To understand how social and structural contexts shape individual risk, vulnerability, and interconception health-related behaviors of African-American women.
Approach or Design.
A longitudinal ethnographic study was conducted.
Setting.
The study was conducted in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Participants.
The sample included 19 African-American women who were participants in the intervention group of a randomized clinical trial of interconceptional care.
Method.
Data were collected through interaction with participants over a period of 6 to 12 months. Participant observation, structured and unstructured interviews, and Photovoice were used to obtain data; grounded theory was used for analysis. The analysis was guided by intersectional theory.
Results.
Social disadvantage influenced health and health care–seeking behaviors of African-American women, and the disadvantage centered on the experience of racism. The authors identify seven experiences grounded in the interactions among the forces of racism, class, gender, and history that may influence women's participation in and the effectiveness of preconception and interconception health care.
Conclusion.
African-American women's health and wellness behaviors are influenced by an experience of racism structurally embedded and made more virulent by its intersection with class, gender, and history. These intersecting forces create what may be a unique exposure that contributes significantly to the proximal determinants of health inequities for African-American women. Health promotion approaches that focus on the individual as the locus of intervention must concomitantly unravel and address the intertwining structural forces that shape individual circumstance in order to improve women's interconceptional health and to reduce disparities.
MartinJAHamiltonBESuttonPD. Births: Final data for 2007. Natl Vital Stat Rep.2010;58(24):1–85.
3.
MattisonDRDamusKFioreE. Preterm delivery: A public health perspective. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001;15(suppl 2):7–16.
4.
RowleyDL. Closing the gap, opening the process: Why study social contributors to preterm delivery among black women. Matern Child Health J.2001;5:71–74.
PeckMGSappenfieldWMSkalaJ. Perinatal periods of risk: A community approach for using data to improve women and infants' health. Matern Child Health J.2010;14:864–874. doi:10.1007/s10995-010-0626-3.
7.
CaiJJ. Perinatal periods of risk: Analysis of fetal–infant mortality rates in Kansas City, Missouri. Matern Child Health J.2005;9:199–205.
8.
PestronkRM. A partnership to reduce African-American infant mortality in Genesee County, Michigan. Public Health Rep.2003;118:324.
9.
JohnsonKPosnerSFBiermannJ. Recommendations to improve preconception health and health care—United States. A report of the CDC/ATSDR Preconception Care Work Group and the Select Panel on Preconception Care. MMWR Recomm Rep.2006;55(RR-6):1–23.
10.
PrueCEDanielKL. Social marketing: Planning before conceiving preconception care. Matern Child Health J.2006;10(5 suppl):S79–S84. doi:10.1007/s10995-006-0105-z.
11.
EvansWDMcCormackL. Applying social marketing in health care: Communicating evidence to change consumer behavior. Med Decis Making. 2008;28:781–792. doi:10.1177/0272989X08318464.
12.
Frameworks Institute. Differences between strategic frame analysis and social marketing Web site. Available at: http://www.frameworksinstitute.org/. Updated 2007. Accessed November 29, 2011.
13.
GregsonJJ. System, environmental, and policy changes: Using the social-ecological model as a framework for evaluating nutrition education and social marketing programs with low-income audiences. J Nutr Educ.2001;33:S4–S15.
14.
HoganVKAmamooMAAndersonAD. Barriers to women's participation in inter-conceptional care: A cross-sectional analysis. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:93. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-93.
15.
Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, Commission on Social Determinants of Health; 2008. Available at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2008/9789241563703_eng.pdf. Accessed June 27, 2012.
16.
JonesCPJonesCYPerryGS. Addressing the social determinants of children's health: A cliff analogy. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009;20(4 suppl):1–12. doi:10.1353/hpu.0.0228.
17.
JonesCP. Levels of racism: A theoretic framework and a gardener's tale. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(8):1212–1215.
MullingsLSchulzAJ. Intersectionality and health: An introduction. In: MullingsLSchulzAJ, eds. Gender, Race, Class and Health: Intersectional Approaches. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey Bass; 2006:3–20.
20.
JacksonFMPhillipsMTHogueCJCurry-OwensTY. Examining the burdens of gendered racism: Implications for pregnancy outcomes among college-educated African-American women. Matern Child Health J.2001;5(2):95–107.
21.
JacksonFMRowleyDLOwensCurry T. Contextualized stress, global stress, and depression in well-educated, pregnant, African-American women. Womens Health Issues. 2012;22(3): e329–e336. doi:10.1016/j.whi.2012.01.003.
22.
Nuru-JeterADominguezTPHammondWP. “It's the skin you're in”: African-American women talk about their experiences of racism. An exploratory study to develop measures of racism for birth outcome studies. Matern Child Health J.2009;13(1):29–39. doi:10.1007/s10995-008-0357-x.
23.
GiscombéCCL. Explaining disproportionately high rates of adverse birth outcomes among African Americans: The impact of stress, racism, and related factors in pregnancy. Psychol Bull.2005;131(5):662–683.
24.
HoganVKRowleyDBennettTTaylorKD. Life course, social determinants, and health inequities: Toward a national plan for achieving health equity for African American infants—a concept paper. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2012;16(6):1143–1150
25.
WebbDACoyneJCGoldenbergRL. Recruitment and retention of women in a large randomized control trial to reduce repeat preterm births: The Philadelphia collaborative preterm prevention project. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:88. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-10-88.
26.
PeltoPJ. Anthropological Research: The Structure of Inquiry. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 1978.
27.
DelaneyC. Participant observation: The razor's edge. Dialectical Anthropol. 1988;13:291.
ShapiroTMMeschedeTSullivanL. The Racial Wealth Gap Increases Four-Fold. Waltham, Mass: Heller School of Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Institute on Assets and Social Policy; 2010. Research and policy brief.
35.
MasnickGS. Home Ownership Trends and Racial Inequality in the United States in the 20th Century. Cambridge, Mass: Joint Center for Housing Studies, Harvard University; 2001.
36.
MendezDDHoganVKCulhaneJ. Institutional racism and pregnancy health: Using home mortgage disclosure act data to develop an index for mortgage discrimination at the community level. Public Health Rep.2011;126(suppl 3):102–114.
HobelCCulhaneJ. Role of psychosocial and nutritional stress on poor pregnancy outcome. J Nutr.2003;133(5suppl 2):1709S–1717S.
40.
WadhwaPPD. Stress, infection and preterm birth: A biobehavioural perspective. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001;15(s2):17–29.
41.
LevensteinL. A Movement Without Marches: African American Women and the Politics of Poverty in Postwar Philadelphia. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press; 2009.
42.
DeNavas-WaltCProctorBDSmithJC. Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2009. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2010. US Census Bureau current population reports.
HancockA.The Politics of Disgust: The Public Identity of the Welfare Queen. New York, NY: New York University Press; 2004.
45.
MasseyDS. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1993.
46.
O'DonnellMP. Definition of health promotion 2.0: Embracing passion, enhancing motivation, recognizing dynamic balance, and creating opportunities. Am J Health Promot. 2009;24(1):iv. doi:10.4278/ajhp.24.1.iv.
