This review synthesizes the published literature on using mass media campaigns to reduce youth tobacco use, with particular focus on effects within population subgroups and the relative effectiveness of campaign characteristics.
Data Source.
A search of PubMed and PsycINFO conducted in March of 2014 yielded 397 studies with 34 suitable for inclusion.
Study Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria.
Included were quantitative studies that evaluate an antitobacco media campaign intended to influence youth cognitions or behavior or explore the relative effectiveness of campaign characteristics among youth.
Data Extraction.
An automated search and assessment of suitability for inclusion was done.
Data Synthesis.
Study outcomes were compared and synthesized.
Results.
Antitobacco media campaigns can be effective across racial/ethnic populations, although the size of the campaign effect may differ by race/ethnicity. Evidence is insufficient to determine whether campaign outcomes differ by socioeconomic status (SES) and population density. Youth are more likely to recall and think about advertising that includes personal testimonials; a surprising narrative; and intense images, sound, and editing. Evidence in support of using a health consequences message theme is mixed; an industry manipulation theme may be effective in combination with a health consequences message. Research is insufficient to determine whether advertising with a secondhand smoke or social norms theme influences youth tobacco use.
Conclusion.
Our recommendation is to develop antitobacco campaigns designed to reach all at-risk youth, which can be effective across racial/ethnic populations. Research priorities include assessing campaign influence among lower SES and rural youth, disentangling the effects of message characteristics, and assessing the degree to which this body of evidence may have changed as a result of changes in youth culture and communication technology.
Terry-McElrathYMWakefieldMAEmeryS. State anti-tobacco advertising and smoking outcomes by gender and race/ethnicity. Ethn Health. 2007;12:339–362.
2.
BauerUEJohnsonTMHopkinsRSBrooksRG. Changes in youth cigarette use and intentions following implementation of a tobacco control program: Findings from the Florida Youth Tobacco Survey, 1998–2000. JAMA. 2000;284:723–728.
3.
NiederdeppeJFarrellyMCHavilandML. Confirming “truth”: More evidence of a successful tobacco countermarketing campaign in Florida. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:255–257.
4.
BienerL. Adult and youth response to the Massachusetts anti-tobacco television campaign. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2000;6:40–44.
5.
WhiteVMWarneCDSpittalMJ. What impact have tobacco control policies, cigarette price and tobacco control programme funding had on Australian adolescents' smoking? Findings over a 15-year period. Addiction. 2011;106:1493–1502.
6.
FarrellyMCDavisKCHavilandML. Evidence of a dose-response relationship between “truth” antismoking ads and youth smoking prevalence. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:425–431.
7.
SlyDFHopkinsRSTrapidoERayS. Influence of a counteradvertising media campaign on initiation of smoking: The Florida “truth” campaign. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:233–238.
8.
ChenXLiGUngerJB. Secular trends in adolescent never smoking from 1990 to 1999 in California: An age-period-cohort analysis. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:2099–2104.
9.
GilpinEAEmerySLFarkasAJ. The California Tobacco Control Program: A Decade of Progress, Results from the California Tobacco Surveys, 1990–1998. La Jolla, Calif: University of California, San Diego; 2001.
10.
RoeselerABurnsD. The quarter that changed the world. Tob Control. 2010;19(suppl 1):i3–i15.
11.
FarrellyMCNonnemakerJDavisKCHussinA. The influence of the national truth campaign on smoking initiation. Am J Prev Med.2009;36:379–384.
12.
WilsonLMTangAvila EChanderG. Impact of tobacco control interventions on smoking initiation, cessation, and prevalence: A systematic review. J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:961724.
13.
WeissJWCenSSchusterDV. Longitudinal effects of pro-tobacco and anti-tobacco messages on adolescent smoking susceptibility. Nicotine Tob Res.2006;8:455–465.
14.
SiegelMBienerL. The impact of an antismoking media campaign on progression to established smoking: Results of a longitudinal youth study. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:380–386.
15.
National Cancer Institute. The Role of the Media in Promoting and Reducing Tobacco Use. Tobacco Control Monograph No. 19. Bethesda, Md: US Dept of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 2008.
16.
FarrellyMNiederdeppeJYarsevichJ. Youth tobacco prevention mass media campaigns: Past, present, and future directions. Tob Control. 2003;12(suppl 1):i35–i47.
17.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs—2007. Atlanta, Ga: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2007.
18.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs—2014. Atlanta, Ga: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2014.
19.
HoltgraveDRWunderinkKAValloneDMHealtonCG. Cost-utility analysis of the National truth campaign to prevent youth smoking. Am J Prev Med.2009;36:385–388.
20.
Secker-WalkerRHWordenJKHollandRR. A mass media programme to prevent smoking among adolescents: Costs and cost effectiveness. Tob Control. 1997;6:207–212.
21.
FishmanPAEbelBEGarrisonMM. Cigarette tax increase and media campaign cost of reducing smoking-related deaths. Am J Prev Med.2005;29:19–26.
22.
Institute of Medicine. Ending the Tobacco Problem: A Blueprint for the Nation. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, Institute of Medicine of the National Academies; 2007.
23.
ScharEGutierrezKMurphy-HoeferRNelsonDE. Tobacco Use Prevention Media Campaigns: Lessons Learned from Youth in Nine Countries. Atlanta, Ga: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2006.
24.
WakefieldMALokenBHornikRC. Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour. Lancet. 2010;376:1261–1271.
25.
BrinnMPCarsonKVEstermanAJ. Mass media interventions for preventing smoking in young people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.2011;11:CD001006.
26.
BienerLJiMGilpinEAAlbersAB. The impact of emotional tone, message, and broadcast parameters in youth anti-smoking advertisements. J Health Commun. 2004;9:259–274.
27.
BienerL. Anti-tobacco advertisements by Massachusetts and Philip Morris: What teenagers think. Tob Control. 2002;11(suppl 2):ii43–ii46.
28.
CowellAJFarrellyMCChouRValloneDM. Assessing the impact of the national “truth” antismoking campaign on beliefs, attitudes, and intent to smoke by race/ethnicity. Ethn Health. 2009;14:75–91.
29.
DavisKCFarrellyMCMesseriPDukeJ. The impact of national smoking prevention campaigns on tobacco-related beliefs, intentions to smoke and smoking initiation: Results from a longitudinal survey of youth in the United States. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009;6:722–740.
30.
DukeJCValloneDMAllenJA. Increasing youths' exposure to a tobacco prevention media campaign in rural and low-population-density communities. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:2210–2216.
31.
FarrellyMCDavisKCYarsevichJ. Getting to the Truth: Assessing Youths' Reactions to the Truth® and “Think. Don't Smoke” Tobacco Countermarketing Campaigns. First Look Report 9. Washington, DC: American Legacy Foundation; 2002.
32.
FarrellyMCDavisKCDukeJMesseriP. Sustaining “truth”: Changes in youth tobacco attitudes and smoking intentions after 3 years of a national antismoking campaign. Health Educ Res.2009;24:42–48.
33.
FlynnBSWordenJKBunnJY. Mass media interventions to reduce youth smoking prevalence. Am J Prev Med.2010;39:53–62.
34.
HafstadAAaroLEEngelandA. Provocative appeals in anti-smoking mass media campaigns targeting adolescents—the accumulated effect of multiple exposures. Health Educ Res.1997;12:227–236.
35.
KandraKLMcCulloughASummerlin-LongS. The evaluation of North Carolina's state-sponsored youth tobacco prevention media campaign. Health Educ Res.2013;28:1–14.
36.
KellyKJStanleyLRComelloMLGonzalezGR. Tobacco counteradvertisements aimed at bicultural Mexican American youth: The impact of language and theme. J Health Commun. 2006;11:455–476.
37.
NiederdeppeJ. Syntactic indeterminacy, perceived message sensation value-enhancing features, and message processing in the context of anti-tobacco advertisements. Communication Monographs. 2005;72:324–344.
38.
NiederdeppeJDavisKCFarrellyMCYarsevichJ. Stylistic features, need for sensation, and confirmed recall of national smoking prevention advertisements. Journal of Communication. 2007:272–292.
39.
PechmannCReiblingET. Antismoking advertisements for youths: An independent evaluation of health, counter-industry, and industry approaches. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:906–913.
40.
PechmannCZhaoGGoldbergMEReiblingET. What to Convey in antismoking advertisements for adolescents: The use of protection motivation theory to identify effective message themes. J Marketing. 2003;67:1–18.
41.
SlyDFHealdGRRayS. The Florida “truth” anti-tobacco media evaluation: Design, first year results, and implications for planning future state media evaluations. Tob Control. 2001;10:9–15.
42.
SutfinELSzykmanLRMooreMC. Adolescents' responses to anti-tobacco advertising: Exploring the role of adolescents' smoking status and advertisement theme. J Health Commun. 2008;13:480–500.
43.
Terry-McElrathYWakefieldMRuelE. The effect of antismoking advertisement executional characteristics on youth comprehension, appraisal, recall, and engagement. J Health Commun. 2005;10:127–143.
44.
UusitaloONiemelä-NyrhinenJ. Exploring message themes in antismoking advertising targeted at teenagers. Young Consumers. 2008;9:29–36.
45.
ValloneDMAllenJAXiaoH. Is socioeconomic status associated with awareness of and receptivity to the truth campaign?Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009;104 (suppl 1):S115–S120.
46.
VardavasCISymvoulakisEKConnollyGN. What defines an effective anti-tobacco TV advertisement? A pilot study among Greek adolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010;7:78–88.
47.
Vogeltanz-HolmNHolmJEPlumeWhite JPoltavskiD. Confirmed recall and perceived effectiveness of tobacco countermarketing media in rural youth. Prev Sci.2009;10:325–334.
48.
WakefieldMDurrantRTerry-McElrathY. Appraisal of anti-smoking advertising by youth at risk for regular smoking: A comparative study in the United States, Australia, and Britain. Tob Control. 2003;12(suppl 2):ii82–ii86.
49.
WakefieldMBalchGIRuelE. Youth responses to anti-smoking advertisements from tobacco-control agencies, tobacco companies, and pharmaceutical companies. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2005;35:1894–1911.
50.
WhiteVTanNWakefieldMHillD. Do adult focused anti-smoking campaigns have an impact on adolescents? The case of the Australian National Tobacco Campaign. Tob Control. 2003;12(suppl 2):ii23–ii29.
51.
WordenJKFlynnBSSolomonLJ. Using mass media to prevent cigarette smoking among adolescent girls. Health Educ Q.1996;23:453–468.
52.
ZollingerTWSaywellRMJrOvergaardAD. Antitobacco media awareness of rural youth compared to suburban and urban youth in Indiana. J Rural Health. 2006;22:119–123.
53.
US Dept of Health and Human Services. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, Ga: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2012.
54.
FarrellyMCHealtonCGDavisKC. Getting to the truth: Evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:901–907.
55.
ChassinLPressonCCShermanSJ. Predicting the onset of cigarette smoking in adolescents: A longitudinal study. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1984;14:224–243.
56.
PressonCCChassinLShermanSJ. Predictors of adolescents' intentions to smoke: Age, sex, race, and regional differences. Int J Addict. 1984;19:503–519.
57.
PierceJPEmerySGilpinEA. The California Tobacco Control Program: A long-term health communication project. In: HornikRC, ed. Public Health Communication: Evidence for Behavior Change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2002:97–114.
