The aims of the current study were to (1) determine the association between personal income and body mass index (BMI) and between individual education and BMI, and (2) examine the association between education and BMI across strata of personal income among women.
Design.
The design of the study was a quantitative analysis of data from self-report questionnaires.
Setting.
The study setting was socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods in Victoria, Australia.
Subjects.
The study included 4065 nonpregnant women (ages 18–45 years) living in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas.
Measures.
The study used a self report questionnaire measuring sociodemographic characteristics known to be associated with BMI.
Analysis.
Multiple linear regressions with imputation were used to assess the association between education level, personal income, and BMI, while controlling for covariates.
Results.
Mean (SD) observed BMI was 26.0 (6.1) kg/m2. Compared with women with low education, women with medium (b = −0.81; 95% confidence interval, −1.30 to −0.27; p = .004) and high (b = −1.71; 95% confidence interval, −2.34 to −1.09; p < .001) education had statistically significantly lower BMI values. No differences in BMI were observed between income categories. Stratified analyses suggested that the education-BMI association may be stronger in low-income than higher-income women.
Conclusion.
Our data show that among women living in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas, high education level rather than personal income may be protective against overweight/obesity. High personal income, however, may buffer the effects of low education on BMI. Obesity prevention efforts should target women with amplified disadvantage.
McLarenL.Socioeconomic status and obesity. Epidemiol Rev.2007;29:29–48.
2.
SobalJStunkardAJ. Socioeconomic status and obesity: A review of the literature. Psychol Bull.1989;105:260–275.
3.
BallKCrawfordD. Socioeconomic status and weight change in adults: A review. Soc Sci Med.2005;60:1987–2010.
4.
HarringtonDWElliottSJ. Weighing the importance of neighbourhood: A multilevel exploration of the determinants of overweight and obesity. Soc Sci Med.2009;68:593–600.
5.
MacFarlaneAAbbottGCrawfordDBallK. Sociodemographic and behavioural correlates of weight status among women with children living in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods. Int J Obes (Lond). 2009;33:1289–1298.
6.
GrothMVFagtSStockmarrA. Dimensions of socioeconomic position related to body mass index and obesity among Danish women and men. Scand J Public Health. 2009;37:418–426.
7.
LindstromMHansonBSWirfaltEOstergrenPO. Socioeconomic differences in the consumption of vegetables, fruit and fruit juices. The influence of psychosocial factors. Eur J Public Health. 2001;11:51–59.
8.
GiskesKvan LentheFJTurrellG. Socioeconomic position at different stages of the life course and its influence on body weight and weight gain in adulthood: A longitudinal study with 13-year follow-up. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008;16:1377–1381.
9.
MorleyBCScullyMLNivenPH. What factors are associated with excess body weight in Australian secondary school students?Med J Aust.2012;196:189–192.
10.
DinsaGDGoryakinYFumagalliESuhrckeM. Obesity and socioeconomic status in developing countries: A systematic review. Obes Rev.2012;13:1067–1079.
11.
ShiL. Sociodemographic characteristics and individual health behaviors. South Med J.1998;91:933–941.
12.
DobsonAPorteousJMcElduffPAlexanderH. Whose diet has changed?Aust N Z J Public Health. 1997;21:147–154.
13.
TurrellGHewittBPattersonCOldenburgB. Measuring socio-economic position in dietary research: Is choice of socio-economic indicator important?Public Health Nutr.2003;6:191–200.
14.
SmithPFrankJ. When aspirations and achievements don't meet. A longitudinal examination of the differential effect of education and occupational attainment on declines in self-rated health among Canadian labour force participants. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:827–834.
15.
KingTKavanaghAMJolleyD. Weight and place: A multilevel cross-sectional survey of area-level social disadvantage and overweight/obesity in Australia. Int J Obes (Lond). 2006;30:281–287.
16.
van LentheFJMackenbachJP. Neighbourhood deprivation and overweight: The GLOBE study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002;26:234–240.
17.
ClelandVBallKHumeC. Individual social and environmental correlates of physical activity among women living in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods. Soc Sci Med.2010;70:2011–2018.
18.
MacFarlaneAAbbottGCrawfordDBallK. Personal, social and environmental correlates of healthy weight status amongst mothers from socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods: Findings from the READI study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:23.
19.
ClelandVHumeCCrawfordD. Urban-rural comparison of weight status among women and children living in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods. Med J Aust.2010;192:137–140.
20.
Australian Bureau of Statistics.National nutrition survey user's guide 1995. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 1998.
21.
BallKCrawfordDIrelandPHodgeA. Patterns and demographic predictors of 5-year weight change in a multi-ethnic cohort of men and women in Australia. Public Health Nutr.2003;6:269–281.
22.
WilliamsonDFKahnHSRemingtonPLAndaRF. The 10-year incidence of overweight and major weight gain in US adults. Arch Intern Med.1990;150:665–672.
23.
LeeCDobsonAJBrownWJ. Cohort Profile: The Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:987–991.
24.
TurrellG. Income non-reporting: Implications for health inequalities research. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000;54:207–214.
25.
CrawfordDJefferyRBallKBrugJ. The role of socio-cultural factors in the obesity epidemic. In: CrawfordDJefferyRWBallKBrugJ, eds. Obesity Epidemiology: From Aetiology to Public Health. 2nd ed.New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2010:105–118.
26.
Lahti-KoskiMPietinenPHeliövaaraMVartiainenE. Associations of body mass index and obesity with physical activity, food choices, alcohol intake, and smoking in the 1982–1997 FINRISK Studies. Am J Clin Nutr.2002;75:809–817.
27.
KenwardMGCarpenterJR. Multiple imputation: Current perspectives. Stat Methods Med Res.2007;16:199–218.
28.
BarclaySToddCFinlayI. Not another questionnaire! Maximizing the response rate, predicting non-response and assessing non-response bias in postal questionnaire studies of GPs. Fam Pract. 2002;19:105–111.
29.
RubinDB. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York, NY: Wiley; 1987.
30.
LiublinskaVRubinDB. Re: “dealing with missing outcome data in randomized trials and observational studies.”Am J Epidemiol. 2012;176:357–358.
31.
BostonRCSumnerAE. STATA: A statistical analysis system for examining biomedical data. Adv Exp Med Biol.2003;537:353–369.
32.
DrewnowskiA. The cost of US foods as related to their nutritive value. Am J Clin Nutr.2010;92:1181–1188.
33.
LarsonNIStoryMTNelsonMC. Neighborhood environments: Disparities in access to healthy foods in the U.S.Am J Prev Med.2009;36:74–81.
34.
BallKTimperioACrawfordD. Neighbourhood socioeconomic inequalities in food access and affordability. Health Place. 2009;15:578–585.
35.
CrawfordDTimperioAGiles-CortiB. Do features of public open spaces vary according to neighbourhood socioeconomic status?Health Place. 2008;14:889–893.
36.
GalobardesBShawMLawlorDA. Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60:7–12.
37.
KriegerNWilliamsDRMossNE. Measuring social class in US public health research: Concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health. 1997;18:341–378.
38.
BurtonNWBrownWDobsonA. Accuracy of body mass index estimated from self-reported height and weight in mid-aged Australian women. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2010;34:620–623.
