We assessed factors associated with tobacco vendor compliance with India’s Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA) provisions regulating tobacco sales and point-of-sale (POS) environments.
Design:
Study design was a cross-sectional random sample of tobacco vendors in Mumbai, India (2010).
Setting:
School-adjacent neighborhoods were the study setting.
Subjects:
Study subjects were tobacco vendors (n = 436).
Measures:
Face-to-face interviews, and audits of POS environments were used to assess compliance.
Analysis:
Factors associated with compliance were identified using logistic regression.
Results:
About 4% of vendors were fully compliant. Although 80% reported compliance with the ban on tobacco sales to minors, only 10% displayed signage about the ban. About 84% were compliant with the two–tobacco advertisement limit; of those displaying advertisements, 67% were compliant with size limits, 68% with content restrictions, and 8% with health warning requirements. Knowledge about fines for noncompliance was associated with compliance with the ban on sales to minors (odds ratio [OR], 2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26, 3.56) and signage requirement (OR, 4.42; 95% CI, 1.76, 11.13). Greater compliance with the two-advertisement limit was associated with higher store income from tobacco (OR, .26; 95% CI, .09, .73) and lower neighborhood socioeconomic status (p < .01); the latter was associated with advertisement size limits compliance (p < .05).
Conclusions:
Compliance with COTPA provisions was low. Interventions modifying vendor knowledge about provisions and fines may increase compliance, and they should target stores that are reliant on tobacco sales.
GajalakshmiCJhaPRansonK. Global patterns of smoking and smoking-attributable mortality. In: JhaPChaloupkaF, eds. Tobacco Control in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: Oxford University Press; 2000:9–39.
2.
World Health Organization. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2008–The MPOWER Package. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2008. Available at: http://www.who.int/tobacco/mpower/2008/en/. Accessed October 7, 2013.
JhaPJacobBGajalakshmiV. A nationally representative case-control study of smoking and death in India. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1137–1147.
6.
Ministry of Law and Justice. COTPA: Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply, and Distribution) Act, 2003. New Delhi, India: Government of India Press; 2003. Available at: http://www.who.int/fctc/reporting/Annexthreeindia.pdf.
PaynterJEdwardsR. The impact of tobacco promotion at the point of sale: a systematic review. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009;11:25–35.
9.
HenriksenLSchleicherNCFeigheryECFortmannSP. A longitudinal study of exposure to retail cigarette advertising and smoking initiation. Pediatrics. 2010;126:232–238.
10.
WakefieldMAGermainDDurkinSJ. How does increasingly plainer cigarette packaging influence adult smokers’ perceptions about brand image?: an experimental study. Tob Control. 2008;17:416–421.
11.
McNeillALewisSQuinnC. Evaluation of the removal of point-of-sale tobacco displays in Ireland. Tob Control. 2011;20:137–143.
12.
ScheffelsJLavikR. Out of sight, out of mind?: removal of point-of-sale tobacco displays in Norway. Tob Control. 2013;22(e1): e37–e42.
13.
SalloumRGNakkashRTMyersAE. Point-of-sale tobacco advertising in Beirut, Lebanon following a national advertising ban. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:534.
14.
LetcherTCameronMInglisGWakefieldM. Bans on tobacco advertising at point of sale. In: Quit Victoria Research and Evaluation Studies No. 11: 2000-2001. Melbourne, Australia: Quit Victoria; 2002:85–112. Available at: http://www.quit.org.au/downloads/QE/QE11/Chapter7.pdf. Accessed September 12, 2014.
15.
QuedleyMNgBSapreN. In sight, in mind: retailer compliance with legislation on limiting retail tobacco displays. Nicotine Tob Res. 2008;10:1347–1354.
16.
Hernández-ÁvilaJETirado-RamírezESantos-LunaRReynales-ShigematsuLM. Use of Geographical Information Systems for billboards and points-of-sale surveillance in two Mexico cities. Salud Publica Mex. 2007;49(suppl 2): S241–S246.
17.
FrickRGKleinEGFerketichAKWewersME. Tobacco advertising and sales practices in licensed retail outlets after the Food and Drug Administration regulations. J Community Health. 2012;37:963–967.
18.
KleinEGFerketichAKAbdel-RasoulM. Smokeless tobacco marketing and sales practices in Appalachian Ohio following federal regulations. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012;14:880–884.
19.
ChaudhrySChaudhryK. Point of sale tobacco advertisements in India. Indian J Cancer. 2007;44:131–136.
20.
SchensulJJNairSBilgiS. Availability, accessibility and promotion of smokeless tobacco in a low-income area of Mumbai. Tob Control. 2013;22:324–330.
21.
MistryRPednekarMPimpleS. Banning tobacco sales and advertisements near educational institutions may reduce students’ tobacco use risk: evidence from Mumbai, India. Tob Control. 2015;24:e100–e107.
22.
ElfJLModiBStillmanF. Tobacco sales and marketing within 100 yards of schools in Ahmedabad City, India. Public Health. 2013;127:442–448.
23.
AghiMOswalKPednekarM. Pictorial warnings on tobacco products at the point of sale in India. Tob Control. 2012;21:450–451.
24.
PatelSRendellHMaudgalSOswalK. Tobacco industry tactics with advertisements at the point of sale in Mumbai. Indian J Cancer. 2013;50:245–249.
25.
RoseSWMyersAED’AngeloHRibislKM. Retailer adherence to Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, North Carolina, 2011. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E47.
26.
SteadLFLancasterT. Interventions for preventing tobacco sales to minors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;1:CD001497.
27.
DiFranzaJRCelebuckiCCMoweryPD. Measuring statewide merchant compliance with tobacco minimum age laws: the Massachusetts experience. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:1124–1125.
28.
DovellRAMowatDLDorlandJLamM. Changes among retailers selling cigarettes to minors. Can J Public Health. 1996;87:66–68.
29.
PearsonDCSongLValdezRBAnguloAS. Youth tobacco sales in a metropolitan county: factors associated with compliance. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33:91–97.
30.
SeidenbergABCaugheyRWReesVWConnollyGN. Storefront cigarette advertising differs by community demographic profile. Am J Health Promot. 2010;24:1–12.
31.
LawsMWhitmanJ. Tobacco availability and point of sale marketing in demographically contrasting districts of Massachusetts. Tob Control. 2002;11(suppl 2): ii71–ii73.
32.
AltmanDGWheelisAYMcFarlaneM. The relationship between tobacco access and use among adolescents: a four community study. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:759–775.
33.
JohnRCheneyMAzadM. Point-of-sale marketing of tobacco products: taking advantage of the socially disadvantaged?J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009;20:489–506.
34.
JasonLABillowsWDSchnopp-WyattDLKingC. Long-term findings from Woodridge in reducing illegal cigarette sales to older minors. Eval Health Prof. 1996;19:3–13.
35.
LandrineHKlonoffEAFritzJM. Preventing cigarette sales to minors: the need for contextual, sociocultural analysis. Prev Med. 1994;23:322–327.
36.
ForsterJLMurrayDMWolfsonM. The effects of community policies to reduce youth access to tobacco. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:1193–1198.
37.
PandaBRoutAPatiS. Tobacco control law enforcement and compliance in Odisha, India–implications for tobacco control policy and practice. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13:4631–4637.
