McLeroyKRBibeauDStecklerAGlanzK. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q.1988;15:351–377.
3.
StokolsD. Establishing and maintaining healthy environments. Toward a social ecology of health promotion. Am Psychol. 1992;47:6–22.
4.
KingACBlairSNBildDE. Determinants of physical activity and interventions in adults. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 1992;24:S221–S236.
5.
DishmanRKSallisJF. Determinants and interventions for physical activity and exercise. In: BouchardCShephardRJStephensT, eds. Physical Activity, Fitness, and Health: International Proceedings and Consensus Statement. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics; 1994:214–238.
6.
SallisJFHovellMFHofstetterCR. Distance between homes and exercise facilities related to the frequency of exercise among San Diego residents. Public Health Rep.1990;105:179–185.
7.
TropedPJWilsonJSMatthewsCE. The built environment and location-based physical activity. Am J Prev Med.2010;38:429–438
8.
CumminsS. Commentary: Investigating neighborhood effects on health—avoiding the “local trap.”Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36:355–357.
9.
BarrosoCSKelderSHSpringerA. Senate Bill 42: Implementation and impact on physical activity in middle schools. J Adolesc Health. 2009;45:S82–S90.
10.
KelderSHSpringerABarrosoCS. Implementation of Texas Senate Bill 19 to increase physical activity in elementary schools. J Public Health Policy. 2009;30:S221–S247.
11.
BrownellKDKershRLudwigDS. Personal responsibility and obesity: A constructive approach to a controversial issue. Health Aff.2010;29:379–387.
12.
RuffinJ. The science of eliminating health disparities: Embracing a new paradigm. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:S8–S9.