Assessing and Comparing the Short-Term Effects of TPB Only and TPB plus Implementation Intentions Interventions on Snacking Behavior in Iranian Adolescent Girls: A Cluster Randomized Trial
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2013
Assessing and Comparing the Short-Term Effects of TPB Only and TPB plus Implementation Intentions Interventions on Snacking Behavior in Iranian Adolescent Girls: A Cluster Randomized Trial
The evidence for the effectiveness of theory of planned behavior (TPB)–based interventions is mixed. There is also mixed evidence on the effectiveness of adding implementation intentions to TPB-based interventions. In this study we assessed and compared the short-term effects of TPB-only intervention and TPB plus implementation intentions intervention on snacking behavior and intention to consume unhealthy snacks in Iranian adolescent girls.
Design.
Three-arm cluster randomized controlled trial.
Setting.
Ten middle schools in Tehran (Iran).
Subjects.
A total of 29 classes included 739 female adolescents (age range: 12–15 years).
Intervention.
Two brief interventions including TPB-only intervention and TPB plus implementation intentions intervention.
Measures.
Food frequency questionnaire and intentions at baseline, 10 days, and 3 months measuring snacking behavior and cognitions about unhealthy snack consumption, respectively.
Analysis.
Hierarchical linear modeling to assess the interventions' effects.
Results.
Both interventions successfully decreased intention to consume and consumption of unhealthy snacks at postintervention. Calculation of the effect sizes revealed that the TPB plus implementation intentions intervention was more effective than the TPB-only intervention. The effects remained significant at 3-month follow-up in the TPB plus implementation intentions intervention group only, although the effect size decreased.
Conclusion.
Overall, the study suggests that adding implementation intentions on top of TPB-based persuasive messages improves effectiveness and sustainability of desirable changes.
Van CauwenbergheEMaesLSpittaelsH. Effectiveness of school-based interventions in Europe to promote healthy nutrition in children and adolescents: Systematic review of published and ‘grey’ literature. Br J Nutr.2010;103:781–797.
2.
GhassemiHHarrisonGMohammadK. An accelerated nutrition transition in Iran. Public Health Nutr.2002;5:149–155.
3.
KelishadiRArdalanGGheiratmandR. Association of physical activity and dietary behaviours in relation to the body mass index in a national sample of Iranian children and adolescents: CASPIAN Study. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85:19–26.
4.
KelishadiRHashemipourMSarrafzadeganNAmiriM. Trend of atherosclerosis risk factors in Isfahan. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann.2001;9:36–40.
5.
MarteauTSowdenAArmstrongD. Implementing research findings into practice: Beyond the information deficit model. In: HainesADonaldA, eds. Getting Research Findings Into Practice. 2nd ed.London, UK: British Medical Journal Books; 2000.
6.
BrugJOenemaAFerreiraI. Theory, evidence and intervention mapping to improve behavior nutrition and physical activity interventions. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2005;2:2.
7.
SharmaMRomasJA. Theoretical Foundations of Health Education and Health Promotion. Sudbury, Mass: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2008.
8.
HardemanWJohnstonMJohnstonDW. Application of theory of planned behavior in behavior change interventions: A systematic review. Psychol Health. 2002;17:123–158.
9.
MierNOryMGMedinaAA. Anatomy of culturally sensitive interventions promoting nutrition and exercise in Hispanics: A critical examination of existing literature. Health Promot Pract.2010;11:541–554.
10.
AjzenI. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50:179–211.
11.
ArmitageJConnerM. Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol. 2001;40:470–499.
12.
GodinGKokG. The theory of planned behavior: A review of its applications to health-related behaviors. Am J Health Promot. 1996;11:87–98.
13.
ElliottMAArmitageCJ. Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior as a basis for behaviour change interventions: A systematic review. 2007. Unpublished manuscript.
14.
HardemanWSuttonSGriffinS. A causal modelling approach to the development of theory-based behaviour change programmes for trial evaluation. Health Educ Res.2005;20:676–687.
15.
ChatzisarantisNLDHaggerMS. Effects of a brief intervention based on the Theory of Planned Behavior on leisure time physical activity participation. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2005;27:470–487.
16.
JonesLWSinclairRCCourneyaKS. The effects of source credibility and message framing on exercise intentions, behaviors, and attitudes: An integration of the elaboration likelihood model and prospect theory. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2003;33:179–196.
17.
De RidderDDe WitJ. Self Regulation in Health Behaviour. Wiltshire, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2006.
18.
JacksonCLawtonRKnappP. Beyond intention: Do specific plans increase health behaviours in patients in primary care? A study of fruit and vegetable consumption. Soc Sci Med.2005;60:2383–2391.
19.
GollwitzerPM. Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. Am Psychol. 1999;54:493–503.
20.
SheeranP. Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2002;12:1–36.
21.
De VetEOenemaASheeranPBrugJ. Should implementation intentions interventions be implemented in obesity prevention: The impact of if-then plans on daily physical activity in Dutch adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:11.
22.
AdriaanseMAVinkersCDDe RidderDT. Do implementation intentions help to eat a healthy diet? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Appetite. 2011;56:183–193.
23.
SheeranPWebbTLGollwitzerPM. The interplay between goal intentions and implementation intentions. Pers Soc Psychol Bull.2005;31:87–98.
24.
SeehausenRBayerUCGollwitzerPM. Experimental studies on the intentional control of behavior. Paper presented at: 39th Convention of the German Psychological Society; 1994; Hamburg, Germany.
25.
RashidianAMilesJRussellDRussellI. Sample size for regression analyses of theory of planned behavior studies: Case of prescribing in general practice. Br J Health Psychol. 2006;11:581–593.
26.
GodinJBélanger-GravelAEcclesMGrimshawJ. Healthcare professionals' intentions and behaviours: A systematic review of studies based on social cognitive theories. Implement Sci.2008;3:36.
27.
Karimi-ShahanjariniARashidianAMajdzadehR. Parental control and junk food consumption: A mediating and moderating effect analysis. J Appl Soc Psychol. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00885.x.
28.
BundyC. Changing behaviour: Using motivational interviewing techniques. J R Soc Med.2004;97:43–47.
Karimi-ShahanjariniAOmidvarNBazarganM. Iranian female adolescent's views on unhealthy snacks consumption: A qualitative study. Iran J Publ Health. 2010;39:92–101.
31.
Karimi-ShahanjariniARashidianAMajdzadehR. The role of sociocognitive mediators in the belief-intention relationship: Snacking behavior. Int J Soc Behav Pers.2010;38:711–720.
32.
HebertJRMaYClemowL. Gender differences in social desirability and social approval bias in dietary self report. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;146:1046–1055.
33.
KristalARAndrillaHAKoepsellTD. Dietary assessment instruments are susceptible to intervention-associated response set bias. J Am Diet Assoc.1998;98:40–43.
34.
NajarianBSoudaniM. Construction and validation of a scale for the measurement of reality distortion [in Persian]. Educ Psychol. 2001;8:99–114.
35.
BabaeiBEhsanBahrami HReza-ZadehRKavianiH. Study on the relations between one's personality dimensions and his personality judgment about friend based on reality distortion. Int J Behav Cogn Educ Psychol Sci.2009;1:100–103.
36.
MirmiranPAzadbakhtLAziziF. Dietary behaviour of Tehranian adolescents does not accord with their nutritional knowledge. Public Health Nutr.2007;10:897–901.
37.
SayariASheykholeslamRNaghaviM. Surveying the amount of junk food consumption in under-3-year-old children of rural and urban areas [in Persian]. Kashan Univ Med Sci Health Serv.2002;21:75–71.
38.
CohenJ. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
39.
WebbTLSheeranP. Does changing behavioral intentions engender behaviour change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychol Bull.2006;132:249–268.
40.
Fife-SchawCSheeranPNormanP. Simulating behaviour change interventions based on the theory of planned behaviour: Impacts on intention and action. Br J Soc Psychol. 2007;46:43–68.
41.
JacksonCLawtonRJRaynorDK. Promoting adherence to antibiotics: A test of implementation intentions. Patient Educ Couns.2006;61:212–218.
42.
VerplankenBWoodW. Interventions to break and create consumer habits. Am Mark Assoc.2006;25:90–103.
43.
OmidvarNEghtesadiShGhazi-TabatabieM. Psychosocial correlates of low fruit and vegetable intake among adolescent boys and girls in Tehran [in Persian]. Pajouhesh. 2003;42:385–339.
44.
ArbourKPGinisMartin KA. Helping middle-aged women translate physical activity intentions into action: Combining the theory of planned behavior and implementation intentions. J Appl Biobehav Res.2004;9:172–187.
45.
WebbTLSheeranP. Mechanisms of implementation intention effects: The role of goal intentions, self-efficacy, and accessibility of plan components. Br J Soc Psychol. 2008;47:373–395.
TilgnerLWertheimEHPaxtonSJ. Effects of social desirability on adolescent girls' responses to an eating disorders prevention program. Int J Eat Disord. 2004;35:211–216.
