BuisLR. Emotional and informational support messages in an online hospice support community. Comput Inform Nurs.2008;26:358–367.
4.
BuisLRWhittenP. Comparison of social support content within online communities for high- and low-survival-rate cancers. Comput Inform Nurs.2011;29:471–477.
5.
CoulsonNS. Receiving social support online: an analysis of a computer-mediated support group for individuals living with irritable bowel syndrome. Cyberpsychol Behav.2005;8:580–584.
6.
CoulsonNSBuchananHAubeeluckA. Social support in cyberspace: a content analysis of communication within a Huntington's disease online support group. Patient Educ Couns.2007;68:173–178.
7.
LaskerJNSogolowEDSharimRR. The role of an online community for people with a rare disease: content analysis of messages posted on a primary biliary cirrhosis mailinglist. J Med Internet Res.2005;7:e10.
BanduraA. The primacy of self-regulation in health promotion. Applied Psychology: An International Review.2005;54:245–254.
14.
MichieSAbrahamCWhittingtonC. Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression. Health Psychol.2009;28:690–701.
15.
SpahnJMReevesRSKeimKS. State of the evidence regarding behavior change theories and strategies in nutrition counseling to facilitate health and food behavior change. J Am Diet Assoc.2010;110:879–891.
16.
BurkeLESereikaSMMusicE. Using instrumented paper diaries to document self-monitoring patterns in weight loss. Contemp Clin Trials.2008;29:182–193.
17.
BuisLRPoultonTAHollemanRG. Evaluating Active U: an Internet-mediated physical activity program. BMC Public Health.2009;9:331.
18.
RichardsonCRMehariKSMcIntyreLG. A randomized trial comparing structured and lifestyle goals in an Internet-mediated walking program for people with type 2 diabetes. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act.2007;4:59.
19.
McTigueKMConroyMBHessR. Using the internet to translate an evidence-based lifestyle intervention into practice. Telemed J E Health.2009;15:851–858.
20.
van der MeerVvan StelHFBakkerMJ. Weekly self-monitoring and treatment adjustment benefit patients with partly controlled and uncontrolled asthma: an analysis of the SMASHING study. Respir Res.2010;11:74.
21.
MooreTJAlsabeehNApovianCM. Weight, blood pressure, and dietary benefits after 12 months of a Web-based Nutrition Education Program (DASH for health): longitudinal observational study. J Med Internet Res.2008;10(4):e52.
22.
RichardsonCRBuisLRJanneyAW. An online community improves adherence in an internet-mediated walking program: Part 1. results of a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res.2010;12(4):e71.
23.
DaleOHagenKB. Despite technical problems personal digital assistants outperform pen and paper when collecting patient diary data. J Clin Epidemiol.2007;60:8–17.
24.
JiangHHanJZhuZ. Patient compliance with assessing and monitoring of asthma. J Asthma.2009;46:1027–1031.
25.
StoneAAShiffmanSSchwartzJE. Patient non-compliance with paper diaries. BMJ.2002;324:1193–1194.
26.
StoneAAShiffmanSSchwartzJE. Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries. Control Clin Trials.2003;24:182–199.
27.
Vallee-SmejdaSHahnMAubinNRosmusC. Recording practices and satisfaction of hemophiliac patients using two different data entry systems. Comput Inform Nurs.2009;27:372–378.
MacdiarmidJBlundellJ. Assessing dietary intake: who, what and why of under-reporting. Nutr Res Rev.1998;11:231–253.
30.
GriffithsFLindenmeyerAPowellJ. Why are health care interventions delivered over the internet? A systematic review of the published literature. J Med Internet Res.2006;8:e10.
31.
MaesSKarolyP. Self-regulation assessment and intervention in physical health and illness: a review. Appl Psychol.2005;54:267–299.
32.
HwangKOOttenbacherAJGreenAP. Social support in an Internet weight loss community. Int J Med Inform.79:5–13.
33.
BoekaertsMPintrichPRZeidnerM, eds. Handbook of Self-Regulation.San Diego, Ca: Academic Press; 2000.
34.
CameronLLeventhalH, eds. The Self-Regulation of Health and Illness Behavior.New York, NY: Routledge; 2003.
35.
ParkEJMcDanielAJungMS. Computerized tailoring of health information. Comput Inform Nurs.2009;27:34–43.
36.
LustriaMLCorteseJNoarSMGlueckaufRL. Computer-tailored health interventions delivered over the Web: review and analysis of key components. Patient Educ Couns.2009;74:156–173.
37.
KroezeWWerkmanABrugJ. A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors. Ann Behav Med.2006;31:205–223.
38.
NevilleLMO'HaraBMilatAJ. Computer-tailored dietary behavior change interventions: a systematic review. Health Educ Res.2009;24:699–720.
39.
SpittaelsHDe BourdeaudhuijIVandelanotteC. Evaluation of a website-delivered computer-tailored intervention for increasing physical activity in the general population. Prev Med.2007;44:209–217.
40.
UnrodMSmithMSpringB. Randomized controlled trial of a computer-based, tailored intervention to increase smoking cessation counseling by primary care physicians. J Gen Intern Med.2007;22:478–484.
41.
BerkmanLFSymeSL. Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: a nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. Am J Epidemiol.1979;109:186–204.
42.
BlazerDG. Social support and mortality in an elderly community population. Am J Epidemiol.1982;115:684–694.
43.
FarmerADBruckner HoltCE. Social networking sites: a novel portal for communication. Postgrad Med J.2009;85:455–459.
44.
KlemmPReppertKVisichL. A nontraditional cancer support group: the Internet. Comput Nurs.1998;16:31–36.
45.
WhiteMHDormanSM. Online support for caregivers: analysis of an Internet Alzheimer mailgroup. Comput Nurs.2000;18:168–176; quiz 177–169.
46.
BanduraA. Self-efficacy. In: RamachaudranVS, eds. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior.Vol 4. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1994:71–81.
47.
McTigueKMBhargavaTBryceCL. Patient perspectives on the integration of an intensive online behavioral weight loss intervention into primary care. Patient Educ Couns.2011;83:261–264.
48.
GoodrichDEBuisLRJanneyAW. Integrating an Internet-mediated walking program into family medicine clinical practice: a pilot feasibility study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak.2011;11:47.
49.
BrotskySRGilesD. Inside the “pro-ana” community: a covert online participant observation. Eat Disord.2007;15:93–109.
50.
WhitlockJLPowersJLEckenrodeJ. The virtual cutting edge: the internet and adolescent self-injury. Dev Psychol.2006;42:407–417.
51.
AlaoAOSoderbergMPohlELAlaoAL. Cybersuicide: review of the role of the internet on suicide. Cyberpsychol Behav.2006;9:489–493.
52.
Brunstein KlomekASouranderAGouldM. The association of suicide and bullying in childhood to young adulthood: a review of cross-sectional and longitudinal research findings. Can J Psychiatry.2010;55:282–288.
53.
HindujaSPatchinJW. Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Arch Suicide Res.2010;14:206–221.
54.
BodieGDDuttaMJ. Understanding health literacy for strategic health marketing: eHealth literacy, health disparities, and the digital divide. Health Mark Q.2008;25:175–203.