This article briefly describes how to structure a program evaluation to embrace the ROAR Factor. ROAR stands for return on allocated resources, which implies that we need to measure ALL the allocated resources, not just direct out-of-pocket costs, and ALL the returns, not just reductions in medical costs or similar objective outcomes. The ROAR Factor also means focusing programs on what makes people feel great, what makes them want to roar, and measuring how well we are doing in helping people feel great.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
O'DonnellMP. What is the ROAR Factor for your health promotion program? (Hint: We used to call it ROI.)Am J Health Promot. 2015;30:v–vii. Available at: http://ajhpcontents.org/doi/10.4278/ajhp.30.01.v. Accessed September 26, 2015.
BaxterSSandersonKVennAJ. The relationship between return on investment and quality of study methodology in workplace health promotion programs. Am J Health Promot. 2014;28:347–363.
4.
BaickerKCutlerDSongZ. Workplace wellness programs can generate savings. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29:304–311.
5.
PrasadMWahlqvistPShikiarRShihYC. A review of self-report instruments measuring health-related work productivity: A patient-reported outcomes perspective. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22:225–244. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14974873. Accessed September 15, 2015.
6.
TengsTAdamsMEPliskinJS. Five-hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness. Risk Anal.1995;15:369–390. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7604170. Accessed September 15, 2015.
