To evaluate the effectiveness of addressing multiple barriers to physical activity (PA) using interventions at the workplace.
Design.
The Physical Activity and Lifestyle Study used a randomized controlled trial in which 60 university departments were randomized into five groups.
Setting.
Large Southeastern university.
Subjects.
Physically inactive nonfaculty employees in the participating departments (n = 410) were interviewed five times over 9 months, with 82% completing all surveys.
Intervention.
Departments were randomly assigned to (1) control, (2) gym membership, (3) gym + PA education, (4) gym + time during the workday, and (5) gym + education + time.
Measures.
PA intensity and quantity were measured using the 7-day Physical Activity Recall instrument, with PA then classified as the number of days meeting Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines.
Analysis.
The outcome was modeled with generalized linear mixed model methodology.
Results.
There was no significant improvement when a group received gym alone compared to the control (Rate Ratio [RR]) 1.22 [.90, 1.67]). However, gym + education, gym + time, and gym + education + time were significantly better than the control (RR 1.51 [1.15, 1.98], RR 1.46 [1.13, 1.88], RR 1.28 [1.01, 1.62]), with improvements sustained over the 9 months.
Conclusion.
Among sedentary adults who had access to indoor exercise facilities, addressing environmental and cognitive barriers simultaneously (i.e., time and education) did not encourage more activity than addressing either barrier alone.
KnowlerWCBarrett-ConnorEFowlerSE. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med.2002;346:393–403.
2.
ThompsonPDBuchnerDPinaIL. American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention) and the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity). Exercise and physical activity in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: A statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation. 2003;107:3109–3116.
3.
BrosseALSheetsESLettHSBlumenthalJA. Exercise and the treatment of clinical depression in adults: Recent findings and future directions. Sports Med.2002;32:741–760.
4.
LeeIOgumaY. Physical activity. In: SchottenfeldDFraumeniJF, eds. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. 3rd ed.New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2006.
5.
SlatteryMLPotterJD. Physical activity and colon cancer: Confounding or interaction?Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:913–919.
6.
LeeIMSkerrettPJ. Physical activity and all-cause mortality: What is the dose-response relation?Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(suppl):S459–S471.
DishmanRKOldenbergBO'NealHShephardRJ. Worksite physical activity interventions. Am J Prev Med.1998;15:344–361.
9.
ShepherdRJ. Worksite fitness and exercise programs: A review of methodology and health impact. Am J Health Promot. 1996;10:436–452.
10.
MarcusBHWilliamsDMDubbertPM. Physical activity intervention studies: What we know and what we need to know. Circulation. 2006;114:2739–2752.
11.
ProperKIKoningMvan der BeekAJ. The effectiveness of worksite physical activity programs on physical activity, physical fitness, and health. Clin J Sport Med.2003;13:106–117.
12.
KatzDLO'ConnellMYehMC. Public health strategies for preventing and controlling overweight and obesity in school and worksite settings: A report on recommendations of the Task Force on Community Preventive Services. MMWR Recomm Rep.2005;54(RR10):1–12.
13.
GlanzKSorensenGFarmerA. The health impact of worksite nutrition and cholesterol intervention programs. Am J Health Promot. 1996;10:453–470.
14.
BaranowskiTPerryCLParcelGS. How individuals, environments, and health behavior interact. Social cognitive theory. In: GlanzKRimerBKLewisFM, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice. 3rd ed.San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 2002:165–184.
LucoveJCHustonSLEvensonKR. Workers' perceptions about worksite policies and environments and their association with leisure-time physical activity. Am J Health Promot. 2007;21:196–200.
21.
KrugerJYoreMMBauerDRKohlHW. Selected barriers and incentives for worksite health promotion services and policies. Am J Health Promot. 2007;21:439–447.
22.
StuttsWC. Physical activity determinants in adults. Perceived benefits, barriers, and self efficacy. AAOHN J.2002;50:499–507.
23.
MavisBEStachnikTJGibsonCAStöffelmayrBE. Issues related to participation in worksite health promotion: A preliminary study. Am J Health Promot. 1992;7:53–60.
24.
OsujiTLovegreenSLElliottMBrownsonRC. Barriers to physical activity among women in the rural midwest. Women Health. 2006;44:41–55.
25.
Van DuynMAMcCraeTWingroveBK. Adapting evidence-based strategies to increase physical activity among African Americans, Hispanics, Hmong, and Native Hawaiians: A social marketing approach. Prev Chronic Dis.2007;4:A102.
SallisJFHaskellWLWoodPD. Physical activity assessment methodology in the Five-City Project. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;121:91–106.
29.
WeissBDMaysMZMartzW. Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: The newest vital sign. Ann Fam Med.2005;3(6):514–522.
30.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey questionnaire. Atlanta, Ga: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2003. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/questionnaires/pdf-ques/2003brfss.pdf. Accessed March 22, 2010.
31.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).Health-Related-Quality-of-Life 14-item measure (HRQOL-14). Healthy Days Core Module. 2005. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/hrqol/hrqol14_measure.htm. Accessed March 30, 2006.
32.
MarcusBHSelbyVCNiauraRSRossiJS. Self-efficacy and the stages of exercise behavior change. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1992;63:60–65.
33.
SchaferJL. Multiple imputation: A primer. Stat Methods Med Res.1999;8:3–15.
34.
SAS Institute Inc.SAS/STAT® 9.2 User's Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 2008.
35.
IyengarSLepperMR. When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000;79(6):995–1006.
36.
Guide to Community Preventive Services.Environmental and policy approaches to increase physical activity: Creation of or enhanced access to places for physical activity combined with informational outreach activities. Last updated October 2001. Available at: www.thecommunityguide.org/pa/environmental-policy/improvingaccess.html. Accessed March 29, 2009.
