.
6.
O'DonnellMP.
Evaluating your health promotion program for the return on
allocated resources (ROAR) factor. Am J Health
Promot.
2015;30:v–viii.
BruggeD.
Community research in environmental health: Studies in
science, advocacy and ethics. Health Promot J
Austr.
2006;17:268.
11.
CooksonRDrummondMWeatherlyH.
Explicit incorporation of equity considerations into economic
evaluation of public health interventions. Health
Econ Policy Law.
2009;4:231–245.
12.
StasonW.
Measuring the “payoff” of worksite health
strategies. Bus Health.
1984;1:19.
13.
StokolsD.
Establishing and maintaining healthy environments: Toward a
social ecology of health promotion. Am
Psychol.
1992;47:6.
14.
CraigPDieppePMacintyreS.
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new
Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ.
2008;337:a1655.
15.
Australian Bureau of
Statistics. Regional Wage and Salary
Earner Statistics (Cat. No. 5673.0.55.003).
Canberra, ACT:
ABS; 2008.
16.
WHOQOL
group. The World Health
Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the
World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med.1995;41:1403–1409.
17.
BrazierJERobertsJ.
The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from
the SF-12. Med Care.
2004;42:851–859.
18.
BaxterSSandersonKVennA.
Construct validity of SF-6D health state utility values in an
employed population. Qual Life Res.2015;24:851–870.
19.
TerryPEGrossmeierJHudsmithN.
The Art of Health Promotion: The value issue.
Am J Health Promot.
2015;29:TAHP1–TAHP12.
20.
SmithBJTangKCNutbeamD.
WHO Health Promotion Glossary: New terms.
Health Promot Int.2006;21:340–345.
WeinerBJLewisMALinnanLA.
Using organization theory to understand the determinants of
effective implementation of worksite health promotion
programs. Health Educ Res.2009;24:292–305.
van
DongenJMvan WierMFTompaE.
Trial-based economic evaluations in occupational health:
Principles, methods, and recommendations. J Occup
Environ Med.2014;56:563–572.
25.
O'DonnellMP.
Health Promotion in the Workplace. 4th
ed.Troy, Mich: American Journal of
Health Promotion; 2015.
26.
Department of Health
and Human Services TSG. Healthy
Workplace Resource Toolkit. Available at: www.tas.gov.au. Accessed November 26,
2014.
Center for Disease
Control and Prevention. The CDC Worksite
Health ScoreCare: An Assessment Tool for Employers to Prevent Heart Disease,
Stroke, and Related Health Conditions. Atlanta,
Ga: US Dept of Health and Human
Services; 2012. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/dhdsp/pubs/worksite_scorecard.htm. Accessed
April 3, 2015.
31.
OldenburgBSallisJFHarrisDOwenN.
Checklist of Health Promotion Environments at Worksites
(CHEW): Development and measurement characteristics.
Am J Health Promot.
2002;16:288–299.
32.
DeJoyDMWilsonMGGoetzelRZ.
Development of the Environmental Assessment Tool (EAT) to
measure organizational physical and social support for worksite obesity
prevention programs. J Occup Environ Med.2008;50:126.
33.
GolaszewskiTBarrDPronkN.
Development of assessment tools to measure organizational
support for employee health. Am J Health
Behav.
2003;27:43–54.
34.
WhitelawSBaxendaleABryceC.
‘Settings’ based health promotion: A review.
Health Promot Int.2001;16:339–353.
35.
BaxterSSandersonKVennAJ.
The relationship between return on investment and quality of
study methodology in workplace health promotion programs.
Am J Health Promot.
2014;28:347–363.
36.
WeinsteinMCSiegelJEGoldMR.
Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health
and Medicine. JAMA.
1996;276:1253–1258.
37.
McIntoshEClarkePFrewELouviereJ.
Applied Methods of Cost-Benefit Analysis in Health Care.
Vol 4. Oxford, UK:
Oxford University Press;
2010.
38.
RoseG.
Sick individuals and sick populations.
Int J Epidemiol.
1985;14:32–38.
MdegeNDManM-STaylorCATorgersonDJ.
Systematic review of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials
shows that design is particularly used to evaluate interventions during
routine implementation. J Clin Epidemiol.
2011;64:936–948.
41.
BrownCALilfordRJ.
The stepped wedge trial design: A systematic
review. BMC Med Res Methodol.
2006;6:54.
TerryPE.
The Art of Health Promotion: The game changers issue. Profile
of Lawrence Green. Am J Health Promot.
2015;30:TAHP1–TAHP3.
48.
AldrichRM.
A review and critique of well-being in occupational therapy
and occupational science. Scand J Occup
Ther.2010;8:93–100.
49.
Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC). Well-being
concepts. Health-Related Quality of Life
(HRQOL). Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/hrqol/wellbeing.htm. Accessed November 9,
2015.
GoetzelRZHenkeRMTabriziM.
Do workplace health promotion (wellness) programs
work?J Occup Environ Med.2014;56:927–934.
52.
HamarBCoberleyCPopeJERulaEY.
Well-being improvement in a midsize employer: Changes in
well-being, productivity, health risk, and perceived employer support after
implementation of a well-being improvement strategy.
J Occup Environ Med.2015;57:367–373.
53.
GandyWMCoberleyCPopeJERulaEY.
Well-being and employee health—how employees' well-being
scores interact with demographic factors to influence risk of
hospitalization or an emergency room visit. Popul
Health Manag.
2014;17:13–20.
