An Intervention to Increase Compliance with a Tobacco-Free University Policy

Abstract

Purpose.

To test the effects of a population-based self-efficacy message card campaign on compliance with a tobacco-free campus policy.

Setting.

This study was conducted at a large public university in the South.

Subjects.

Three hundred twelve observational periods at 39 campus sites.

Intervention.

The message card campaign, based on the Theory of Planned Behavior, consisted of distributing approximately 6000 efficacy-enhancing cards over 3 days. The intent of the cards was to increase awareness of the policy and resources available to help individuals stop smoking or remain comfortable while on campus.

Measures.

Policy compliance was measured using the Tobacco-Free Compliance Assessment Tool. Field notes were used to assess campaign reaction.

Analysis.

Mann-Whitney U-test was conducted to compare number of cigarette butts in hot spot areas before and after the intervention. A rate ratio was also calculated using Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping software to compare cigarette butts collected per day before and after the intervention at each of the study sites.

Results.

The median number of cigarette butts per day after the intervention was significantly lower than before the intervention (1.9 vs. 4.7, χ²: 8.1, p = .004). Eighteen sites (66.6%) had a post-pre ratio of .11 to .75, indicating a decrease in cigarette butts per day.

Conclusion.

An efficacy-enhancing message card campaign shows promise in improving compliance with tobacco-free campus policies.

Keywords

Tobacco-Free Policy Implementation Policy Compliance Prevention Research Manuscript format: research Research purpose: intervention testing Study design: quasi-experimental Outcome measure: behavioral Setting: school Health focus: smoking Strategy: policy Target population age: young adults Target population circumstances: college students,all income levels,southern United States,all races/ethnicities

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

US Dept of Health and Human Services. How Tobacco Smoke Causes Disease: The Biology and Behavioral Basis for Smoking-Attributable Disease: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, Ga: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2010.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital signs: Current cigarette smoking among adults aged ≥ 18 years—United States, 2009. JAMA. 2010;304:1889–1891.

Halperin

Smith

Heiligenstein

. Cigarette smoking and associated health risks among students at five universities. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009;12:96–104.

Wolfson

McCoy

Sutfin

. College students' exposure to secondhand smoke. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009;11:977–984.

Seo

Macy

Torabi

Middlestadt

. The effect of a smoke-free campus policy on college students' smoking behaviors and attitudes. Prev Med. 2011;53:347–352.

Klepeis

Ott

Switzer

. Real-time measurement of outdoor tobacco smoke particles. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2007;57:522–534.

Repace

. Measurements of Outdoor Air Pollution From Secondhand Smoke on the UMBC Campus. Bowie, MD: Repace Associates Inc., 2005.

Williams

Hafner

Morton

. The adoption of smoke-free hospital campuses in the United States. Tob Control. 2009;18:451–458.

Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights. US colleges and universities with smokefree air policies 2011. Available at: http://no-smoke.org/pdf/smokefreecollegesuniversities.pdf. Accessed July 1, 2011.

10.

Anderson

. Public Policymaking. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Holt Rinehart & Winston; 1979.

11.

Sabatier

. Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A suggested synthesis. J Public Policy. 1986;6:21–48.

12.

University of Kentucky. University of Kentucky tobacco-free policy. 2010. Available at: http://www.uky.edu/TobaccoFree/. Accessed October 1, 2010.

13.

Foley

Proescholdbell

Malek

Johnson

. Implementation and enforcement of tobacco bans in two prisons in North Carolina: A qualitative inquiry. J Correctional Health Care. 2010;16:98–105.

14.

Lazuras

Eiser

Rodafinos

. Predicting smokers' non-compliance with smoking restrictions in public places. Tob Control. 2009;18:127–131.

15.

Harris

Stearns

Kovach

Harrar

. Enforcing an outdoor smoking ban on a college campus: Effects of a multicomponent approach. J Am Coll Health. 2009;58:121–126.

16.

University of Kentucky. Institutional research, planning, and effectiveness. 2010. Available at: http://www.uky.edu/IRPE/diversity/students.html. Accessed March 1, 2010.

17.

van de Ven

MOM

Engels

RCME

Otten

van den Eijnden

RJJM

. A longitudinal test of the theory of planned behavior predicting smoking onset among asthmatic and non-asthmatic adolescents. J Behav Med. 2007;30:435–445.

18.

Nehl

Blanchard

Peng

C-Y

. Understanding nonsmoking in African American and Caucasian college students: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Behav Med. 2009;35:23–29.

19.

Droomers

Schrijvers

CTM

Mackenbach

. Educational differences in the intention to stop smoking. Eur J Public Health. 2004;14:194–198.

20.

Rise

Kovac

Kraft

Moan

. Predicting the intention to quit smoking and quitting behaviour: Extending the theory of planned behaviour. Br J Health Psychol. 2008;13:291–310.

21.

Ajzen

. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50:179–211.

22.

Moriarty

Stryker

. Prevention and screening efficacy messages in newspaper accounts of cancer. Health Educ Res. 2008;22:487–498.

23.

Fallin

Johnson

Murrey

Hahn

. Development and Psychometric Properties of the Tobacco-Free Compliance Assessment Tool. Lexington: University of Kentucky; 2010.

24.

Randolph

Viswanath

. Lessons learned from public health mass media campaigns: Marketing health in a crowded media world. Annu Rev Public Health. 2004;25:419–437.

25.

Scriven

. Social Science Education Consortium. Publication 110, the methodology of evaluation. Available at: http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED014001.pdf. Accessed February 6, 2012.

26.

Novotny

Lum

Smith

. Cigarettes butts and the case for an environmental policy on hazardous cigarette waste. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009;6:1691–1705.